Foreground biases in strong gravitational lensing

IF 5.3 2区 物理与天体物理 Q1 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics Pub Date : 2024-10-14 DOI:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/10/055
Daniel Johnson, Pierre Fleury, Julien Larena and Lucia Marchetti
{"title":"Foreground biases in strong gravitational lensing","authors":"Daniel Johnson, Pierre Fleury, Julien Larena and Lucia Marchetti","doi":"10.1088/1475-7516/2024/10/055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Strong gravitational lensing is a competitive tool to probe the dark matter and energy content of the Universe. However, significant uncertainties can arise from the choice of lens model, and in particular the parameterisation of the line of sight. In this work, we consider the consequences of ignoring the contribution of foreground perturbers in lens modelling. We derive the explicit form of the degeneracy between the foreground shear and the ellipticity of a power law lens, which renders the former quantity effectively unmeasurable from strong lensing observables, and biases measurements of the latter by a few percent. Nonetheless, we demonstrate that this degeneracy does not affect measurements of the Einstein radius. Foreground tidal effects are also not expected to bias the slope of the potential, and any biases in this slope should not affect the recovery of the Hubble constant. The foreground convergence term adds an additional uncertainty to the measurement of H0, and we show that this uncertainty will be on the order of 1% for lensing systems located along random lines of sight. There is evidence to indicate that the probability of strong lensing is higher towards overdense lines of sight, and this could result in a small systematic bias towards overestimations of H0.","PeriodicalId":15445,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2024/10/055","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Strong gravitational lensing is a competitive tool to probe the dark matter and energy content of the Universe. However, significant uncertainties can arise from the choice of lens model, and in particular the parameterisation of the line of sight. In this work, we consider the consequences of ignoring the contribution of foreground perturbers in lens modelling. We derive the explicit form of the degeneracy between the foreground shear and the ellipticity of a power law lens, which renders the former quantity effectively unmeasurable from strong lensing observables, and biases measurements of the latter by a few percent. Nonetheless, we demonstrate that this degeneracy does not affect measurements of the Einstein radius. Foreground tidal effects are also not expected to bias the slope of the potential, and any biases in this slope should not affect the recovery of the Hubble constant. The foreground convergence term adds an additional uncertainty to the measurement of H0, and we show that this uncertainty will be on the order of 1% for lensing systems located along random lines of sight. There is evidence to indicate that the probability of strong lensing is higher towards overdense lines of sight, and this could result in a small systematic bias towards overestimations of H0.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
强引力透镜的前景偏差
强引力透镜是探测宇宙暗物质和暗能量含量的有力工具。然而,透镜模型的选择,特别是视线的参数化,可能会产生很大的不确定性。在这项工作中,我们考虑了在透镜建模中忽略前景扰动器贡献的后果。我们推导出了幂律透镜的前景剪切和椭圆度之间的退行性的明确形式,这使得前者实际上无法从强透镜观测数据中测量,而后者的测量则会产生百分之几的偏差。尽管如此,我们还是证明了这种退化并不影响对爱因斯坦半径的测量。预计前景潮汐效应也不会使势垒斜率产生偏差,而且该斜率的任何偏差都不会影响哈勃常数的恢复。前景会聚项为 H0 的测量增加了额外的不确定性,我们的研究表明,对于位于随机视线上的透镜系统来说,这种不确定性大约为 1%。有证据表明,在视线过密的地方发生强透镜的概率较高,这可能会导致H0被高估的小系统偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 地学天文-天文与天体物理
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
23.40%
发文量
632
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics (JCAP) encompasses theoretical, observational and experimental areas as well as computation and simulation. The journal covers the latest developments in the theory of all fundamental interactions and their cosmological implications (e.g. M-theory and cosmology, brane cosmology). JCAP''s coverage also includes topics such as formation, dynamics and clustering of galaxies, pre-galactic star formation, x-ray astronomy, radio astronomy, gravitational lensing, active galactic nuclei, intergalactic and interstellar matter.
期刊最新文献
Teleparallel geometry with spherical symmetry: the diagonal and proper frames On marginals and profiled posteriors for cosmological parameter estimation Efficient hybrid technique for generating sub-grid haloes in reionization simulations Constructing viable interacting dark matter and dark energy models: a dynamical systems approach A speed limit on tachyon fields from cosmological and fine-structure data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1