Toward an assessment of the relevance of proposed public policy in contemporary African society: A retrospective review of Kenya's now-defunct building bridges initiative, with special reference to post-election violence

IF 1.4 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Politics & Policy Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1111/polp.12630
Albert Gordon Omulo
{"title":"Toward an assessment of the relevance of proposed public policy in contemporary African society: A retrospective review of Kenya's now-defunct building bridges initiative, with special reference to post-election violence","authors":"Albert Gordon Omulo","doi":"10.1111/polp.12630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Whereas competing interests characterize the African public policy sphere today, the lens of mass-elite differences has hardly been employed to study electoral violence. Accordingly, this article juxtaposes the lived experiences of ordinary Kenyan citizens, obtained through focus groups, with the content of the now-defunct Building Bridges Initiative (BBI), a comprehensive set of public policy changes proposed by Kenya's political protagonists Uhuru Kenyatta and Raila Odinga in 2017. It poses the following broad question: did the BBI proposals truly intersect with the opinions and lived experiences of the masses? I find that various factors, including the lack of electoral and judicial integrity, and a winner-takes-all democratic system, are responsible for post-election violence according to citizens. A comparative analysis of citizen perspectives and the BBI Report reveals considerable congruence in the understanding of the causes of post-election violence. The study partly concludes that African leaders should continue to engage in policy entrepreneurship.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Related Articles</h3>\n \n <p>Hodzi, Obert. 2020. “African Political Elites and the Making(s) of the China Model in Africa.” <i>Politics &amp; Policy</i> 48(5): 887–987. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12380.</p>\n \n <p>Kouladoum, Jean-Claude. 2023. “The Role of Freedom of Communication in Modulating the Effect of Political Participation on Electoral Outcome in Africa.” <i>Politics &amp; Policy</i> 51(4): 588–613. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12539.</p>\n \n <p>Onyango, Gedion. 2024. “DHR-PA—Democracy and Human Rights in Public Administration in Africa.” <i>Politics &amp; Policy</i> 52(2): 426–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12584.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51679,"journal":{"name":"Politics & Policy","volume":"52 5","pages":"1013-1037"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/polp.12630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Whereas competing interests characterize the African public policy sphere today, the lens of mass-elite differences has hardly been employed to study electoral violence. Accordingly, this article juxtaposes the lived experiences of ordinary Kenyan citizens, obtained through focus groups, with the content of the now-defunct Building Bridges Initiative (BBI), a comprehensive set of public policy changes proposed by Kenya's political protagonists Uhuru Kenyatta and Raila Odinga in 2017. It poses the following broad question: did the BBI proposals truly intersect with the opinions and lived experiences of the masses? I find that various factors, including the lack of electoral and judicial integrity, and a winner-takes-all democratic system, are responsible for post-election violence according to citizens. A comparative analysis of citizen perspectives and the BBI Report reveals considerable congruence in the understanding of the causes of post-election violence. The study partly concludes that African leaders should continue to engage in policy entrepreneurship.

Related Articles

Hodzi, Obert. 2020. “African Political Elites and the Making(s) of the China Model in Africa.” Politics & Policy 48(5): 887–987. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12380.

Kouladoum, Jean-Claude. 2023. “The Role of Freedom of Communication in Modulating the Effect of Political Participation on Electoral Outcome in Africa.” Politics & Policy 51(4): 588–613. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12539.

Onyango, Gedion. 2024. “DHR-PA—Democracy and Human Rights in Public Administration in Africa.” Politics & Policy 52(2): 426–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12584.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估拟议公共政策在当代非洲社会中的相关性:回顾肯尼亚现已停止的 "架设桥梁 "倡议,特别是选举后暴力问题
利益之争是当今非洲公共政策领域的特点,而大众-精英差异的视角却几乎未被用于研究选举暴力。因此,本文将通过焦点小组获得的普通肯尼亚公民的生活经验与现已失效的 "架设桥梁倡议"(Building Bridges Initiative,BBI)的内容并列起来,后者是肯尼亚政治主角乌胡鲁-肯雅塔(Uhuru Kenyatta)和拉伊拉-奥廷加(Raila Odinga)在 2017 年提出的一整套公共政策变革。它提出了以下广泛的问题:《桥梁倡议》的建议是否真正与群众的意见和生活经验相交融?我发现,根据公民的观点,包括缺乏选举和司法诚信以及赢家通吃的民主制度在内的各种因素都是造成选举后暴力的原因。对公民观点和《预算与预算报告》的比较分析表明,人们对选举后暴力原因的理解相当一致。研究得出的部分结论是,非洲领导人应继续参与政策创业。 相关文章 Hodzi, Obert.2020."非洲政治精英与中国模式在非洲的形成》。Politics & Policy 48(5):887–987. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12380. Kouladoum, Jean-Claude.2023."通讯自由在调节非洲政治参与对选举结果影响中的作用》。Politics & Policy 51(4):588–613. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12539. Onyango, Gedion.2024."DHR-PA-Democracy and Human Rights in Public Administration in Africa.Politics & Policy 52(2):426–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12584.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Politics & Policy
Politics & Policy POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
23.10%
发文量
61
期刊最新文献
Issue Information “Where you stand depends on where you sit”: The politics of petroleum pricing in Ghana's election cycle Note from the Editor and Acknowledgment of Reviewers 2023–2024 A paradox of public engagement: The discursive politics of environmental justice in Canada's Chemical Valley Democratic interventionists versus pragmatic realists: Employing the advocacy coalition framework to explain Obama's shift in multilateralism with European allies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1