{"title":"Impacts of cultivated land protection practices on farmers' welfare: A dual quality and ecology perspective","authors":"Kai Zou , Jiayu Tian , Yan Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Given the vital role of the quantity, quality, and ecology of cultivated lands in ensuring food security, climate resilience, and biodiversity conservation, cultivated land protection practices (CLPPs) have been applied to many regions across the world. However, the expansion of such practices faces challenges due to unknown welfare effects on the local population. This study uses data in a panel multinomial endogenous switching model at the plot level to estimate the heterogeneous impacts of different combinations of CLPPs on farmers' comprehensive welfare. Besides revealing factors influencing the adoption of CLPPs, results show that the welfare of farmers who adopted practices conducive to cultivated land quality improvement (CQI) and cultivated land ecological protection (CEP) significantly increased, by 9.59 % and 11.47 %, respectively. The welfare of joint adopters engaged in both practices (CQI & CEP) increased by 23.89 %, which was significantly higher than the other two individual practices. After a specific cost-benefit analysis, the results revealed that CQI adopters and joint adopters attained positive economic profits, while CEP adopters incurred economic losses. A combination of these two practices emerged as the optimal choice for maximizing the welfare of farmers compared with adopting each of the CQI and CEP practices in isolation. Furthermore, these welfare effects vary with such factors as <em>technology training</em>, <em>assets</em>, <em>cooperative members</em>, and <em>plot size</em>. The work is expected to contribute to evidence-based policymaking about CLPPs promotion and sustainable use of cultivated lands.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 107690"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925524002774","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Given the vital role of the quantity, quality, and ecology of cultivated lands in ensuring food security, climate resilience, and biodiversity conservation, cultivated land protection practices (CLPPs) have been applied to many regions across the world. However, the expansion of such practices faces challenges due to unknown welfare effects on the local population. This study uses data in a panel multinomial endogenous switching model at the plot level to estimate the heterogeneous impacts of different combinations of CLPPs on farmers' comprehensive welfare. Besides revealing factors influencing the adoption of CLPPs, results show that the welfare of farmers who adopted practices conducive to cultivated land quality improvement (CQI) and cultivated land ecological protection (CEP) significantly increased, by 9.59 % and 11.47 %, respectively. The welfare of joint adopters engaged in both practices (CQI & CEP) increased by 23.89 %, which was significantly higher than the other two individual practices. After a specific cost-benefit analysis, the results revealed that CQI adopters and joint adopters attained positive economic profits, while CEP adopters incurred economic losses. A combination of these two practices emerged as the optimal choice for maximizing the welfare of farmers compared with adopting each of the CQI and CEP practices in isolation. Furthermore, these welfare effects vary with such factors as technology training, assets, cooperative members, and plot size. The work is expected to contribute to evidence-based policymaking about CLPPs promotion and sustainable use of cultivated lands.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.