Railway capacity utilization and service quality of freight trains with increased top speed in mixed traffic

Mohammad Al-Mousa, Hans Sipilä, Oskar Fröidh
{"title":"Railway capacity utilization and service quality of freight trains with increased top speed in mixed traffic","authors":"Mohammad Al-Mousa,&nbsp;Hans Sipilä,&nbsp;Oskar Fröidh","doi":"10.1016/j.trip.2024.101242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper attempts to provide a better understanding of the service quality risks that are associated with freight train operations in mixed traffic. Adequate operational quality requires a certain level of robustness to delays and disruptions, but on segments with confined capacity, robustness becomes more fragile with increased traffic demand and speed heterogeneity. This trade-off between capacity utilization and service robustness predominantly manifests itself by compromising the reliability of rail freight services for two main reasons. Firstly, passenger trains are often prioritized in dispatching over freight trains. Secondly, many freight trains operate over longer distances and they accumulate more delays. Decreasing speed heterogeneity in mixed traffic may become pivotal in the interplay between robustness and capacity utilization. In this paper, we investigate possible improvements in capacity utilization and in railway service quality when introducing faster freight trains in mixed-traffic operations. The analysis is carried out on the Swedish Southern Main Line, which forms part of the Scandinavian–Mediterranean freight corridor. Microscopic simulation is used to explore performance indicators, such as simulated running times with respect to scheduled running times, capacity utilization, and punctuality, by implementing and comparing scenarios with different maximum speeds for freight trains. The results suggest that increasing the top speed of freight trains might seem as a promising approach for reduced utilization of capacity in the planning stage, but the stochasticity of operations in mixed traffic may become more challenging for delay recovery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36621,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198224002288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper attempts to provide a better understanding of the service quality risks that are associated with freight train operations in mixed traffic. Adequate operational quality requires a certain level of robustness to delays and disruptions, but on segments with confined capacity, robustness becomes more fragile with increased traffic demand and speed heterogeneity. This trade-off between capacity utilization and service robustness predominantly manifests itself by compromising the reliability of rail freight services for two main reasons. Firstly, passenger trains are often prioritized in dispatching over freight trains. Secondly, many freight trains operate over longer distances and they accumulate more delays. Decreasing speed heterogeneity in mixed traffic may become pivotal in the interplay between robustness and capacity utilization. In this paper, we investigate possible improvements in capacity utilization and in railway service quality when introducing faster freight trains in mixed-traffic operations. The analysis is carried out on the Swedish Southern Main Line, which forms part of the Scandinavian–Mediterranean freight corridor. Microscopic simulation is used to explore performance indicators, such as simulated running times with respect to scheduled running times, capacity utilization, and punctuality, by implementing and comparing scenarios with different maximum speeds for freight trains. The results suggest that increasing the top speed of freight trains might seem as a promising approach for reduced utilization of capacity in the planning stage, but the stochasticity of operations in mixed traffic may become more challenging for delay recovery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在混合交通中提高最高速度的货运列车的铁路运力利用率和服务质量
本文试图让人们更好地了解混合交通中货运列车运行的服务质量风险。适当的运营质量要求对延误和中断具有一定程度的稳健性,但在运力有限的区段,随着交通需求和速度异质性的增加,稳健性变得更加脆弱。运力利用率和服务稳健性之间的这种权衡主要表现为铁路货运服务的可靠性受到影响,主要原因有两个。首先,在调度时,客运列车往往优先于货运列车。其次,许多货运列车运行距离较长,延误时间较长。降低混合交通中的速度异质性可能会成为稳健性与运力利用率之间相互作用的关键。在本文中,我们研究了在混合交通运营中引入速度更快的货运列车时,运力利用率和铁路服务质量可能得到的改善。分析在瑞典南方干线上进行,该干线是斯堪的纳维亚-地中海货运走廊的一部分。通过实施和比较货运列车不同最高速度的方案,使用微观模拟来探索性能指标,如相对于计划运行时间的模拟运行时间、运力利用率和准点率。结果表明,在规划阶段,提高货运列车的最高速度似乎是降低运力利用率的一种可行方法,但混合交通中运营的随机性可能会给延误恢复带来更大的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Electric mobility investment in the power and transport sector coupling context: Lessons from Argentina, the Philippines, Poland and Romania Comparative Analysis of barriers to Battery electric vehicle adoption between BEV and ICE Users: A case study of Thailand Disparities in ridehailing travel times for accessing non-work destinations Optimal bus reassignment considering in-vehicle overcrowding Drones for automated parcel delivery: Use case identification and derivation of technical requirements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1