Probabilistic Design Analysis of Plate Anchors in Spatially Variable Clay

IF 5.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computers and Geotechnics Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106828
Pengpeng He , Gordon A. Fenton , D.V. Griffiths
{"title":"Probabilistic Design Analysis of Plate Anchors in Spatially Variable Clay","authors":"Pengpeng He ,&nbsp;Gordon A. Fenton ,&nbsp;D.V. Griffiths","doi":"10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Plate anchors play a vital role in various geotechnical structures, particularly in offshore settings where high pullout capacity is required. The current partial factor method accounts for uncertainties in loads and material properties separately using partial load and material factors, but it may not well address the effects of site investigation and soil spatial variability on the failure probability of design anchors. This study evaluated the reliability of offshore plate anchors designed using the partial factor method against the pullout limit state in clay. A Single-Random-Variable (SRV) method and a Random Finite Element Method (RFEM) were introduced and compared. Parametric studies were also performed to investigate the effects of load ratio, partial material factor, soil sampling location, and soil spatial correlation length on the estimated failure probability. The results highlight the importance of the soil sampling location and spatial variation in anchor design. The SRV method does not consider these factors, resulting in either over- or under-estimations of the failure probability compared to the RFEM. Practical implications from the findings were also discussed. Overall, this study aids in the probabilistic design of offshore plate anchors, the calibration of partial material factors, and in providing valuable guidance to their practical applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55217,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Geotechnics","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 106828"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Geotechnics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266352X24007675","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Plate anchors play a vital role in various geotechnical structures, particularly in offshore settings where high pullout capacity is required. The current partial factor method accounts for uncertainties in loads and material properties separately using partial load and material factors, but it may not well address the effects of site investigation and soil spatial variability on the failure probability of design anchors. This study evaluated the reliability of offshore plate anchors designed using the partial factor method against the pullout limit state in clay. A Single-Random-Variable (SRV) method and a Random Finite Element Method (RFEM) were introduced and compared. Parametric studies were also performed to investigate the effects of load ratio, partial material factor, soil sampling location, and soil spatial correlation length on the estimated failure probability. The results highlight the importance of the soil sampling location and spatial variation in anchor design. The SRV method does not consider these factors, resulting in either over- or under-estimations of the failure probability compared to the RFEM. Practical implications from the findings were also discussed. Overall, this study aids in the probabilistic design of offshore plate anchors, the calibration of partial material factors, and in providing valuable guidance to their practical applications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
空间可变粘土中板锚的概率设计分析
板锚在各种岩土结构中发挥着重要作用,尤其是在需要高抗拔能力的近海环境中。目前的部分系数法使用部分荷载和材料系数分别计算荷载和材料特性的不确定性,但可能无法很好地解决现场勘察和土壤空间变化对设计锚杆失效概率的影响。本研究针对粘土中的拉拔极限状态,评估了使用部分因子法设计的离岸板锚的可靠性。引入并比较了单随机变量法(SRV)和随机有限元法(RFEM)。还进行了参数研究,以探讨荷载比、部分材料系数、土壤取样位置和土壤空间相关长度对估计破坏概率的影响。结果凸显了土壤取样位置和空间变化在锚杆设计中的重要性。SRV 方法没有考虑这些因素,与 RFEM 相比,会导致失效概率估计过高或过低。还讨论了研究结果的实际意义。总之,这项研究有助于近海板锚的概率设计、部分材料因子的校准,并为其实际应用提供了宝贵的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computers and Geotechnics
Computers and Geotechnics 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
15.10%
发文量
438
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: The use of computers is firmly established in geotechnical engineering and continues to grow rapidly in both engineering practice and academe. The development of advanced numerical techniques and constitutive modeling, in conjunction with rapid developments in computer hardware, enables problems to be tackled that were unthinkable even a few years ago. Computers and Geotechnics provides an up-to-date reference for engineers and researchers engaged in computer aided analysis and research in geotechnical engineering. The journal is intended for an expeditious dissemination of advanced computer applications across a broad range of geotechnical topics. Contributions on advances in numerical algorithms, computer implementation of new constitutive models and probabilistic methods are especially encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Stability of conical foundations on anisotropic clay: A comprehensive three-dimensional study on V-H-M failure envelopes Effect of the connection mode on the dynamic characteristics of the pile-wheel composite foundation for offshore wind turbines Particle shape distribution effects on the critical strength of granular materials DEM Validation for impact Wave propagation in dry sand: A comparison with experimental results Evaluation of the shear stiffness and load redistribution of framed structures affected by tunnelling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1