Deconstructing adoption intentions: Water-fertilizer technology in 629 households

IF 9.8 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environmental Impact Assessment Review Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107691
Zhaohong Wu , Wenyuan Hua , Congcong Gao , Jie Zhu , Liangguo Luo
{"title":"Deconstructing adoption intentions: Water-fertilizer technology in 629 households","authors":"Zhaohong Wu ,&nbsp;Wenyuan Hua ,&nbsp;Congcong Gao ,&nbsp;Jie Zhu ,&nbsp;Liangguo Luo","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study addresses the research gap in understanding the complex relationships influencing farmers' intentions to adopt new water-fertilizer technologies, particularly focusing on the interactions among these factors. The innovation of this research lies in the novel integration of Probit and adversarial interpretive structure models. This combination reveals detailed dynamics and influence rankings among factors, providing a layered understanding of their interactions. Additionally, the study bridges theory and practice by surveying 629 small-scale farmers. The analysis identifies education level as a key determinant, with each unit increase raising the likelihood of technology adoption by 6.2 %. Adequate wheat irrigation increases adoption by 11.8 %, access to extension personnel by 16.3 %, and agricultural income comprising over 50 % of household income by 20.6 %. These findings have practical significance for promoting sustainable agricultural technologies in arid regions, aiming to reduce water and fertilizer inputs while ensuring food security and minimizing production costs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 107691"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925524002786","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study addresses the research gap in understanding the complex relationships influencing farmers' intentions to adopt new water-fertilizer technologies, particularly focusing on the interactions among these factors. The innovation of this research lies in the novel integration of Probit and adversarial interpretive structure models. This combination reveals detailed dynamics and influence rankings among factors, providing a layered understanding of their interactions. Additionally, the study bridges theory and practice by surveying 629 small-scale farmers. The analysis identifies education level as a key determinant, with each unit increase raising the likelihood of technology adoption by 6.2 %. Adequate wheat irrigation increases adoption by 11.8 %, access to extension personnel by 16.3 %, and agricultural income comprising over 50 % of household income by 20.6 %. These findings have practical significance for promoting sustainable agricultural technologies in arid regions, aiming to reduce water and fertilizer inputs while ensuring food security and minimizing production costs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解构采用意愿:629 个家庭的水肥技术
本研究填补了在理解影响农民采用水肥新技术意愿的复杂关系方面的研究空白,尤其侧重于这些因素之间的相互作用。本研究的创新之处在于将 Probit 模型和对抗性解释结构模型进行了新颖的整合。这种结合揭示了各因素之间的详细动态和影响等级,提供了对其相互作用的多层次理解。此外,本研究还通过对 629 名小规模农户进行调查,在理论与实践之间架起了一座桥梁。分析表明,教育水平是一个关键的决定因素,每增加一个单位,采用技术的可能性就会提高 6.2%。充足的小麦灌溉可使采用技术的可能性提高 11.8%,获得推广人员帮助的可能性提高 16.3%,农业收入占家庭收入 50%以上的可能性提高 20.6%。这些研究结果对于在干旱地区推广可持续农业技术具有实际意义,其目的是减少水和化肥的投入,同时确保粮食安全并最大限度地降低生产成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
期刊最新文献
When differentiated carbon tax policy meets LBD of renewable energy and electrification of energy end-use: Policy implications of sectoral differentiation of carbon productivity and carbon emission Climate policy and carbon leakage: Evidence from the low-carbon city pilot program in China Reducing fertilizer and pesticide application through mandatory agri-environmental regulation: Insights from “Two Zero” policy in China Unveiling the heterogeneity of environmental impacts of China's coal washing plants by a configuration-specific life cycle assessment Moving in the landscape: Omnidirectional connectivity dynamics in China from 1985 to 2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1