Efficacy and safety of mucolytics in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 2.4 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Respiratory investigation Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1016/j.resinv.2024.10.004
Hiroshi Ohnishi , Takuya Tanimoto , Ryunosuke Inaba , Masamitsu Eitoku
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of mucolytics in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Hiroshi Ohnishi ,&nbsp;Takuya Tanimoto ,&nbsp;Ryunosuke Inaba ,&nbsp;Masamitsu Eitoku","doi":"10.1016/j.resinv.2024.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The efficacy and safety of mucolytics in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and chronic bronchitis or exacerbations of COPD have been reported. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of mucolytics in patients with stable COPD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Reports from randomized controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mucolytics, including ambroxol, bromhexine, carbocisteine, erdosteine, fudosteine, <span>l</span>-methylcysteine, and N-acetylcysteine used in patients with stable COPD were searched for in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and the Igaku Cyuo Zasshi database.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-three reports with ambroxol, carbocisteine, erdosteine, <span>l</span>-methylcysteine, or N-acetylcysteine were included in the review. Mucolytics significantly reduced the rates of exacerbation and hospitalization, shortened the duration of antibiotic use and exacerbations, prolonged the time to first exacerbation, and had a tendency to reduce the occurrence of two or more exacerbations in patients with stable COPD compared to placebo. Mucolytics did not improve mortality, number of lost workdays, scores on St. George's respiratory questionnaire, forced expiratory volume in 1 s, or forced vital capacity. The safety profile of mucolytics was comparable to that of placebo.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Mucolytics reduce exacerbations and hospitalizations in patients with stable COPD and have a safety profile comparable to that of placebo.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20934,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory investigation","volume":"62 6","pages":"Pages 1168-1175"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory investigation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212534524001618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The efficacy and safety of mucolytics in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and chronic bronchitis or exacerbations of COPD have been reported. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of mucolytics in patients with stable COPD.

Methods

Reports from randomized controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mucolytics, including ambroxol, bromhexine, carbocisteine, erdosteine, fudosteine, l-methylcysteine, and N-acetylcysteine used in patients with stable COPD were searched for in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and the Igaku Cyuo Zasshi database.

Results

Twenty-three reports with ambroxol, carbocisteine, erdosteine, l-methylcysteine, or N-acetylcysteine were included in the review. Mucolytics significantly reduced the rates of exacerbation and hospitalization, shortened the duration of antibiotic use and exacerbations, prolonged the time to first exacerbation, and had a tendency to reduce the occurrence of two or more exacerbations in patients with stable COPD compared to placebo. Mucolytics did not improve mortality, number of lost workdays, scores on St. George's respiratory questionnaire, forced expiratory volume in 1 s, or forced vital capacity. The safety profile of mucolytics was comparable to that of placebo.

Conclusions

Mucolytics reduce exacerbations and hospitalizations in patients with stable COPD and have a safety profile comparable to that of placebo.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
粘液溶解剂对稳定期慢性阻塞性肺病患者的疗效和安全性:系统回顾与荟萃分析
背景据报道,粘液溶解剂对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)、慢性支气管炎或慢性阻塞性肺疾病加重患者具有疗效和安全性。我们对慢性阻塞性肺疾病稳定期患者使用粘液溶解剂的情况进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。方法在 PubMed、Scopus、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane Library 和 Igaku Cyuo Zasshi 数据库中检索了用于评估慢性阻塞性肺病稳定期患者使用的粘液溶解剂(包括氨溴索、溴己新、卡波司坦、厄多司坦、夫多司坦、l-甲基半胱氨酸和 N-乙酰半胱氨酸)的疗效和安全性的随机对照试验报告。结果23篇关于氨溴索、卡波司汀、厄多司汀、l-甲基半胱氨酸或N-乙酰半胱氨酸的报告被纳入综述。与安慰剂相比,氨甲环酸能明显降低慢性阻塞性肺病患者的病情加重率和住院率,缩短抗生素使用时间和病情加重时间,延长首次病情加重时间,并有减少两次或两次以上病情加重的趋势。粘多糖并未改善死亡率、损失工作日数、圣乔治呼吸问卷评分、1 秒内用力呼气量或用力肺活量。结论粘液溶解剂可减少慢性阻塞性肺疾病稳定期患者的病情加重和住院次数,其安全性与安慰剂相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Respiratory investigation
Respiratory investigation RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
114
审稿时长
64 days
期刊最新文献
Persistent COVID-19 improved with immunoglobulin replacement therapy in Good's syndrome Clinical characteristics and prognostic factors for MPO-ANCA positive interstitial lung disease: A comparative study of ANCA associated vasculitis (AAV)-ILD and pulmonary limited vasculitis Association of constipation with the survival of patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonias A protocol for a Japanese prospective cohort evaluating the features of patients with uncontrolled asthma achieving clinical remission: J-CIRCLE Viability and diagnostic potential of tissues obtained through cryobiopsy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1