Protocol: Assessing the impact of interest-holder engagement on guideline development: A systematic review

IF 4 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Campbell Systematic Reviews Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1002/cl2.1444
Lyubov Lytvyn, Jennifer Petkovic, Joanne Khabsa, Olivia Magwood, Pauline Campbell, Ian D. Graham, Kevin Pottie, Julia Bidonde, Heather Limburg, Danielle Pollock, Elie A. Akl, Thomas W. Concannon, Peter Tugwell
{"title":"Protocol: Assessing the impact of interest-holder engagement on guideline development: A systematic review","authors":"Lyubov Lytvyn,&nbsp;Jennifer Petkovic,&nbsp;Joanne Khabsa,&nbsp;Olivia Magwood,&nbsp;Pauline Campbell,&nbsp;Ian D. Graham,&nbsp;Kevin Pottie,&nbsp;Julia Bidonde,&nbsp;Heather Limburg,&nbsp;Danielle Pollock,&nbsp;Elie A. Akl,&nbsp;Thomas W. Concannon,&nbsp;Peter Tugwell","doi":"10.1002/cl2.1444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The objectives are as follows. The objective of this review is to identify and synthesize empirical research on the impacts of interest-holder engagement on the guideline development process and content. Our research questions are as follows: (1) What are the empirical examples of impact on the process in health guideline development across any of the 18 steps of the GIN-McMaster checklist? (2) What are the empirical examples of impact on the content in health guideline development across any of the 18 steps of the GIN-McMaster checklist?</p>","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"20 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cl2.1444","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cl2.1444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The objectives are as follows. The objective of this review is to identify and synthesize empirical research on the impacts of interest-holder engagement on the guideline development process and content. Our research questions are as follows: (1) What are the empirical examples of impact on the process in health guideline development across any of the 18 steps of the GIN-McMaster checklist? (2) What are the empirical examples of impact on the content in health guideline development across any of the 18 steps of the GIN-McMaster checklist?

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
协议:评估利益相关者参与对指南制定的影响:系统回顾
这是坎贝尔系统综述的协议。目标如下。本综述的目的是确定并综合有关利益相关者参与对指南制定过程和内容的影响的实证研究。我们的研究问题如下(1) 在 GIN-McMaster 核对表的 18 个步骤中,有哪些实证案例说明了对健康指南制定过程的影响?(2)在 GIN-McMaster 核对表的 18 个步骤中,有哪些实证案例说明了对健康指南制定内容的影响?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Campbell Systematic Reviews
Campbell Systematic Reviews Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
21.90%
发文量
80
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Protocol: The impact of integrated thematic instruction model on primary and secondary school students compared to standard teaching: A protocol of systematic review. Assessment of publication time in Campbell Systematic Reviews: A cross-sectional survey Correction to “Campbell standards: Modernizing Campbell's Methodologic Expectations for Campbell Collaboration Intervention Reviews (MECCIR)” PROTOCOL: Financial coaching for enhancing household finances and health/well-being: A systematic review and meta-analysis Campbell title registrations to date – August 2024, and discontinued protocols
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1