Su Young Lee, René Daher, Jin‐Hyung Jung, Kyungdo Han, Irena Sailer, Jae‐Hyun Lee
{"title":"Risk of Late Implant Loss and Peri‐Implantitis Based on Dental Implant Surfaces and Abutment Types: A Nationwide Cohort Study in the Elderly","authors":"Su Young Lee, René Daher, Jin‐Hyung Jung, Kyungdo Han, Irena Sailer, Jae‐Hyun Lee","doi":"10.1111/jcpe.14079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AimThis nationwide population‐based cohort study aimed to assess the incidence of implant complication treatments, including implant removal procedures and peri‐implantitis treatments, in relation to implant surfaces and abutment types.MethodsData from the National Health Insurance Service, covering approximately 50 million individuals, were used. Implants and abutments were categorized by codes, including surfaces such as resorbable blasting media, sandblasted large grit and acid‐etched (SA) and hydroxyapatite coating, along with abutment structures (one‐piece straight, two‐piece straight, angled). The incidence of implant complication treatments was analysed using Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards regression (<jats:italic>α</jats:italic> = 0.05).ResultsThe study included 2,354,706 implants. The SA group had the lowest hazard ratio for implant removal procedures (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.0001). No significant differences were found in the risk of peri‐implantitis treatments between implant surfaces (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.0587). The risk of implant complication treatments did not differ significantly by the abutment type (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.9542). The incidence rate of implant complication treatments was < 3.9 per 1000 implant‐years across all groups.ConclusionsThe SA group showed a slightly lower risk of late implant loss, whereas no significant association was found for the abutment type groups. All implant and abutment type groups showed an incidence rate of < 3.9 per 1000 implant‐years for complication treatments.","PeriodicalId":15380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Periodontology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Periodontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.14079","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
AimThis nationwide population‐based cohort study aimed to assess the incidence of implant complication treatments, including implant removal procedures and peri‐implantitis treatments, in relation to implant surfaces and abutment types.MethodsData from the National Health Insurance Service, covering approximately 50 million individuals, were used. Implants and abutments were categorized by codes, including surfaces such as resorbable blasting media, sandblasted large grit and acid‐etched (SA) and hydroxyapatite coating, along with abutment structures (one‐piece straight, two‐piece straight, angled). The incidence of implant complication treatments was analysed using Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards regression (α = 0.05).ResultsThe study included 2,354,706 implants. The SA group had the lowest hazard ratio for implant removal procedures (p < 0.0001). No significant differences were found in the risk of peri‐implantitis treatments between implant surfaces (p = 0.0587). The risk of implant complication treatments did not differ significantly by the abutment type (p = 0.9542). The incidence rate of implant complication treatments was < 3.9 per 1000 implant‐years across all groups.ConclusionsThe SA group showed a slightly lower risk of late implant loss, whereas no significant association was found for the abutment type groups. All implant and abutment type groups showed an incidence rate of < 3.9 per 1000 implant‐years for complication treatments.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Periodontology was founded by the British, Dutch, French, German, Scandinavian, and Swiss Societies of Periodontology.
The aim of the Journal of Clinical Periodontology is to provide the platform for exchange of scientific and clinical progress in the field of Periodontology and allied disciplines, and to do so at the highest possible level. The Journal also aims to facilitate the application of new scientific knowledge to the daily practice of the concerned disciplines and addresses both practicing clinicians and academics. The Journal is the official publication of the European Federation of Periodontology but wishes to retain its international scope.
The Journal publishes original contributions of high scientific merit in the fields of periodontology and implant dentistry. Its scope encompasses the physiology and pathology of the periodontium, the tissue integration of dental implants, the biology and the modulation of periodontal and alveolar bone healing and regeneration, diagnosis, epidemiology, prevention and therapy of periodontal disease, the clinical aspects of tooth replacement with dental implants, and the comprehensive rehabilitation of the periodontal patient. Review articles by experts on new developments in basic and applied periodontal science and associated dental disciplines, advances in periodontal or implant techniques and procedures, and case reports which illustrate important new information are also welcome.