The shelter recovery trajectory of typhoon Yolanda survivors: A critical synthesis review

IF 2.6 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Progress in Disaster Science Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1016/j.pdisas.2024.100378
Iftekhar Ahmed , Shelley Tuazon Guyton
{"title":"The shelter recovery trajectory of typhoon Yolanda survivors: A critical synthesis review","authors":"Iftekhar Ahmed ,&nbsp;Shelley Tuazon Guyton","doi":"10.1016/j.pdisas.2024.100378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Typhoon Haiyan (Yolanda) struck the Philippines in 2013 and devastated more than a million houses. To address the devastation, the government and humanitarian agencies undertook a variety of shelter recovery programs. However, there are reports that a large number of people were not supported for their shelter recovery, so questions arise regarding to what extent they managed to recover. The conceptual framework of this paper is framed by two related discourses – the vulnerability paradigm and a pro-poor policy agenda – relevant in the Global South context of the Philippines. The reason for focusing on shelter is because that is the sector which often experiences maximum impact in disasters, as was the case in Yolanda. Shelter recovery is a protracted process, and agencies usually engage over the short term, which is why this paper laid the foundation for future empirical investigations on the conditions on the ground now. There are many challenges in the recovery process, complicated by the government's restrictions on rebuilding near the coast, where nonetheless people built informal settlements to pursue their coastal livelihoods, and are hence vulnerable to future typhoons. Drawbacks of the shelter interventions are explored in relation to poverty, participation, self-recovery, land tenure, urban and rural differences, post-Yolanda cost escalation and links to Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH). It is recommended that people should be supported to build disaster-resilient and durable shelter, drawing on their social capital.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52341,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Disaster Science","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article 100378"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Disaster Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590061724000681","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Typhoon Haiyan (Yolanda) struck the Philippines in 2013 and devastated more than a million houses. To address the devastation, the government and humanitarian agencies undertook a variety of shelter recovery programs. However, there are reports that a large number of people were not supported for their shelter recovery, so questions arise regarding to what extent they managed to recover. The conceptual framework of this paper is framed by two related discourses – the vulnerability paradigm and a pro-poor policy agenda – relevant in the Global South context of the Philippines. The reason for focusing on shelter is because that is the sector which often experiences maximum impact in disasters, as was the case in Yolanda. Shelter recovery is a protracted process, and agencies usually engage over the short term, which is why this paper laid the foundation for future empirical investigations on the conditions on the ground now. There are many challenges in the recovery process, complicated by the government's restrictions on rebuilding near the coast, where nonetheless people built informal settlements to pursue their coastal livelihoods, and are hence vulnerable to future typhoons. Drawbacks of the shelter interventions are explored in relation to poverty, participation, self-recovery, land tenure, urban and rural differences, post-Yolanda cost escalation and links to Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH). It is recommended that people should be supported to build disaster-resilient and durable shelter, drawing on their social capital.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
台风 "约兰达 "幸存者的住房恢复轨迹:重要综述
2013 年,台风 "海燕"(约兰达)袭击了菲律宾,摧毁了 100 多万所房屋。为了应对这场灾难,政府和人道主义机构开展了各种住房恢复计划。然而,有报道称,许多人在住房恢复方面没有得到支持,因此,人们对他们在多大程度上成功恢复了住房产生了疑问。本文的概念框架由两个相关的论述构成,即与菲律宾全球南部背景相关的脆弱性范式和扶贫政策议程。之所以将重点放在住房方面,是因为住房往往是在灾害中受到最大影响的部门,约兰达岛的情况就是如此。住房恢复是一个旷日持久的过程,各机构通常在短期内参与其中,这也是本文为今后对实地情况进行实证调查奠定基础的原因所在。灾后重建过程中面临着许多挑战,政府对沿海地区重建的限制使问题变得更加复杂,许多人在沿海地区建造了非正规定居点,以谋求生计,因此很容易受到未来台风的影响。在贫困、参与、自我恢复、土地使用权、城乡差异、约兰达灾后成本上升以及与水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)的联系等方面,探讨了住房干预措施的缺点。建议利用人们的社会资本,支持他们建设抗灾耐用的住房。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Progress in Disaster Science
Progress in Disaster Science Social Sciences-Safety Research
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
51
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Progress in Disaster Science is a Gold Open Access journal focusing on integrating research and policy in disaster research, and publishes original research papers and invited viewpoint articles on disaster risk reduction; response; emergency management and recovery. A key part of the Journal's Publication output will see key experts invited to assess and comment on the current trends in disaster research, as well as highlight key papers.
期刊最新文献
Fire risk vulnerability and safety assessment of Farmgate area using fire risk index, Dhaka City and optimization of fire hydrant placement Small-grid urban flood prediction model using Twitter data and population GPS data - an example of the 2019 Nagano city flood Improving community understanding of cascading effects of critical infrastructure service failure: An experimental interactive learning process Climate-induced coastal occupational vulnerability and livelihood insecurity: Insights from coastal Bangladesh Morphological changes of river Bank Erosion and channel shifting assessment on Arial Khan River of Bangladesh using Landsat satellite time series images
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1