Shunliu Zhao, Petros Vasilakos, Anas Alhusban, Yasar Burak Oztaner, Alan Krupnick, Howard Chang, Armistead Russell and Amir Hakami*,
{"title":"Spatiotemporally Detailed Quantification of Air Quality Benefits of Emissions Reductions–Part I: Benefit-per-Ton Estimates for Canada and the U.S.","authors":"Shunliu Zhao, Petros Vasilakos, Anas Alhusban, Yasar Burak Oztaner, Alan Krupnick, Howard Chang, Armistead Russell and Amir Hakami*, ","doi":"10.1021/acsestair.4c0012710.1021/acsestair.4c00127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The U.S. EPA’s Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ)-adjoint model is used to map monetized health benefits (defined here as benefits of reduced mortality from chronic PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure) in the form of benefits per ton (of emissions reduced) for the U.S. and Canada for NOx, SO<sub>2</sub>, ammonia, and primary PM<sub>2.5</sub> emissions. The adjoint model provides benefits per ton (BPTs) that are location-specific and applicable to various sectors. BPTs show significant variability across locations, such that only 20% of primary PM<sub>2.5</sub> emissions in each country makes up more than half of its burden. The greatest benefits in terms of BPTs are for primary PM<sub>2.5</sub> reductions, followed by ammonia. Seasonal differences in benefits vary by pollutant: while PM<sub>2.5</sub> benefits remain high across seasons, BPTs for reducing ammonia are much higher in the winter due to the increased ammonium nitrate formation efficiency. Based on our location-specific BPTs, we estimate a total of 91,000 U.S. premature mortalities attributable to natural and anthropogenic emissions.</p><p >Due to the spatiotemporal variabilities in benefit per ton of emission reductions, reducing 20% of the primary emissions would result in over half the societal health benefits in both the U.S. and Canada.</p>","PeriodicalId":100014,"journal":{"name":"ACS ES&T Air","volume":"1 10","pages":"1215–1226 1215–1226"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acsestair.4c00127","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS ES&T Air","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestair.4c00127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The U.S. EPA’s Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ)-adjoint model is used to map monetized health benefits (defined here as benefits of reduced mortality from chronic PM2.5 exposure) in the form of benefits per ton (of emissions reduced) for the U.S. and Canada for NOx, SO2, ammonia, and primary PM2.5 emissions. The adjoint model provides benefits per ton (BPTs) that are location-specific and applicable to various sectors. BPTs show significant variability across locations, such that only 20% of primary PM2.5 emissions in each country makes up more than half of its burden. The greatest benefits in terms of BPTs are for primary PM2.5 reductions, followed by ammonia. Seasonal differences in benefits vary by pollutant: while PM2.5 benefits remain high across seasons, BPTs for reducing ammonia are much higher in the winter due to the increased ammonium nitrate formation efficiency. Based on our location-specific BPTs, we estimate a total of 91,000 U.S. premature mortalities attributable to natural and anthropogenic emissions.
Due to the spatiotemporal variabilities in benefit per ton of emission reductions, reducing 20% of the primary emissions would result in over half the societal health benefits in both the U.S. and Canada.