Legitimacy under pressure: Energy firms’ expansion in countries with weak environmental performance

IF 5.4 1区 经济学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES World Development Pub Date : 2024-10-12 DOI:10.1016/j.worlddev.2024.106800
{"title":"Legitimacy under pressure: Energy firms’ expansion in countries with weak environmental performance","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.worlddev.2024.106800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Environmental pollution and climate change have become alarming global issues in the process of rapid economic growth and accelerated internationalization. Due to the environmentally sensitive nature of energy firms, maintaining their legitimacy in the international expansion process, especially in countries with weak environmental performance, is a largely underexplored area in the existing literature. Building on legitimacy as a theoretical perspective, this study examines energy firms’ international expansion patterns when facing environmental pressure. We analyze a dataset of 2134 cross-border mergers and acquisitions conducted by energy firms between 1992 and 2019 to examine the impact of host-country environmental performance, encompassing environmental health (i.e., environmental conditions that affect human well-being) and climate change (i.e., variations in weather patterns), on their expansion. We also investigate the boundary conditions underpinning this relationship. We find that firm-level internalization capability and country-level diplomatic relations make energy firms appear legitimate to their internal and external audiences, respectively. The findings bring fresh insights to the literature on international expansion under environmental threats, enrich the legitimacy perspective, and outline practical implications for firms to preserve and enhance legitimacy for international growth. Additionally, we discuss important policy implications for governments to strengthen regulatory standards on environmental issues in support of sustainable world development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48463,"journal":{"name":"World Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Development","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X24002705","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Environmental pollution and climate change have become alarming global issues in the process of rapid economic growth and accelerated internationalization. Due to the environmentally sensitive nature of energy firms, maintaining their legitimacy in the international expansion process, especially in countries with weak environmental performance, is a largely underexplored area in the existing literature. Building on legitimacy as a theoretical perspective, this study examines energy firms’ international expansion patterns when facing environmental pressure. We analyze a dataset of 2134 cross-border mergers and acquisitions conducted by energy firms between 1992 and 2019 to examine the impact of host-country environmental performance, encompassing environmental health (i.e., environmental conditions that affect human well-being) and climate change (i.e., variations in weather patterns), on their expansion. We also investigate the boundary conditions underpinning this relationship. We find that firm-level internalization capability and country-level diplomatic relations make energy firms appear legitimate to their internal and external audiences, respectively. The findings bring fresh insights to the literature on international expansion under environmental threats, enrich the legitimacy perspective, and outline practical implications for firms to preserve and enhance legitimacy for international growth. Additionally, we discuss important policy implications for governments to strengthen regulatory standards on environmental issues in support of sustainable world development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
压力下的合法性:能源企业在环境绩效不佳国家的扩张
在经济快速增长和国际化进程加快的过程中,环境污染和气候变化已成为令人担忧的全球性问题。由于能源企业对环境的敏感性,在国际扩张过程中,尤其是在环境绩效较弱的国家,如何保持企业的合法性,是现有文献中一个基本未被充分探讨的领域。本研究以合法性为理论视角,探讨了能源企业在面临环境压力时的国际扩张模式。我们分析了能源企业在 1992 年至 2019 年间进行的 2134 起跨国并购的数据集,考察了东道国环境绩效(包括环境健康(即影响人类福祉的环境条件)和气候变化(即天气模式变化))对企业扩张的影响。我们还研究了支撑这种关系的边界条件。我们发现,企业层面的内部化能力和国家层面的外交关系分别使能源企业在内部和外部受众面前显得合法。这些发现为有关环境威胁下国际扩张的文献带来了新的见解,丰富了合法性视角,并概述了企业维护和增强国际增长合法性的实际意义。此外,我们还讨论了政府加强环境问题监管标准以支持世界可持续发展的重要政策含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World Development
World Development Multiple-
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
5.80%
发文量
320
期刊介绍: World Development is a multi-disciplinary monthly journal of development studies. It seeks to explore ways of improving standards of living, and the human condition generally, by examining potential solutions to problems such as: poverty, unemployment, malnutrition, disease, lack of shelter, environmental degradation, inadequate scientific and technological resources, trade and payments imbalances, international debt, gender and ethnic discrimination, militarism and civil conflict, and lack of popular participation in economic and political life. Contributions offer constructive ideas and analysis, and highlight the lessons to be learned from the experiences of different nations, societies, and economies.
期刊最新文献
Benefit or procedure? Determinants of perceived distributive fairness in rural China Gender imbalance and temporary migration: Evidence from rural China A qualitative examination of microfinance and intimate partner violence in India: Understanding the role of male backlash and household bargaining models Indigenous forest destroyers or guardians? The indigenous Batwa and their ancestral forests in Kahuzi-Biega National Park, DRC Fishery access benefits early childhood development through fish consumption and fishing income pathways
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1