Liam P. Alderson BS , Srivani Sanikommu MD , Simon C. Mears MD, PhD , C. Lowry Barnes MD , Benjamin M. Stronach MD , Jeffrey B. Stambough MD , Jennifer McDonald RPh , Traci Motes APRN , Brett Bailey PharmD , Ryan K. Dare MD
{"title":"Dalbavancin Use in Bone and Joint Infections","authors":"Liam P. Alderson BS , Srivani Sanikommu MD , Simon C. Mears MD, PhD , C. Lowry Barnes MD , Benjamin M. Stronach MD , Jeffrey B. Stambough MD , Jennifer McDonald RPh , Traci Motes APRN , Brett Bailey PharmD , Ryan K. Dare MD","doi":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Dalbavancin (DAL) off-label use for treating bone and joint infections has increased especially as long-term intravenous access is not needed. Little is known about the effectiveness and safety of its use.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective, single-center, descriptive study included adults treated with DAL for bone or joint infections over a 4-year period (2019-2023). Patient demographics, infection type and location, pre-DAL antibiotic and surgical treatments, indication for DAL, and clinical outcomes were collected. Risk factor analysis for 1-year infection recurrence was performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 58 patient encounters of bone and/or joint infections treated with DAL. The majority of patients were treated for osteomyelitis (81.0%) followed by native (8.6%) and peri-prosthetic (10.4%) joint infection. Fifty (86.2%) patients underwent surgical intervention, and 17 (68%) of the 25 patients with infected hardware had full hardware removal. The most common pathogen identified was <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> (41; 70.7%), with methicillin-resistant <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> isolated in 23 (40.0%) cases. Ten (17.2%) patients had recurrence within 1 year. Hardware removal was found to significantly decrease the risk of infection recurrence (<em>P</em> = .026). None of the peri-prosthetic joint infection patients had infection recurrence within 1 year.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our findings support DAL as an effective treatment for bone and joint infection when combined with surgical debridement and hardware removal. Failure to remove infected hardware significantly increased the risk of infection recurrence within 1 year. Randomized controlled trials are needed to further support DAL as a novel treatment for orthopedic infections.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37940,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty Today","volume":"30 ","pages":"Article 101505"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroplasty Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344124001900","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Dalbavancin (DAL) off-label use for treating bone and joint infections has increased especially as long-term intravenous access is not needed. Little is known about the effectiveness and safety of its use.
Methods
This retrospective, single-center, descriptive study included adults treated with DAL for bone or joint infections over a 4-year period (2019-2023). Patient demographics, infection type and location, pre-DAL antibiotic and surgical treatments, indication for DAL, and clinical outcomes were collected. Risk factor analysis for 1-year infection recurrence was performed.
Results
There were 58 patient encounters of bone and/or joint infections treated with DAL. The majority of patients were treated for osteomyelitis (81.0%) followed by native (8.6%) and peri-prosthetic (10.4%) joint infection. Fifty (86.2%) patients underwent surgical intervention, and 17 (68%) of the 25 patients with infected hardware had full hardware removal. The most common pathogen identified was Staphylococcus aureus (41; 70.7%), with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated in 23 (40.0%) cases. Ten (17.2%) patients had recurrence within 1 year. Hardware removal was found to significantly decrease the risk of infection recurrence (P = .026). None of the peri-prosthetic joint infection patients had infection recurrence within 1 year.
Conclusions
Our findings support DAL as an effective treatment for bone and joint infection when combined with surgical debridement and hardware removal. Failure to remove infected hardware significantly increased the risk of infection recurrence within 1 year. Randomized controlled trials are needed to further support DAL as a novel treatment for orthopedic infections.
期刊介绍:
Arthroplasty Today is a companion journal to the Journal of Arthroplasty. The journal Arthroplasty Today brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement of the hip and knee in an open-access, online format. Arthroplasty Today solicits manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas of scientific endeavor that relate to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with patient outcomes, economic and policy issues, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, and biologic response to arthroplasty. The journal focuses on case reports. It is the purpose of Arthroplasty Today to present material to practicing orthopaedic surgeons that will keep them abreast of developments in the field, prove useful in the care of patients, and aid in understanding the scientific foundation of this subspecialty area of joint replacement. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal''s area of interest. Their participation ensures that each issue of Arthroplasty Today provides the reader with timely, peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality.