Sustainability versus exclusivity in the sharing economy: Should leftover luxury fashion products be destroyed?

Yingjia Wang , Tsan-Ming Choi , Suyuan Luo
{"title":"Sustainability versus exclusivity in the sharing economy: Should leftover luxury fashion products be destroyed?","authors":"Yingjia Wang ,&nbsp;Tsan-Ming Choi ,&nbsp;Suyuan Luo","doi":"10.1016/j.tre.2024.103759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the luxury industry, fashion brands like Burberry and Cartier are reported to destroy leftover products at the end of the selling season (Scenario BC). This helps to maintain products’ exclusivity image but creates a loss of goodwill because consumers in the market commonly value sustainability and responsibility. In the sharing economy, luxury fashion brands can sell their leftover products to certain platforms and generate revenue (Scenario PL), but doing so reduces the image of product exclusivity. In this paper, we establish stylized models and analytically investigate this operational problem. In the basic model, we consider the case in which the luxury fashion brand can choose between Scenarios BC and PL with deterministic leftover-product-handling effects. We find that Scenario PL outperforms Scenario BC in terms of both benefit and profit risk (i.e., <em>mean</em>–<em>variance dominating</em>) when (i) the inventory service level in Scenario PL is sufficiently small and (ii) either the demand volatility is sufficiently large or the loss of goodwill cost is sufficiently large. In the extended models, we first generalize the two-period model to a multiple <em>N</em>-period model. We then explore another case in which the leftover-product-handling effects brought by Scenarios BC and PL are stochastic, and we highlight the impacts of the associated uncertainties. Finally, we consider a third scenario in which leftover products are donated for charity. We find that the main insights derived from the basic model remain robust in all of the extended models. In short, in the sharing economy, with an alternative way of using the product leftovers and consumers commonly treasure sustainability, we argue that luxury brands should no longer destroy product leftovers. Our proposal is also in line with the current measures imposed on the luxury brands by European Union in which it is no longer legal for luxury brands to “burn” the product leftovers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49418,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 103759"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554524003508","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the luxury industry, fashion brands like Burberry and Cartier are reported to destroy leftover products at the end of the selling season (Scenario BC). This helps to maintain products’ exclusivity image but creates a loss of goodwill because consumers in the market commonly value sustainability and responsibility. In the sharing economy, luxury fashion brands can sell their leftover products to certain platforms and generate revenue (Scenario PL), but doing so reduces the image of product exclusivity. In this paper, we establish stylized models and analytically investigate this operational problem. In the basic model, we consider the case in which the luxury fashion brand can choose between Scenarios BC and PL with deterministic leftover-product-handling effects. We find that Scenario PL outperforms Scenario BC in terms of both benefit and profit risk (i.e., meanvariance dominating) when (i) the inventory service level in Scenario PL is sufficiently small and (ii) either the demand volatility is sufficiently large or the loss of goodwill cost is sufficiently large. In the extended models, we first generalize the two-period model to a multiple N-period model. We then explore another case in which the leftover-product-handling effects brought by Scenarios BC and PL are stochastic, and we highlight the impacts of the associated uncertainties. Finally, we consider a third scenario in which leftover products are donated for charity. We find that the main insights derived from the basic model remain robust in all of the extended models. In short, in the sharing economy, with an alternative way of using the product leftovers and consumers commonly treasure sustainability, we argue that luxury brands should no longer destroy product leftovers. Our proposal is also in line with the current measures imposed on the luxury brands by European Union in which it is no longer legal for luxury brands to “burn” the product leftovers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共享经济中的可持续性与排他性:剩余的奢侈时尚产品是否应该销毁?
据报道,在奢侈品行业,巴宝莉和卡地亚等时尚品牌会在销售季结束时销毁剩余产品(情景 BC)。这有助于维持产品的独家形象,但会造成商誉损失,因为市场上的消费者普遍重视可持续性和责任感。在共享经济中,奢侈时尚品牌可以将剩余产品出售给某些平台并获得收入(情景 PL),但这样做会降低产品的独家形象。在本文中,我们建立了风格化模型,并对这一操作问题进行了分析研究。在基本模型中,我们考虑了奢侈时尚品牌可以在具有确定性剩余产品处理效应的方案 BC 和方案 PL 之间做出选择的情况。我们发现,当 (i) 方案 PL 中的库存服务水平足够小,以及 (ii) 需求波动足够大或商誉损失成本足够大时,方案 PL 在收益和利润风险方面都优于方案 BC(即均值方差占优)。在扩展模型中,我们首先将两期模型推广到多 N 期模型。然后,我们探讨了另一种情况,即情景 BC 和 PL 带来的剩余产品处理效应是随机的,我们强调了相关不确定性的影响。最后,我们考虑了第三种情况,即剩余产品被捐赠给慈善机构。我们发现,从基本模型中得出的主要见解在所有扩展模型中都保持稳健。简而言之,在共享经济时代,由于有了另一种使用剩余产品的方式,而且消费者普遍珍视可持续发展,我们认为奢侈品牌不应再销毁剩余产品。我们的建议也符合欧盟目前对奢侈品牌采取的措施,即奢侈品牌 "焚烧 "剩余产品不再合法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.20
自引率
16.00%
发文量
285
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review is a reputable journal that publishes high-quality articles covering a wide range of topics in the field of logistics and transportation research. The journal welcomes submissions on various subjects, including transport economics, transport infrastructure and investment appraisal, evaluation of public policies related to transportation, empirical and analytical studies of logistics management practices and performance, logistics and operations models, and logistics and supply chain management. Part E aims to provide informative and well-researched articles that contribute to the understanding and advancement of the field. The content of the journal is complementary to other prestigious journals in transportation research, such as Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies, Part D: Transport and Environment, and Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. Together, these journals form a comprehensive and cohesive reference for current research in transportation science.
期刊最新文献
Optimal operation strategies for freight transport with electric vehicles considering wireless charging lanes Exploring spatiotemporal heterogeneity of urban green freight delivery parking based on new energy vehicle GPS data Air Corridor Planning for Urban Drone Delivery: Complexity Analysis and Comparison via Multi-Commodity Network Flow and Graph Search The parallel stack loading problem considering multiple batches of storage plates Unveiling coopetition dynamics between shared mobility and public transport: A game-theoretic approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1