Unpacking “Social Vulnerability” and “Equity”: Critical Insights From Stormwater Climate Adaptation Research in the US Gulf Coast

S. J. Domingue, E. Goto, L. Maillard, T. Harrison, A. Basaraba
{"title":"Unpacking “Social Vulnerability” and “Equity”: Critical Insights From Stormwater Climate Adaptation Research in the US Gulf Coast","authors":"S. J. Domingue,&nbsp;E. Goto,&nbsp;L. Maillard,&nbsp;T. Harrison,&nbsp;A. Basaraba","doi":"10.1029/2023CSJ000068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper assesses how the concepts of <i>social vulnerability</i> and <i>equity</i> are discursively constructed in co-production research settings with a co-created decision support tool. The data was collected during workshops (32 communities represented) and interviews (24 communities represented) with stormwater managers and stakeholders (SMS) working in small cities, counties/parishes, and villages and towns within 100 miles of the US Gulf Coast. Findings from participant observation of workshops show that SMS express similar viewpoints regarding indicators of social vulnerability to climate-related hazards, often defining vulnerable people as less physically mobile or as having few monetary resources. Individuals articulated “community” through a lens of homeownership and often described their relationship to residents as strained. Findings from interviews reveal divergent viewpoints on the imperative and rationale for integrating social vulnerability data into stormwater assessments and planning. Interviews also generated more critical reflection than was present in workshops regarding racial disparities in flood hazard exposure. A key insight from this article is that tools and team composition matter but there is nuance in the degree to which they matter considering a range of contextual factors. The article argues that co-production teams must plan for alternatives and different scenarios given the messiness of co-production in practice and that research is needed to reveal the conditions under which specific tools matter for equity in terms of both process and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":93639,"journal":{"name":"Community science","volume":"3 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2023CSJ000068","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2023CSJ000068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper assesses how the concepts of social vulnerability and equity are discursively constructed in co-production research settings with a co-created decision support tool. The data was collected during workshops (32 communities represented) and interviews (24 communities represented) with stormwater managers and stakeholders (SMS) working in small cities, counties/parishes, and villages and towns within 100 miles of the US Gulf Coast. Findings from participant observation of workshops show that SMS express similar viewpoints regarding indicators of social vulnerability to climate-related hazards, often defining vulnerable people as less physically mobile or as having few monetary resources. Individuals articulated “community” through a lens of homeownership and often described their relationship to residents as strained. Findings from interviews reveal divergent viewpoints on the imperative and rationale for integrating social vulnerability data into stormwater assessments and planning. Interviews also generated more critical reflection than was present in workshops regarding racial disparities in flood hazard exposure. A key insight from this article is that tools and team composition matter but there is nuance in the degree to which they matter considering a range of contextual factors. The article argues that co-production teams must plan for alternatives and different scenarios given the messiness of co-production in practice and that research is needed to reveal the conditions under which specific tools matter for equity in terms of both process and outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解读 "社会脆弱性 "与 "公平":美国墨西哥湾沿岸暴雨气候适应研究的重要启示
本文通过一个共同创建的决策支持工具,评估了社会脆弱性和公平的概念是如何在共同生产的研究环境中进行话语建构的。数据是在研讨会(32 个社区代表)和访谈(24 个社区代表)中收集的,访谈对象是美国墨西哥湾沿岸 100 英里范围内的小城市、县/教区、村镇的雨水管理者和利益相关者(SMS)。与会者对研讨会的观察结果表明,雨水管理者和利益相关者对气候相关灾害的社会脆弱性指标表达了类似的观点,通常将弱势人群定义为身体活动能力较差或货币资源较少的人群。个人通过房屋所有权的视角来阐述 "社区",并经常描述他们与居民的关系紧张。访谈结果表明,在将社会脆弱性数据纳入暴雨评估和规划的必要性和合理性方面存在不同观点。在洪水灾害暴露的种族差异问题上,访谈也引发了比研讨会更多的批判性思考。本文的一个重要见解是,工具和团队组成很重要,但考虑到一系列背景因素,它们的重要程度也有细微差别。文章认为,鉴于共同生产在实践中的混乱性,共同生产团队必须为替代方案和不同情况制定计划,并且需要开展研究,以揭示在何种条件下特定工具在过程和结果两方面对公平都有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information “They Say the Water Is Perfectly Safe but…”: A Mixed-Methods Participatory Study of Factors Influencing Trust in Tap Water Safety in a Great Lakes City Validation of Traditional Pastoralist Practices Based on Ecological Observations of a Camel Herding Community and Coastal Mangrove Forests of Kutch, Gujarat, India A First Step in the Co-Production of a Climate Resilience Research Agenda for the Philadelphia Region A Co-Produced Workflow for Addressing Inequities in Cooling Center Access
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1