Institutional investor ESG activism and green supply chain management performance: Exploring contingent roles of technological interdependences in different digital intelligence contexts

IF 12.9 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Technological Forecasting and Social Change Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123789
Bao Wu , Kangjun Ren , Yao Fu , Defeng He , Mengmeng Pan
{"title":"Institutional investor ESG activism and green supply chain management performance: Exploring contingent roles of technological interdependences in different digital intelligence contexts","authors":"Bao Wu ,&nbsp;Kangjun Ren ,&nbsp;Yao Fu ,&nbsp;Defeng He ,&nbsp;Mengmeng Pan","doi":"10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While scholars have largely confirmed that target firms respond proactively to institutional investor ESG activism, a wide range of studies pay little attention to green responses beyond organizational boundaries. Based on a dataset comprising 8557 firm-year observations of Chinese publicly listed manufacturing firms from 2012 to 2021, we find that institutional investor ESG activism also prompts firms to improve green supply chain management performance. In industries with a higher level of technological integration, firms are more likely to enhance green supply chain management performance at the ESG requests of institutional investors. Firms with greater technological influence are also more inclined to adopt such a collaborative-based green response. Both the moderating effects of technological integration and technological influence are more pronounced for firms equipped with digital intelligence. Our findings provide novel implications for firms seeking to address shareholder environmental concerns through green supply chain management in the context of digital intelligence.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48454,"journal":{"name":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 123789"},"PeriodicalIF":12.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162524005870","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While scholars have largely confirmed that target firms respond proactively to institutional investor ESG activism, a wide range of studies pay little attention to green responses beyond organizational boundaries. Based on a dataset comprising 8557 firm-year observations of Chinese publicly listed manufacturing firms from 2012 to 2021, we find that institutional investor ESG activism also prompts firms to improve green supply chain management performance. In industries with a higher level of technological integration, firms are more likely to enhance green supply chain management performance at the ESG requests of institutional investors. Firms with greater technological influence are also more inclined to adopt such a collaborative-based green response. Both the moderating effects of technological integration and technological influence are more pronounced for firms equipped with digital intelligence. Our findings provide novel implications for firms seeking to address shareholder environmental concerns through green supply chain management in the context of digital intelligence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机构投资者的环境、社会和治理行动主义与绿色供应链管理绩效:探索不同数字智能背景下技术相互依存的权变作用
尽管学者们已基本证实目标企业会对机构投资者的环境、社会和治理激进主义做出积极回应,但大量研究却很少关注组织边界之外的绿色回应。基于2012-2021年中国制造业上市公司的8557个公司年观测数据集,我们发现机构投资者的环境、社会和公司治理行动也会促使企业提高绿色供应链管理绩效。在技术集成度较高的行业,企业更有可能应机构投资者的ESG要求提高绿色供应链管理绩效。技术影响力更大的企业也更倾向于采取这种基于合作的绿色对策。对于具备数字智能的企业来说,技术整合和技术影响力的调节作用都更为明显。我们的研究结果为企业在数字智能背景下通过绿色供应链管理解决股东环境问题提供了新的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
10.80%
发文量
813
期刊介绍: Technological Forecasting and Social Change is a prominent platform for individuals engaged in the methodology and application of technological forecasting and future studies as planning tools, exploring the interconnectedness of social, environmental, and technological factors. In addition to serving as a key forum for these discussions, we offer numerous benefits for authors, including complimentary PDFs, a generous copyright policy, exclusive discounts on Elsevier publications, and more.
期刊最新文献
Roles of related and unrelated external technologies in shaping regional breakthrough technological advantages Standardization and Standards: Safeguards of Technological Sovereignty? Understanding service robot adoption and resistance from a service provider perspective Examining trust in cryptocurrency investment: Insights from the structural equation modeling Enabling a viable circular ecosystem for electric vehicle batteries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1