{"title":"Energetic exhaustiveness for the direct characterization of energy forms of hyperelastic isotropic materials","authors":"Federico Oyedeji Falope , Luca Lanzoni , Angelo Marcello Tarantino","doi":"10.1016/j.jmps.2024.105885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>It is common practice to characterize the constitutive law of a material indirectly. This takes place by fitting a specific stress component, which is given as a combination of response functions or derivatives of the energy function of the material. Yet, it is possible to characterize each energy derivative of the material directly. Not only that but, through a few well-designed tests, getting a set of well-distributed data that defines the evolution of the energy derivatives in the invariant space is attainable, but not for all tests. Here, each test is portrayed as an equilibrium path on the surfaces (or volumes) of the derivative of the energy function. In the framework of the homothetic tests of hyperelastic isotropic materials, we propose the definition of <em>energetic exhaustiveness</em>. This definition relates to the capability of a test, via its analytic formulation according to a proper set of deformation invariants, to directly provide a closed-form solution for the derivatives of the energy function. In reaching this definition and retracing the Baker–Ericksen and the empirical inequalities, an alternative form of Baker–Ericksen inequalities is presented. We demonstrate that the unequal-biaxial test alone is energetically exhaustive and that it can provide (the same and more) information on the energy compared to the uniaxial, equi-biaxial, and pure shear tests. Unequal-biaxial experiments on three rubbers are presented. The outcomes of experiments contradict the empirical inequalities and seem to suggest new hierarchical empirical inequalities. Compact and nearly exact solutions are provided to perform and design tests at a constant magnitude of distortion, thus reaching a direct and comprehensive representation of the energy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17331,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Mechanics and Physics of Solids","volume":"193 ","pages":"Article 105885"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Mechanics and Physics of Solids","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002250962400351X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
It is common practice to characterize the constitutive law of a material indirectly. This takes place by fitting a specific stress component, which is given as a combination of response functions or derivatives of the energy function of the material. Yet, it is possible to characterize each energy derivative of the material directly. Not only that but, through a few well-designed tests, getting a set of well-distributed data that defines the evolution of the energy derivatives in the invariant space is attainable, but not for all tests. Here, each test is portrayed as an equilibrium path on the surfaces (or volumes) of the derivative of the energy function. In the framework of the homothetic tests of hyperelastic isotropic materials, we propose the definition of energetic exhaustiveness. This definition relates to the capability of a test, via its analytic formulation according to a proper set of deformation invariants, to directly provide a closed-form solution for the derivatives of the energy function. In reaching this definition and retracing the Baker–Ericksen and the empirical inequalities, an alternative form of Baker–Ericksen inequalities is presented. We demonstrate that the unequal-biaxial test alone is energetically exhaustive and that it can provide (the same and more) information on the energy compared to the uniaxial, equi-biaxial, and pure shear tests. Unequal-biaxial experiments on three rubbers are presented. The outcomes of experiments contradict the empirical inequalities and seem to suggest new hierarchical empirical inequalities. Compact and nearly exact solutions are provided to perform and design tests at a constant magnitude of distortion, thus reaching a direct and comprehensive representation of the energy.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Journal of The Mechanics and Physics of Solids is to publish research of the highest quality and of lasting significance on the mechanics of solids. The scope is broad, from fundamental concepts in mechanics to the analysis of novel phenomena and applications. Solids are interpreted broadly to include both hard and soft materials as well as natural and synthetic structures. The approach can be theoretical, experimental or computational.This research activity sits within engineering science and the allied areas of applied mathematics, materials science, bio-mechanics, applied physics, and geophysics.
The Journal was founded in 1952 by Rodney Hill, who was its Editor-in-Chief until 1968. The topics of interest to the Journal evolve with developments in the subject but its basic ethos remains the same: to publish research of the highest quality relating to the mechanics of solids. Thus, emphasis is placed on the development of fundamental concepts of mechanics and novel applications of these concepts based on theoretical, experimental or computational approaches, drawing upon the various branches of engineering science and the allied areas within applied mathematics, materials science, structural engineering, applied physics, and geophysics.
The main purpose of the Journal is to foster scientific understanding of the processes of deformation and mechanical failure of all solid materials, both technological and natural, and the connections between these processes and their underlying physical mechanisms. In this sense, the content of the Journal should reflect the current state of the discipline in analysis, experimental observation, and numerical simulation. In the interest of achieving this goal, authors are encouraged to consider the significance of their contributions for the field of mechanics and the implications of their results, in addition to describing the details of their work.