Crypto/Space: Computational parasitism, virtual land grabs, and the production of Web3 Exit zones

IF 4.7 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Political Geography Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI:10.1016/j.polgeo.2024.103210
Peter Howson , Antulio Rosales , Olivier Jutel , Inte Gloerich , Mariel García Llorens , Alex de Vries , Jillian Crandall , Paul Dolan
{"title":"Crypto/Space: Computational parasitism, virtual land grabs, and the production of Web3 Exit zones","authors":"Peter Howson ,&nbsp;Antulio Rosales ,&nbsp;Olivier Jutel ,&nbsp;Inte Gloerich ,&nbsp;Mariel García Llorens ,&nbsp;Alex de Vries ,&nbsp;Jillian Crandall ,&nbsp;Paul Dolan","doi":"10.1016/j.polgeo.2024.103210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper explores how so-called ‘Web3’ blockchain projects are materially and socially constituted. A blockchain is an append-only distributed database. The technology is being hyped as applicable for a whole range of industries, social service provisions, and as a fix for economic disparities in communities left behind by mainstream financial systems. Drawing on case studies from our ongoing research we explain how, despite being virtual, Web3 projects are dependent on clearly defined spaces of production from which they derive their speculative value. We conceptualise this relationship as Crypto/Space, where space and blockchain software are mutually constituted. We consider how Crypto/Spaces are produced in three ways: 1) how project developers are adopting a parasitic relationship with host locations to appropriate energy, infrastructure, and local resources; 2) how projects enable ‘virtual land grabs’ where developers are engaging in land acquisitions, and associated displacement of local people, with no real intention to use the land for the declared purpose; and 3) how blockchain technology and speculative finance imaginaries are inspiring new anarcho-capitalist crypto-utopian ‘Exit zones’, often in the Global South. Far from being a zero-sum virtual game world, we argue that cryptocurrency projects are parasitic, often requiring predation on poor and otherwise marginalised communities to appropriate resources, onboard new users and enable favourable regulation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48262,"journal":{"name":"Political Geography","volume":"115 ","pages":"Article 103210"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Geography","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962629824001598","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores how so-called ‘Web3’ blockchain projects are materially and socially constituted. A blockchain is an append-only distributed database. The technology is being hyped as applicable for a whole range of industries, social service provisions, and as a fix for economic disparities in communities left behind by mainstream financial systems. Drawing on case studies from our ongoing research we explain how, despite being virtual, Web3 projects are dependent on clearly defined spaces of production from which they derive their speculative value. We conceptualise this relationship as Crypto/Space, where space and blockchain software are mutually constituted. We consider how Crypto/Spaces are produced in three ways: 1) how project developers are adopting a parasitic relationship with host locations to appropriate energy, infrastructure, and local resources; 2) how projects enable ‘virtual land grabs’ where developers are engaging in land acquisitions, and associated displacement of local people, with no real intention to use the land for the declared purpose; and 3) how blockchain technology and speculative finance imaginaries are inspiring new anarcho-capitalist crypto-utopian ‘Exit zones’, often in the Global South. Far from being a zero-sum virtual game world, we argue that cryptocurrency projects are parasitic, often requiring predation on poor and otherwise marginalised communities to appropriate resources, onboard new users and enable favourable regulation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加密/空间:计算寄生、虚拟土地掠夺和 Web3 出口区的生产
本文探讨了所谓的 "Web3 "区块链项目是如何在物质上和社会上构成的。区块链是一种仅有附录的分布式数据库。该技术被宣传为适用于一系列行业、提供社会服务,并能解决被主流金融体系抛在后面的社区的经济差距问题。根据我们正在进行的研究中的案例分析,我们解释了 Web3 项目尽管是虚拟的,但如何依赖于明确界定的生产空间,并从中获得投机价值。我们将这种关系概念化为 Crypto/空间,空间和区块链软件是相互构成的。我们从三个方面考虑 Crypto/Spaces 是如何产生的:1)项目开发商如何与项目所在地区建立寄生关系,以获取能源、基础设施和当地资源;2)项目如何促成 "虚拟土地掠夺",即开发商在无意将土地用于所宣称目的的情况下进行土地收购,并导致当地居民流离失所;以及3)区块链技术和投机性金融想象如何激发新的无政府资本主义加密乌托邦 "退出区",这些 "退出区 "通常位于全球南部。我们认为,加密货币项目远非一个零和虚拟游戏世界,而是寄生性的,往往需要掠夺贫困社区和其他边缘化社区的资源,吸纳新用户,并促成有利的监管。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
210
期刊介绍: Political Geography is the flagship journal of political geography and research on the spatial dimensions of politics. The journal brings together leading contributions in its field, promoting international and interdisciplinary communication. Research emphases cover all scales of inquiry and diverse theories, methods, and methodologies.
期刊最新文献
Fragmenting forest governance: Land tenure and the REDD+ paradox in Kigoma pilot project, Tanzania Assembling governance in São Paulo's "Cracolândia" Negotiating (under)development? Expanding bargaining power within globalised production networks “There, seated upon the toilet, apparently in the midst of defecation, was the president of the United States”: Toilets and elite politics in the USA and UK Making sense of clandestine graves: Material epistemology and the political geography of uncertain knowledge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1