Kiril Manevski , Sanna Steenfeldt , Anne Louise Frydendahl Hellwing , Heidi Mai-Lis Andersen , Uffe Jørgensen
{"title":"Nitrate leaching and nitrogen balances for integrated willow-poultry organic systems in Denmark","authors":"Kiril Manevski , Sanna Steenfeldt , Anne Louise Frydendahl Hellwing , Heidi Mai-Lis Andersen , Uffe Jørgensen","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><div>Integrating outdoor poultry production with agroforestry promotes both production and animal welfare, but very little data exist on field nitrate leaching and soil nitrogen (N) balances.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>The objective of the study was to quantify the effect of feed (soybean portion was partly replaced with ‘green’ protein from refined local biomass) and stocking density (low, 6 m<sup>2</sup> hen<sup>−1</sup>, high, 4 m<sup>2</sup> hen<sup>−1</sup>) on nitrate leaching and soil N mass balance (inputs minus outputs) in outdoor poultry systems combined with willow and grass agroforestry on sandy soils.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>The experiment was conducted in “organic” settings in Denmark on coarse sand soil cultivated with perennial grass-clover ley and short-rotation coppice with willow trees. Nitrate leaching was determined from soil nitrate concentrations measured at 1 m depth and water fluxes simulated by the process-based model <em>Daisy</em> for one full hydrological year involving the grazing period of spring-summer-autumn, and the winter and following spring.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>Observed soil nitrate concentrations were considerably lower and less variable in the willow zone compared to the grass zone. Nitrate leaching was significantly lower in the willow (26 ± 14 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>) compared to the grass zone (154 ± 28 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>). At factor level, nitrate leaching was comparable and marginally lower at low- compared to high stocking density. Feed input and manure output were major N flows in the paddocks, resulting in large surface N balance of 1198–1241 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> at high- and 843–875 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> at low stocking density, the lower end in each range being for the green-protein feed. The soil N balances were 26 % lower than the surface balances and similar between feed factors, yielding 614–634 and 899–906 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> for low and high stocking density, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><div>High spatial and temporal variability in nitrate destined for leaching from sandy soils remains challenging to control with short rotation coppiced willow in outdoor poultry paddocks on grass-clover ley. Reducing the stocking density of the hens by 33 % tightens the soil N balance for about 36 % (33–38 %), although further measures are necessary to reduce the N balance to levels environmentally suitable for agricultural soils.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"221 ","pages":"Article 104149"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24002993","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
CONTEXT
Integrating outdoor poultry production with agroforestry promotes both production and animal welfare, but very little data exist on field nitrate leaching and soil nitrogen (N) balances.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of the study was to quantify the effect of feed (soybean portion was partly replaced with ‘green’ protein from refined local biomass) and stocking density (low, 6 m2 hen−1, high, 4 m2 hen−1) on nitrate leaching and soil N mass balance (inputs minus outputs) in outdoor poultry systems combined with willow and grass agroforestry on sandy soils.
METHODS
The experiment was conducted in “organic” settings in Denmark on coarse sand soil cultivated with perennial grass-clover ley and short-rotation coppice with willow trees. Nitrate leaching was determined from soil nitrate concentrations measured at 1 m depth and water fluxes simulated by the process-based model Daisy for one full hydrological year involving the grazing period of spring-summer-autumn, and the winter and following spring.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
Observed soil nitrate concentrations were considerably lower and less variable in the willow zone compared to the grass zone. Nitrate leaching was significantly lower in the willow (26 ± 14 kg N ha−1) compared to the grass zone (154 ± 28 kg N ha−1). At factor level, nitrate leaching was comparable and marginally lower at low- compared to high stocking density. Feed input and manure output were major N flows in the paddocks, resulting in large surface N balance of 1198–1241 kg N ha−1 at high- and 843–875 kg N ha−1 at low stocking density, the lower end in each range being for the green-protein feed. The soil N balances were 26 % lower than the surface balances and similar between feed factors, yielding 614–634 and 899–906 kg N ha−1 for low and high stocking density, respectively.
SIGNIFICANCE
High spatial and temporal variability in nitrate destined for leaching from sandy soils remains challenging to control with short rotation coppiced willow in outdoor poultry paddocks on grass-clover ley. Reducing the stocking density of the hens by 33 % tightens the soil N balance for about 36 % (33–38 %), although further measures are necessary to reduce the N balance to levels environmentally suitable for agricultural soils.
期刊介绍:
Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments.
The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas:
Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making;
The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment;
Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems;
Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.