Public collaboration to improve the future for science in Brazil

IF 4.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Science & Policy Pub Date : 2024-10-04 DOI:10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103921
Lucas Rodriguez Forti , Judit K. Szabo
{"title":"Public collaboration to improve the future for science in Brazil","authors":"Lucas Rodriguez Forti ,&nbsp;Judit K. Szabo","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Brazil is facing a concerning scientific crisis as a result of persistent anti-science campaigns, decreasing support for public universities and pro-environmental policies, exacerbated by investment cuts to scientific agencies. While recent pro-science policies could mitigate some of this damage, the inherited public distrust in science will potentially threaten scientific progress for years to come. Since trust in science is influenced by political ideologies, combating this distrust presents a formidable challenge, demanding a strategy for public engagement and attenuation of the effects of political polarisation on science and technology. Scientific citizenship is essential to improve the way society perceives science and implements science-based policies. Funding a federal citizen science bureau to support participatory initiatives of knowledge production could bring various benefits, including increased public acceptance of science and environment protection, compliance with international agreements and UN goals, as well as higher scientific literacy among the public. It could also recover the failing trust in science, expand support for current and future citizen science initiatives, and improve minorities’ access to scientific collaboration. In summary, it would provide a way to recover the role of science and thereby support public policies in Brazil with global benefits.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 103921"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901124002557","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Brazil is facing a concerning scientific crisis as a result of persistent anti-science campaigns, decreasing support for public universities and pro-environmental policies, exacerbated by investment cuts to scientific agencies. While recent pro-science policies could mitigate some of this damage, the inherited public distrust in science will potentially threaten scientific progress for years to come. Since trust in science is influenced by political ideologies, combating this distrust presents a formidable challenge, demanding a strategy for public engagement and attenuation of the effects of political polarisation on science and technology. Scientific citizenship is essential to improve the way society perceives science and implements science-based policies. Funding a federal citizen science bureau to support participatory initiatives of knowledge production could bring various benefits, including increased public acceptance of science and environment protection, compliance with international agreements and UN goals, as well as higher scientific literacy among the public. It could also recover the failing trust in science, expand support for current and future citizen science initiatives, and improve minorities’ access to scientific collaboration. In summary, it would provide a way to recover the role of science and thereby support public policies in Brazil with global benefits.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公众合作改善巴西科学的未来
巴西正面临着一场令人担忧的科学危机,原因是持续不断的反科学运动、对公立大学支持的减少以及亲环境政策,而对科学机构投资的削减又加剧了这一危机。虽然近期的亲科学政策可以减轻部分损害,但公众对科学的不信任将在未来数年内对科学进步构成潜在威胁。由于对科学的信任受到政治意识形态的影响,消除这种不信任是一项艰巨的挑战,需要制定公众参与战略,减轻政治两极化对科学技术的影响。科学公民意识对于改善社会对科学的认识和实施以科学为基础的政策至关重要。资助联邦公民科学局,支持知识生产的参与性倡议,可以带来各种好处,包括提高公众对科学和环境保护的接受度,遵守国际协议和联合国目标,以及提高公众的科学素养。它还可以恢复公众对科学的不信任,扩大对当前和未来公民科学活动的支持,改善少数群体参与科学合作的机会。总之,这将为恢复科学的作用提供一条途径,从而支持巴西的公共政策,使其惠及全球。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Science & Policy
Environmental Science & Policy 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
332
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Forest owners’ perceptions of machine learning: Insights from swedish forestry Understanding how landscape value and climate risk discourses can improve adaptation planning: Insights from Q-method Articulating futures: Community storylines and assisted ecosystem adaptation in the Great Barrier Reef Insights into the public engagement of coastal geoscientists Flood data platform governance: Identifying the technological and socio-technical approach(es) differences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1