Marwa Ameen , Dunia Alhadi , Manal Almaslamani , Abdul Rahman Saleh
{"title":"Impact of using single-file reciprocating system on the quality of root canal treatment treated by undergraduate students","authors":"Marwa Ameen , Dunia Alhadi , Manal Almaslamani , Abdul Rahman Saleh","doi":"10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.08.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the use of a single-file reciprocating system on the technical quality of root canal filling and treatment by radiographic assessment of cases treated by undergraduate dental students.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>This was a retrospective cross-sectional clinical study of endodontically treatments conducted by fourth-year undergraduate students during the academic year 2021–2022. Root canal preparation was performed using the WaveOne Gold system with matching single-cone gutta-percha. The collected data included sex, tooth position, number of canals, and treatment time (first or second semester). The quality of the root canal filling was assessed based on the root canal filling length, density, and taper. The presence of ledges, apical transportation, perforation, and instrument separation were recorded. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 28. Chi-square tests were used, and the statistical significance level was set at P < 0.05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 601 teeth were included. The length of the root canal filling was adequate in 93.51 % of the teeth, underfilled in 2.82 %, and overfilled in 3.66 %. The density and taper were adequate in 96.5 % and 98.16 % of the teeth, respectively. There were no significant differences among the parameters of length, taper, density, or procedural errors relative to the arch type. However, there was a significant difference between the anterior and premolar teeth in terms of taper, density, and overall quality of the root canal filling. The overall quality of root canal treatment was acceptable in 527 teeth (87.68 %), with no significant difference between teeth (P = 0.256).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The quality of root canal treatment performed by undergraduate students using a single-file reciprocating system is good or acceptable.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47246,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Dental Journal","volume":"36 10","pages":"Pages 1369-1375"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905224002517","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
This study aimed to evaluate the use of a single-file reciprocating system on the technical quality of root canal filling and treatment by radiographic assessment of cases treated by undergraduate dental students.
Materials and methods
This was a retrospective cross-sectional clinical study of endodontically treatments conducted by fourth-year undergraduate students during the academic year 2021–2022. Root canal preparation was performed using the WaveOne Gold system with matching single-cone gutta-percha. The collected data included sex, tooth position, number of canals, and treatment time (first or second semester). The quality of the root canal filling was assessed based on the root canal filling length, density, and taper. The presence of ledges, apical transportation, perforation, and instrument separation were recorded. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 28. Chi-square tests were used, and the statistical significance level was set at P < 0.05.
Results
A total of 601 teeth were included. The length of the root canal filling was adequate in 93.51 % of the teeth, underfilled in 2.82 %, and overfilled in 3.66 %. The density and taper were adequate in 96.5 % and 98.16 % of the teeth, respectively. There were no significant differences among the parameters of length, taper, density, or procedural errors relative to the arch type. However, there was a significant difference between the anterior and premolar teeth in terms of taper, density, and overall quality of the root canal filling. The overall quality of root canal treatment was acceptable in 527 teeth (87.68 %), with no significant difference between teeth (P = 0.256).
Conclusion
The quality of root canal treatment performed by undergraduate students using a single-file reciprocating system is good or acceptable.
期刊介绍:
Saudi Dental Journal is an English language, peer-reviewed scholarly publication in the area of dentistry. Saudi Dental Journal publishes original research and reviews on, but not limited to: • dental disease • clinical trials • dental equipment • new and experimental techniques • epidemiology and oral health • restorative dentistry • periodontology • endodontology • prosthodontics • paediatric dentistry • orthodontics and dental education Saudi Dental Journal is the official publication of the Saudi Dental Society and is published by King Saud University in collaboration with Elsevier and is edited by an international group of eminent researchers.