Feasibility study of data-driven wall interference correction framework for subsonic wind tunnel

IF 4.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1016/j.jweia.2024.105923
Myungsik Tai , Hyeonwoo Hwang , Shinkyu Jeong , Jongseo Bak , Donghun Park
{"title":"Feasibility study of data-driven wall interference correction framework for subsonic wind tunnel","authors":"Myungsik Tai ,&nbsp;Hyeonwoo Hwang ,&nbsp;Shinkyu Jeong ,&nbsp;Jongseo Bak ,&nbsp;Donghun Park","doi":"10.1016/j.jweia.2024.105923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although the classical method is widely used for wall interference correction in wind tunnel testing, its reliability and accuracy for complex and unconventional geometries are rather limited. Studies on the evaluation of wall interference and the improvement of correction methods are desirable to enhance the reliability and generality for various geometric configurations. This study proposes a wall interference correction framework based on a deep neural network (DNN) ensemble using data obtained from the numerical panel method. The panel method is validated by comparing the results with those of Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes simulations. An automated process was established to generate a large amount of training data, and 600,000 datasets were generated based on the geometric parameters of the wind tunnel, test model, and angles of attack. The input variables of the DNN were determined through sensitivity analysis of the data. To alleviate the randomness of the initial weights and data distribution in the generation process of the DNN model, 20 DNNs with the same multi-layer perceptron structure were trained, and a DNN ensemble model was constructed using five ensemble members with high predictability. The accuracy of the DNN-ensemble based correction models were evaluated by comparing the correction results for the testing data.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54752,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics","volume":"254 ","pages":"Article 105923"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167610524002861","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although the classical method is widely used for wall interference correction in wind tunnel testing, its reliability and accuracy for complex and unconventional geometries are rather limited. Studies on the evaluation of wall interference and the improvement of correction methods are desirable to enhance the reliability and generality for various geometric configurations. This study proposes a wall interference correction framework based on a deep neural network (DNN) ensemble using data obtained from the numerical panel method. The panel method is validated by comparing the results with those of Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes simulations. An automated process was established to generate a large amount of training data, and 600,000 datasets were generated based on the geometric parameters of the wind tunnel, test model, and angles of attack. The input variables of the DNN were determined through sensitivity analysis of the data. To alleviate the randomness of the initial weights and data distribution in the generation process of the DNN model, 20 DNNs with the same multi-layer perceptron structure were trained, and a DNN ensemble model was constructed using five ensemble members with high predictability. The accuracy of the DNN-ensemble based correction models were evaluated by comparing the correction results for the testing data.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亚音速风洞数据驱动壁面干扰修正框架可行性研究
虽然经典方法被广泛用于风洞试验中的壁面干扰校正,但其对于复杂和非常规几何结构的可靠性和准确性相当有限。为了提高各种几何构造的可靠性和通用性,有必要对壁面干扰的评估和修正方法的改进进行研究。本研究利用数值面板法获得的数据,提出了基于深度神经网络(DNN)集合的壁面干涉修正框架。通过将结果与雷诺平均纳维-斯托克斯模拟结果进行比较,验证了面板法。为生成大量训练数据建立了一个自动化流程,并根据风洞的几何参数、测试模型和攻角生成了 600,000 个数据集。DNN 的输入变量是通过对数据的敏感性分析确定的。为减轻 DNN 模型生成过程中初始权重和数据分布的随机性,训练了 20 个具有相同多层感知器结构的 DNN,并使用五个具有高预测性的集合成员构建了 DNN 集合模型。通过比较测试数据的修正结果,评估了基于 DNN 集合的修正模型的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
22.90%
发文量
306
审稿时长
4.4 months
期刊介绍: The objective of the journal is to provide a means for the publication and interchange of information, on an international basis, on all those aspects of wind engineering that are included in the activities of the International Association for Wind Engineering http://www.iawe.org/. These are: social and economic impact of wind effects; wind characteristics and structure, local wind environments, wind loads and structural response, diffusion, pollutant dispersion and matter transport, wind effects on building heat loss and ventilation, wind effects on transport systems, aerodynamic aspects of wind energy generation, and codification of wind effects. Papers on these subjects describing full-scale measurements, wind-tunnel simulation studies, computational or theoretical methods are published, as well as papers dealing with the development of techniques and apparatus for wind engineering experiments.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating different categories of turbulence models for calculating air pollutant dispersion in street canyons with generic and real urban layouts Numerical simulation and experimental study of the effects of retaining block structures on wavefront steepening in rail tunnels A wake prediction framework based on the MOST Gaussian wake model and a deep learning approach Advanced statistical analysis of vortex-induced vibrations in suspension bridge hangers with and without Stockbridge dampers Converting dependence of extreme wind pressure coefficients across different epochs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1