{"title":"Automatic visual recognition, detection and classification of weeds in cotton fields based on machine vision","authors":"Muhammad Sohail Memon , Shuren Chen , Baoguo Shen , Runzhi Liang , Zhong Tang , Shuai Wang , Weiwei Zhou , Noreena Memon","doi":"10.1016/j.cropro.2024.106966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Crops and weeds are involved in a continuous competition for equal resources, which may result in a potential decrease in crop yields by up to 31% and an increase in the costs of agricultural inputs by up to 22% of cultivation. Weeds further impact crop production, and their detection is crucial for effective crop management. In this research, we targeted common weeds of cotton field, specifically i) <em>Digitaria sanguinalis</em> (L.) Scop, ii) <em>Amaranthus retroflexus</em> L., iii) <em>Acalypha australis</em>, L., iv) <em>Cephalanoplos segetum</em>, and v) <em>Chenopodium album</em> L. Additionally, image processing techniques such as grayscale conversion, binarization, and Gaussian and morphological filters were also utilized. These methods are based on machine vision and facilitate rapid and straightforward weed detection by segmenting, scrutinizing, and comparing input images. The plant height and area were obtained during cotton planting within 32 days and fitted to develop the growth law concerning planting days for achieving the function of distinguishing cotton from weeds. We conducted recognition experiments by dividing images into four quadrants and categorizing weeds as either inter-row or intra-row. Meanwhile, the inter-row planting information was used to identify weeds, and the leaf pixel area and circularity were used as the identification methods for intra-row weeds, which reduced the algorithm's running time and improved real-time performance. The experimental results indicated that the inter-row weed recognition rate was 89.4%, with an average processing time of 102ms. Whereas in the case of intra-row weeds, the recognition rate was measured at 84.6%, and the overall recognition rate for cotton was 85.0%, with a mean time consumption of 437ms. Furthermore, the present research underscores recent advancements such as machine vision and high-resolution imaging, which have significantly improved the accuracy of automated weed identification in cotton fields while acknowledging ongoing challenges and outlining future opportunities. By Integrating state-of-the-art technology with sustainable agricultural practices, implementing an intelligent system offers a viable approach toward efficient and environmentally friendly weed management in modern agriculture.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10785,"journal":{"name":"Crop Protection","volume":"187 ","pages":"Article 106966"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219424003946","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Crops and weeds are involved in a continuous competition for equal resources, which may result in a potential decrease in crop yields by up to 31% and an increase in the costs of agricultural inputs by up to 22% of cultivation. Weeds further impact crop production, and their detection is crucial for effective crop management. In this research, we targeted common weeds of cotton field, specifically i) Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop, ii) Amaranthus retroflexus L., iii) Acalypha australis, L., iv) Cephalanoplos segetum, and v) Chenopodium album L. Additionally, image processing techniques such as grayscale conversion, binarization, and Gaussian and morphological filters were also utilized. These methods are based on machine vision and facilitate rapid and straightforward weed detection by segmenting, scrutinizing, and comparing input images. The plant height and area were obtained during cotton planting within 32 days and fitted to develop the growth law concerning planting days for achieving the function of distinguishing cotton from weeds. We conducted recognition experiments by dividing images into four quadrants and categorizing weeds as either inter-row or intra-row. Meanwhile, the inter-row planting information was used to identify weeds, and the leaf pixel area and circularity were used as the identification methods for intra-row weeds, which reduced the algorithm's running time and improved real-time performance. The experimental results indicated that the inter-row weed recognition rate was 89.4%, with an average processing time of 102ms. Whereas in the case of intra-row weeds, the recognition rate was measured at 84.6%, and the overall recognition rate for cotton was 85.0%, with a mean time consumption of 437ms. Furthermore, the present research underscores recent advancements such as machine vision and high-resolution imaging, which have significantly improved the accuracy of automated weed identification in cotton fields while acknowledging ongoing challenges and outlining future opportunities. By Integrating state-of-the-art technology with sustainable agricultural practices, implementing an intelligent system offers a viable approach toward efficient and environmentally friendly weed management in modern agriculture.
期刊介绍:
The Editors of Crop Protection especially welcome papers describing an interdisciplinary approach showing how different control strategies can be integrated into practical pest management programs, covering high and low input agricultural systems worldwide. Crop Protection particularly emphasizes the practical aspects of control in the field and for protected crops, and includes work which may lead in the near future to more effective control. The journal does not duplicate the many existing excellent biological science journals, which deal mainly with the more fundamental aspects of plant pathology, applied zoology and weed science. Crop Protection covers all practical aspects of pest, disease and weed control, including the following topics:
-Abiotic damage-
Agronomic control methods-
Assessment of pest and disease damage-
Molecular methods for the detection and assessment of pests and diseases-
Biological control-
Biorational pesticides-
Control of animal pests of world crops-
Control of diseases of crop plants caused by microorganisms-
Control of weeds and integrated management-
Economic considerations-
Effects of plant growth regulators-
Environmental benefits of reduced pesticide use-
Environmental effects of pesticides-
Epidemiology of pests and diseases in relation to control-
GM Crops, and genetic engineering applications-
Importance and control of postharvest crop losses-
Integrated control-
Interrelationships and compatibility among different control strategies-
Invasive species as they relate to implications for crop protection-
Pesticide application methods-
Pest management-
Phytobiomes for pest and disease control-
Resistance management-
Sampling and monitoring schemes for diseases, nematodes, pests and weeds.