Comparative assessment of the scientific structure of biomass-based hydrogen from a cross-domain perspective

Q2 Energy Energy Informatics Pub Date : 2024-10-14 DOI:10.1186/s42162-024-00399-z
Kunihiko Okuda, Hajime Sasaki
{"title":"Comparative assessment of the scientific structure of biomass-based hydrogen from a cross-domain perspective","authors":"Kunihiko Okuda,&nbsp;Hajime Sasaki","doi":"10.1186/s42162-024-00399-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Biomass-based hydrogen production is an innovative approach for realizing carbon-neutral energy solutions. Despite their promise, both structures differ in terms of the biomass energy domain, which is at the entry point of the technology, and the hydrogen energy domain, which is at the exit point of the technology. In this study, we conducted structural and predictive analyses via cross-domain bibliometric analysis to clarify the differences in the structures and perspectives of researchers across domains and to suggest ways to strengthen collaboration to promote innovation. Our study revealed that the hydrogen energy domain has a balanced impact on realizing a hydrogen society using biomass-based hydrogen production technology, while the biomass energy domain has a strong interest in the process of processing biomass. The results reveal that different communities have different ideas about research, resulting in a divide in the areas to be achieved. This comparative analysis reveals the importance of synergistic progress through interdisciplinary efforts. By filling these gaps, our findings can lead to the development of a roadmap for future research and policy development in renewable energy and highlight the importance of a unified approach to sustainable hydrogen production. The contribution of this study is to provide evidence for the importance of cross-disciplinary cooperation for R&amp;D directors and policy makers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":538,"journal":{"name":"Energy Informatics","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s42162-024-00399-z.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s42162-024-00399-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Energy","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biomass-based hydrogen production is an innovative approach for realizing carbon-neutral energy solutions. Despite their promise, both structures differ in terms of the biomass energy domain, which is at the entry point of the technology, and the hydrogen energy domain, which is at the exit point of the technology. In this study, we conducted structural and predictive analyses via cross-domain bibliometric analysis to clarify the differences in the structures and perspectives of researchers across domains and to suggest ways to strengthen collaboration to promote innovation. Our study revealed that the hydrogen energy domain has a balanced impact on realizing a hydrogen society using biomass-based hydrogen production technology, while the biomass energy domain has a strong interest in the process of processing biomass. The results reveal that different communities have different ideas about research, resulting in a divide in the areas to be achieved. This comparative analysis reveals the importance of synergistic progress through interdisciplinary efforts. By filling these gaps, our findings can lead to the development of a roadmap for future research and policy development in renewable energy and highlight the importance of a unified approach to sustainable hydrogen production. The contribution of this study is to provide evidence for the importance of cross-disciplinary cooperation for R&D directors and policy makers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从跨领域角度比较评估生物质制氢的科学结构
生物质制氢是实现碳中和能源解决方案的一种创新方法。尽管前景广阔,但这两种结构在生物质能源领域和氢能源领域存在差异,前者处于技术的入口点,而后者则处于技术的出口点。在本研究中,我们通过跨领域文献计量分析进行了结构性和预测性分析,以厘清各领域研究人员在结构和视角上的差异,并提出加强合作以促进创新的方法。我们的研究发现,氢能领域对利用基于生物质的制氢技术实现氢社会的影响较为均衡,而生物质能领域则对生物质的加工过程兴趣浓厚。研究结果表明,不同的群体对研究有着不同的想法,从而导致要实现的领域出现分歧。这项比较分析揭示了通过跨学科努力取得协同进展的重要性。通过填补这些空白,我们的研究结果可以为可再生能源领域未来的研究和政策制定提供一个路线图,并凸显出采用统一方法进行可持续制氢的重要性。本研究的贡献在于为研发主管和政策制定者提供了跨学科合作重要性的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Informatics
Energy Informatics Computer Science-Computer Networks and Communications
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
Intelligent information systems for power grid fault analysis by computer communication technology Application of simulated annealing algorithm in multi-objective cooperative scheduling of load and storage of source network for load side of new power system Hierarchical quantitative prediction of photovoltaic power generation depreciation expense based on matrix task prioritization considering uncertainty risk Transmission line trip faults under extreme snow and ice conditions: a case study A photovoltaic power ultra short-term prediction method integrating Hungarian clustering and PSO algorithm
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1