Racial and ethnic differences in patient psychological safety: A qualitative patient narrative study

IF 1.8 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SSM. Qualitative research in health Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100491
Cheryl Rathert , Derick R. Simmons , Jessica N. Mittler , Kimberly Enard , Joanna Veazey Brooks
{"title":"Racial and ethnic differences in patient psychological safety: A qualitative patient narrative study","authors":"Cheryl Rathert ,&nbsp;Derick R. Simmons ,&nbsp;Jessica N. Mittler ,&nbsp;Kimberly Enard ,&nbsp;Joanna Veazey Brooks","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The existence of racial and ethnic disparities in health outcomes is well-established. In addition to discrimination and social determinants, disparities can result from lower-quality relationships that historically marginalized groups may experience with health care providers and systems. The extent to which patients can connect with and be known by care providers is thought to play a key role in their subsequent diagnoses, treatments, care plans, and health behaviors. Recent research has found that many patients express the need for patient psychological safety (PPS) in order to feel connected. Thus, we were interested in exploring whether there exist racial/ethnic differences in experiences of PPS, as a lack of safety could reduce patients’ opportunities to connect with providers. This study used a patient narrative approach, in which patients respond to open-ended questions in their own words, to examine what patients say related to PPS and the extent to which their characterizations may vary by race and/or ethnicity. Patient responses (n = 1766) were coded to fit into one of three conceptual PPS dimensions: <em>belonging, learning, and participating.</em> Analysis found that nearly all patients described some level of PPS as indicating to them they had a good connection with providers, with greater proportions of Black and Hispanic/Latino patients expressing <em>belonging safety</em>, that is, the need to feel welcomed and respected as a human being. In contrast, White patients were more likely to express <em>participation safety</em>, or the need to have influence on their care. This study contributes a new, nuanced understanding of patient experiences of connecting with care providers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74862,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100491"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321524001008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The existence of racial and ethnic disparities in health outcomes is well-established. In addition to discrimination and social determinants, disparities can result from lower-quality relationships that historically marginalized groups may experience with health care providers and systems. The extent to which patients can connect with and be known by care providers is thought to play a key role in their subsequent diagnoses, treatments, care plans, and health behaviors. Recent research has found that many patients express the need for patient psychological safety (PPS) in order to feel connected. Thus, we were interested in exploring whether there exist racial/ethnic differences in experiences of PPS, as a lack of safety could reduce patients’ opportunities to connect with providers. This study used a patient narrative approach, in which patients respond to open-ended questions in their own words, to examine what patients say related to PPS and the extent to which their characterizations may vary by race and/or ethnicity. Patient responses (n = 1766) were coded to fit into one of three conceptual PPS dimensions: belonging, learning, and participating. Analysis found that nearly all patients described some level of PPS as indicating to them they had a good connection with providers, with greater proportions of Black and Hispanic/Latino patients expressing belonging safety, that is, the need to feel welcomed and respected as a human being. In contrast, White patients were more likely to express participation safety, or the need to have influence on their care. This study contributes a new, nuanced understanding of patient experiences of connecting with care providers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者心理安全的种族和民族差异:患者叙事定性研究
在健康结果方面存在种族和民族差异是公认的事实。除了歧视和社会决定因素之外,历史上被边缘化的群体与医疗服务提供者和医疗系统之间的关系质量较低也会造成差异。人们认为,患者与医疗服务提供者的联系程度以及医疗服务提供者对患者的了解程度,对患者随后的诊断、治疗、护理计划和健康行为起着关键作用。最近的研究发现,许多患者表示需要患者心理安全(PPS),以获得联系感。因此,我们有兴趣探索在患者心理安全体验方面是否存在种族/民族差异,因为缺乏安全感会减少患者与医疗服务提供者建立联系的机会。本研究采用了患者叙述的方法,即患者用自己的话回答开放式问题,来研究患者对 PPS 的看法,以及不同种族和/或族裔对其描述的不同程度。患者的回答(n = 1766)被编码为符合 PPS 三个概念维度之一:归属、学习和参与。分析发现,几乎所有患者都描述了某种程度的 PPS,这表明他们与医疗服务提供者建立了良好的联系,其中黑人和西班牙裔/拉丁美洲裔患者表达归属安全感的比例更高,也就是说,他们需要感受到作为一个人受到欢迎和尊重。相比之下,白人患者更倾向于表达参与安全感,即需要对他们的护理产生影响。这项研究有助于人们对病人与医疗服务提供者的联系体验有一个新的、细致入微的了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
163 days
期刊最新文献
A qualitative study of sources of knowledge in individuals with hoarding disorder: The impact of media depictions and social comparisons Perspectives of Palestinian physicians on the impact of the Gaza War in the West Bank “I am forced to just give it to her because she is the one who wants it”: A qualitative study of providers’ perspectives on contraceptive counseling in Tanzania Prenatal care in urban China: Qualitative study on challenges and coping mechanisms Ableism in mental healthcare settings: A qualitative study among U.S. adults with disabilities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1