Prezygotic barriers effectively limit hybridization in a rapid evolutionary radiation

IF 8.3 1区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES New Phytologist Pub Date : 2024-10-14 DOI:10.1111/nph.20187
Kathryn A. Uckele, Oscar M. Vargas, Kathleen M. Kay
{"title":"Prezygotic barriers effectively limit hybridization in a rapid evolutionary radiation","authors":"Kathryn A. Uckele, Oscar M. Vargas, Kathleen M. Kay","doi":"10.1111/nph.20187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h2> Introduction</h2>\n<p>A growing body of research suggests that hybridization is more prevalent across the tree of life than previously thought, challenging traditional views of speciation as a strictly bifurcating process (Mallet <i>et al</i>., <span>2016</span>; Dagilis <i>et al</i>., <span>2022</span>). Genome-scale data have illuminated the extent to which ancient hybridization has reshaped the genomes of many extant species (Moran <i>et al</i>., <span>2021</span>), including our own (Sankararaman <i>et al</i>., <span>2016</span>), spurring interest in the evolutionary causes and consequences of hybridization.</p>\n<p>Hybridization is common in plants (Stebbins, <span>1969</span>; Whitney <i>et al</i>., <span>2010</span>) and has shaped genetic variation across numerous plant lineages (Arnold, <span>1997</span>). However, varying rates of hybridization among different plant clades suggest this process has played a more significant role in some lineages than others (Whitney <i>et al</i>., <span>2010</span>; Barker <i>et al</i>., <span>2016</span>). In angiosperms, hybridization frequently precedes evolutionary innovations and the origin of new lineages. Allopolyploidization, a prevalent mode of hybrid speciation in plants, is implicated in the origin of over 10% of species in a survey of 47 vascular plant genera (Barker <i>et al</i>., <span>2016</span>). By contrast, homoploid hybrid species, which arise without a change in ploidy, are thought to be rarer and require strong extrinsic barriers to occur (Buerkle <i>et al</i>., <span>2000</span>; Abbott <i>et al</i>., <span>2010</span>).</p>\n<p>Introgression, another common outcome of hybridization, has been the focus of recent research on adaptation and speciation in plants (Le Corre <i>et al</i>., <span>2020</span>; Todesco <i>et al</i>., <span>2020</span>; Nelson <i>et al</i>., <span>2021</span>). Introgression involves the transfer of genetic material through backcrossing, where hybrids mate with pure individuals. The extent and direction of introgression can inform our understanding of reproductive isolation and adaptation. For example, asymmetric introgression, where backcrossing favors one parental species over the other, can reflect asymmetry in reproductive isolation (Arnold <i>et al</i>., <span>2008</span>). Additionally, the proportion of the genome inherited through interspecific gene flow can shed light on the strength and genetic basis of reproductive barriers (Borge <i>et al</i>., <span>2005</span>; Currat &amp; Excoffier, <span>2011</span>), though neutral abiotic factors and demographic and genetic processes may also influence the extent and direction of introgression (Currat <i>et al</i>., <span>2008</span>; Bertola <i>et al</i>., <span>2020</span>).</p>\n<p>Recent studies increasingly highlight the adaptive role of introgression in transferring beneficial alleles among species (Stankowski &amp; Streisfeld, <span>2015</span>; Lewis <i>et al</i>., <span>2019</span>; Todesco <i>et al</i>., <span>2020</span>; Baiz <i>et al</i>., <span>2021</span>). Adaptive introgression is believed to underlie the rapid diversification of many adaptive radiations, including Darwin's finches (Grant &amp; Grant, <span>2019</span>), <i>Heliconius</i> butterflies (Pardo-Diaz <i>et al</i>., <span>2012</span>), and <i>Rhagoletis</i> fruit flies (Feder <i>et al</i>., <span>2005</span>). While reproductive barriers are critical to the balance between hybridization and speciation, we are still in the early stages of identifying the specific barriers that influence the frequency and outcome of hybridization over macroevolutionary timescales.</p>\n<p>Phylogenomic datasets and coalescent-based phylogenetic approaches have significantly enhanced our ability to resolve complex evolutionary histories, including rapid and recent evolutionary radiations (Meyer <i>et al</i>., <span>2017</span>; Irisarri <i>et al</i>., <span>2018</span>; Suvorov <i>et al</i>., <span>2022</span>), providing valuable resources for subsequent analyses of introgression. Additionally, genome-scale datasets and advances in analytical approaches have improved our ability to document fine-scale patterns of hybrid ancestry across the genomes of diverse species (Sankararaman <i>et al</i>., <span>2016</span>; Schumer <i>et al</i>., <span>2018</span>) and characterize patterns of introgression across entire clades (Morales-Briones <i>et al</i>., <span>2018a</span>; Suvorov <i>et al</i>., <span>2022</span>). There are numerous approaches that detect introgression within a phylogenetic context, ranging in complexity from ‘test-based’ approaches that fit a simple phylogenetic tree model to a species quartet (e.g. <i>D</i>-statistic) to parameter-rich ‘model-based’ approaches that fit complex historical graph models (e.g. phylogenetic network inference). The <i>D</i>-statistic and related tests (Green <i>et al</i>., <span>2010</span>; Durand <i>et al</i>., <span>2011</span>) are performed on three in-group taxa or populations at a time, and an outgroup taxon or population is used to polarize ancestral states. To characterize introgression across a phylogeny, tests may be conducted exhaustively across all possible trios of populations or taxa. By contrast, model-based Bayesian and likelihood methods utilize data from all samples simultaneously to extensively explore phylogenetic network space and jointly estimate the species tree topology and hybridization events. While powerful, network inference is computationally challenging, and current approaches are limited to small datasets. Alternatively, systems of three and four-sample tests are computationally tractable and generally more robust to common model violations (Hibbins &amp; Hahn, <span>2022</span>). Still, they can become difficult to interpret when large numbers of correlated tests are significant. In this study, we leverage both model-based and test-based methods to detect introgression across the spiral ginger (<i>Costus</i>, Costaceae) radiation of Central and South America (hereafter referred to as American <i>Costus</i>).</p>\n<p><i>Costus</i> represents one of the fastest known plant radiations, with recent estimates suggesting that 78 species have arisen over the last <i>c</i>. 3 million years (Myr) (Vargas <i>et al</i>., <span>2020</span>; Maas <i>et al</i>., <span>2023</span>). Recent phylogenetic analyses (Valderrama <i>et al</i>., <span>2020</span>; Vargas <i>et al</i>., <span>2020</span>) have provided well-supported hypotheses for this clade despite extensive genealogical discordance. However, the extent to which hybridization contributed to observed levels of gene tree conflict is unknown. American <i>Costus</i> species are widely interfertile in experimental crosses (Kay &amp; Schemske, <span>2008</span>) and retain consistent ploidy and high-genomic synteny across the deepest phylogenetic nodes (Harenčár <i>et al</i>., <span>2023</span>). Whereas <i>Costus</i> species are often found in broad geographic sympatry (Vargas <i>et al</i>., <span>2020</span>), hybrid zones are rare in the field (Chen &amp; Schemske, <span>2015</span>), forming only occasionally in areas of anthropogenic disturbance (Sytsma &amp; Pippen, <span>1985</span>; Surget-Groba &amp; Kay, <span>2013</span>). Hybridization may be curtailed in <i>Costus</i> by predominantly prezygotic reproductive isolating barriers, especially ecogeographic and floral isolation, which have been studied extensively in the genus (Kay &amp; Schemske, <span>2003</span>; Kay, <span>2006</span>; Chen &amp; Schemske, <span>2015</span>). Prior research has shown that potential pollen flow among sympatric species is significantly reduced between species with divergent pollination syndromes (bee vs hummingbird) (Kay &amp; Schemske, <span>2003</span>) and even between morphologically divergent species that share pollinators (Kay, <span>2006</span>; Chen, <span>2013</span>). A recent ancestral state reconstruction of pollination syndrome suggests that there have been numerous independent transitions from euglossine bee to hummingbird pollination characterized by evolutionary convergence in key floral traits that increase visitation by hummingbirds or deter bees (Kay &amp; Grossenbacher, <span>2022</span>).</p>\n<p>We used phylogenetic approaches to detect clade-wide signatures of introgression across 54 American <i>Costus</i> taxa using a phylogenomic dataset of 756 genes. Our analyses ranged from simple four-taxon tests to parameter-rich model-based approaches. We detected evidence for a moderate number of introgression events in American <i>Costus</i>, including one event that mapped to one of the earliest divergences in the radiation. All but one of these events occurred between taxa or lineages that share the same pollination syndrome (e.g. both bee-pollinated or both hummingbird-pollinated), suggesting that pollinator specialization plays an important role in maintaining species boundaries.</p>","PeriodicalId":214,"journal":{"name":"New Phytologist","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Phytologist","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.20187","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

A growing body of research suggests that hybridization is more prevalent across the tree of life than previously thought, challenging traditional views of speciation as a strictly bifurcating process (Mallet et al., 2016; Dagilis et al., 2022). Genome-scale data have illuminated the extent to which ancient hybridization has reshaped the genomes of many extant species (Moran et al., 2021), including our own (Sankararaman et al., 2016), spurring interest in the evolutionary causes and consequences of hybridization.

Hybridization is common in plants (Stebbins, 1969; Whitney et al., 2010) and has shaped genetic variation across numerous plant lineages (Arnold, 1997). However, varying rates of hybridization among different plant clades suggest this process has played a more significant role in some lineages than others (Whitney et al., 2010; Barker et al., 2016). In angiosperms, hybridization frequently precedes evolutionary innovations and the origin of new lineages. Allopolyploidization, a prevalent mode of hybrid speciation in plants, is implicated in the origin of over 10% of species in a survey of 47 vascular plant genera (Barker et al., 2016). By contrast, homoploid hybrid species, which arise without a change in ploidy, are thought to be rarer and require strong extrinsic barriers to occur (Buerkle et al., 2000; Abbott et al., 2010).

Introgression, another common outcome of hybridization, has been the focus of recent research on adaptation and speciation in plants (Le Corre et al., 2020; Todesco et al., 2020; Nelson et al., 2021). Introgression involves the transfer of genetic material through backcrossing, where hybrids mate with pure individuals. The extent and direction of introgression can inform our understanding of reproductive isolation and adaptation. For example, asymmetric introgression, where backcrossing favors one parental species over the other, can reflect asymmetry in reproductive isolation (Arnold et al., 2008). Additionally, the proportion of the genome inherited through interspecific gene flow can shed light on the strength and genetic basis of reproductive barriers (Borge et al., 2005; Currat & Excoffier, 2011), though neutral abiotic factors and demographic and genetic processes may also influence the extent and direction of introgression (Currat et al., 2008; Bertola et al., 2020).

Recent studies increasingly highlight the adaptive role of introgression in transferring beneficial alleles among species (Stankowski & Streisfeld, 2015; Lewis et al., 2019; Todesco et al., 2020; Baiz et al., 2021). Adaptive introgression is believed to underlie the rapid diversification of many adaptive radiations, including Darwin's finches (Grant & Grant, 2019), Heliconius butterflies (Pardo-Diaz et al., 2012), and Rhagoletis fruit flies (Feder et al., 2005). While reproductive barriers are critical to the balance between hybridization and speciation, we are still in the early stages of identifying the specific barriers that influence the frequency and outcome of hybridization over macroevolutionary timescales.

Phylogenomic datasets and coalescent-based phylogenetic approaches have significantly enhanced our ability to resolve complex evolutionary histories, including rapid and recent evolutionary radiations (Meyer et al., 2017; Irisarri et al., 2018; Suvorov et al., 2022), providing valuable resources for subsequent analyses of introgression. Additionally, genome-scale datasets and advances in analytical approaches have improved our ability to document fine-scale patterns of hybrid ancestry across the genomes of diverse species (Sankararaman et al., 2016; Schumer et al., 2018) and characterize patterns of introgression across entire clades (Morales-Briones et al., 2018a; Suvorov et al., 2022). There are numerous approaches that detect introgression within a phylogenetic context, ranging in complexity from ‘test-based’ approaches that fit a simple phylogenetic tree model to a species quartet (e.g. D-statistic) to parameter-rich ‘model-based’ approaches that fit complex historical graph models (e.g. phylogenetic network inference). The D-statistic and related tests (Green et al., 2010; Durand et al., 2011) are performed on three in-group taxa or populations at a time, and an outgroup taxon or population is used to polarize ancestral states. To characterize introgression across a phylogeny, tests may be conducted exhaustively across all possible trios of populations or taxa. By contrast, model-based Bayesian and likelihood methods utilize data from all samples simultaneously to extensively explore phylogenetic network space and jointly estimate the species tree topology and hybridization events. While powerful, network inference is computationally challenging, and current approaches are limited to small datasets. Alternatively, systems of three and four-sample tests are computationally tractable and generally more robust to common model violations (Hibbins & Hahn, 2022). Still, they can become difficult to interpret when large numbers of correlated tests are significant. In this study, we leverage both model-based and test-based methods to detect introgression across the spiral ginger (Costus, Costaceae) radiation of Central and South America (hereafter referred to as American Costus).

Costus represents one of the fastest known plant radiations, with recent estimates suggesting that 78 species have arisen over the last c. 3 million years (Myr) (Vargas et al., 2020; Maas et al., 2023). Recent phylogenetic analyses (Valderrama et al., 2020; Vargas et al., 2020) have provided well-supported hypotheses for this clade despite extensive genealogical discordance. However, the extent to which hybridization contributed to observed levels of gene tree conflict is unknown. American Costus species are widely interfertile in experimental crosses (Kay & Schemske, 2008) and retain consistent ploidy and high-genomic synteny across the deepest phylogenetic nodes (Harenčár et al., 2023). Whereas Costus species are often found in broad geographic sympatry (Vargas et al., 2020), hybrid zones are rare in the field (Chen & Schemske, 2015), forming only occasionally in areas of anthropogenic disturbance (Sytsma & Pippen, 1985; Surget-Groba & Kay, 2013). Hybridization may be curtailed in Costus by predominantly prezygotic reproductive isolating barriers, especially ecogeographic and floral isolation, which have been studied extensively in the genus (Kay & Schemske, 2003; Kay, 2006; Chen & Schemske, 2015). Prior research has shown that potential pollen flow among sympatric species is significantly reduced between species with divergent pollination syndromes (bee vs hummingbird) (Kay & Schemske, 2003) and even between morphologically divergent species that share pollinators (Kay, 2006; Chen, 2013). A recent ancestral state reconstruction of pollination syndrome suggests that there have been numerous independent transitions from euglossine bee to hummingbird pollination characterized by evolutionary convergence in key floral traits that increase visitation by hummingbirds or deter bees (Kay & Grossenbacher, 2022).

We used phylogenetic approaches to detect clade-wide signatures of introgression across 54 American Costus taxa using a phylogenomic dataset of 756 genes. Our analyses ranged from simple four-taxon tests to parameter-rich model-based approaches. We detected evidence for a moderate number of introgression events in American Costus, including one event that mapped to one of the earliest divergences in the radiation. All but one of these events occurred between taxa or lineages that share the same pollination syndrome (e.g. both bee-pollinated or both hummingbird-pollinated), suggesting that pollinator specialization plays an important role in maintaining species boundaries.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在快速进化辐射中,前卵障碍有效限制了杂交
然而,当大量相关测试结果显著时,这些方法就难以解释了。在本研究中,我们利用基于模型和基于检验的方法来检测中美洲和南美洲螺旋姜(Costus,姜科)辐射(以下简称美洲螺旋姜)的引种情况。螺旋姜是已知植物辐射速度最快的植物之一,最近的估计表明,在过去约 300 万年(Myr)的时间里,已经出现了 78 个物种(Vargas 等人,2020 年;Maas 等人,2023 年)。最近的系统发育分析(Valderrama 等人,2020 年;Vargas 等人,2020 年)为这一支系提供了很好的假说支持,尽管在谱系上存在广泛的不一致。然而,杂交在多大程度上导致了所观察到的基因树冲突水平尚不清楚。在实验杂交中,美洲柯斯特斯物种广泛互交(Kay &amp; Schemske, 2008),并在最深的系统发育节点上保持一致的倍性和高基因组同源性(Harenčár 等人,2023 年)。虽然 Costus 物种经常被发现在广泛的地理上共生(Vargas 等人,2020 年),但杂交区在野外却很罕见(Chen &amp; Schemske, 2015 年),仅偶尔在人为干扰地区形成(Sytsma &amp; Pippen, 1985 年;Surget-Groba &amp; Kay, 2013 年)。在科斯特斯属中,杂交可能主要受到同父异母前生殖隔离障碍的限制,特别是生态地理隔离和花隔离,这在科斯特斯属中已被广泛研究(Kay &amp; Schemske, 2003; Kay, 2006; Chen &amp; Schemske, 2015)。先前的研究表明,同域物种之间的潜在花粉流在授粉方式不同(蜜蜂与蜂鸟)的物种之间会显著减少(Kay &amp; Schemske, 2003),甚至在共享授粉者的形态不同物种之间也会减少(Kay, 2006; Chen, 2013)。最近对传粉综合征的祖先状态重建表明,从蜜蜂传粉到蜂鸟传粉存在多次独立的过渡,其特点是关键花卉性状的进化趋同,这些性状增加了蜂鸟的造访或阻止了蜜蜂的造访(Kay &amp; Grossenbacher, 2022)。我们的分析包括从简单的四分类群测试到参数丰富的基于模型的方法。我们在美洲柯斯特斯类群中发现了一定数量的引种事件,其中一个事件与辐射中最早的分化之一相吻合。除一次外,所有这些事件都发生在具有相同授粉综合征的类群或品系之间(如都由蜜蜂授粉或都由蜂鸟授粉),这表明授粉者的专业化在维持物种边界方面发挥了重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
New Phytologist
New Phytologist 生物-植物科学
自引率
5.30%
发文量
728
期刊介绍: New Phytologist is an international electronic journal published 24 times a year. It is owned by the New Phytologist Foundation, a non-profit-making charitable organization dedicated to promoting plant science. The journal publishes excellent, novel, rigorous, and timely research and scholarship in plant science and its applications. The articles cover topics in five sections: Physiology & Development, Environment, Interaction, Evolution, and Transformative Plant Biotechnology. These sections encompass intracellular processes, global environmental change, and encourage cross-disciplinary approaches. The journal recognizes the use of techniques from molecular and cell biology, functional genomics, modeling, and system-based approaches in plant science. Abstracting and Indexing Information for New Phytologist includes Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, Agroforestry Abstracts, Biochemistry & Biophysics Citation Index, Botanical Pesticides, CAB Abstracts®, Environment Index, Global Health, and Plant Breeding Abstracts, and others.
期刊最新文献
Meta-analysis reveals globally sourced commercial mycorrhizal inoculants fall short Trade-offs involved in the choice of pot vs field experiments Herbicidal interference: glyphosate drives both the ecology and evolution of plant–herbivore interactions Matthew Naish A nuclear phylogenomic tree of grasses (Poaceae) recovers current classification despite gene tree incongruence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1