Beyond the bench: LGBTQ+ health equity after India’s “no same-sex marriage” verdict

IF 5 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1016/j.lansea.2024.100494
Sofia Weiss Goitiandia , Akhilesh Agarwal , Smita C. Banerjee , Nirmala Bhoo-Pathy , Chandan Bose , Mahati Chittem , Roop Gursahani , L. Ramakrishnan , Smriti Rana , Naveen Salins , Malar Velli Segarmurthy , Aashiana Thiyam , William E. Rosa
{"title":"Beyond the bench: LGBTQ+ health equity after India’s “no same-sex marriage” verdict","authors":"Sofia Weiss Goitiandia ,&nbsp;Akhilesh Agarwal ,&nbsp;Smita C. Banerjee ,&nbsp;Nirmala Bhoo-Pathy ,&nbsp;Chandan Bose ,&nbsp;Mahati Chittem ,&nbsp;Roop Gursahani ,&nbsp;L. Ramakrishnan ,&nbsp;Smriti Rana ,&nbsp;Naveen Salins ,&nbsp;Malar Velli Segarmurthy ,&nbsp;Aashiana Thiyam ,&nbsp;William E. Rosa","doi":"10.1016/j.lansea.2024.100494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>LGBTQ+ people (e.g., lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer or questioning people) experience systemic marginalisation and discrimination globally and throughout India. In October 2023, the Indian Supreme Court rejected the legal recognition of same-sex marriage, blocking marriage equality for LGBTQ+ people and contending that the right to marry neither qualifies as a fundamental right accorded by the Indian Constitution nor falls under the Supreme Court’s purview. Although the Supreme Court declared opposition to discrimination based on sexual orientation, its failure to recognise same-sex marriage legally is a substantial obstruction to full LGBTQ+ equality. We propose that the refusal of the Indian legal system to honour same-sex marriage while calling for an end to societal violence and discriminatory behaviour against the LGBTQ+ community is inherently flawed and counterintuitive. Informed by our team’s multidisciplinary orientation as healthcare professionals, researchers, and advocates, we delineate explicit challenges that LGBTQ+ people in India may encounter due to the Supreme Court’s recent ruling. We subsequently put forth a series of interprofessional and intersectoral recommendations to mitigate this decision’s immediate and long-term consequences, providing an actionable path toward LGBTQ+ inclusion, justice, and equity in India.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":75136,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia","volume":"30 ","pages":"Article 100494"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772368224001446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

LGBTQ+ people (e.g., lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer or questioning people) experience systemic marginalisation and discrimination globally and throughout India. In October 2023, the Indian Supreme Court rejected the legal recognition of same-sex marriage, blocking marriage equality for LGBTQ+ people and contending that the right to marry neither qualifies as a fundamental right accorded by the Indian Constitution nor falls under the Supreme Court’s purview. Although the Supreme Court declared opposition to discrimination based on sexual orientation, its failure to recognise same-sex marriage legally is a substantial obstruction to full LGBTQ+ equality. We propose that the refusal of the Indian legal system to honour same-sex marriage while calling for an end to societal violence and discriminatory behaviour against the LGBTQ+ community is inherently flawed and counterintuitive. Informed by our team’s multidisciplinary orientation as healthcare professionals, researchers, and advocates, we delineate explicit challenges that LGBTQ+ people in India may encounter due to the Supreme Court’s recent ruling. We subsequently put forth a series of interprofessional and intersectoral recommendations to mitigate this decision’s immediate and long-term consequences, providing an actionable path toward LGBTQ+ inclusion, justice, and equity in India.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法官之外:印度 "禁止同性婚姻 "判决后的 LGBTQ+ 健康平等
在全球和整个印度,LGBTQ+人群(如女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人和同性恋或质疑者)都遭受着系统性的边缘化和歧视。2023 年 10 月,印度最高法院驳回了对同性婚姻的法律承认,阻止了 LGBTQ+ 人士的婚姻平等,并认为结婚权既不符合印度宪法赋予的基本权利,也不属于最高法院的职权范围。尽管最高法院宣布反对基于性取向的歧视,但它不承认同性婚姻的合法性是 LGBTQ+ 完全平等的实质性障碍。我们认为,印度法律体系在呼吁结束针对 LGBTQ+ 群体的社会暴力和歧视行为的同时,却拒绝承认同性婚姻,这种做法本身就存在缺陷,而且有悖常理。基于我们团队作为医疗保健专业人士、研究人员和倡导者的多学科定位,我们明确指出了印度的 LGBTQ+ 群体可能会因最高法院最近的裁决而面临的挑战。随后,我们提出了一系列跨专业和跨部门的建议,以减轻该裁决的直接和长期影响,为印度 LGBTQ+ 的包容、正义和公平提供了一条可行之路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Trajectories and social determinants of child cognitive development: a prospective cohort study from infancy through middle childhood in Dhaka, Bangladesh Identifying clustering of cholera cases using geospatial analysis in Kolkata and surrounding districts: data from patients at tertiary care referral hospitals Phenotypes of South Asian patients with atrial fibrillation and holistic integrated care management: cluster analysis of data from KERALA-AF Registry Exploring sex toy use among 18–45-year-old Indian adults: insights from a nationwide online survey Small-area variation in child under-vaccination in India: a multilevel analysis of cross-sectional data from 36 states and Union Territories, 707 districts, and 22,349 small-area clusters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1