Eva Heeremans, Joyce De Temmerman, Hendrik Slabbinck, Maggie Geuens
{"title":"Packaging the future: Determinants of use intentions and incentive structures of reusable packaging systems","authors":"Eva Heeremans, Joyce De Temmerman, Hendrik Slabbinck, Maggie Geuens","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Growing environmental concerns regarding single-use packaging have prompted the introduction of reusable packaging systems. This research examines four systems: “refill on the go” (in-store dispensers), “refill at home” (larger refill packages), “return on the go” (returnable packaging), and “return from home” (subscription service for delivery and pickup). An online survey identified performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, and an affective component as significant predictors of consumers’ intentions to use these systems for non-food products. The “refill at home” system was most favored, followed by “refill on the go” and “return on the go”. Hence, consumers prefer larger refill packaging but are also open to in-store refilling or returning. A focus group with retail experts and four Maximum Difference scaling analyses emphasize the need to communicate the environmental benefits of reducing packaging waste and eliminating single-use packaging through these reusable packaging systems. Implications for policymakers, retailers, and manufacturers are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 107961"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344924005524","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Growing environmental concerns regarding single-use packaging have prompted the introduction of reusable packaging systems. This research examines four systems: “refill on the go” (in-store dispensers), “refill at home” (larger refill packages), “return on the go” (returnable packaging), and “return from home” (subscription service for delivery and pickup). An online survey identified performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, and an affective component as significant predictors of consumers’ intentions to use these systems for non-food products. The “refill at home” system was most favored, followed by “refill on the go” and “return on the go”. Hence, consumers prefer larger refill packaging but are also open to in-store refilling or returning. A focus group with retail experts and four Maximum Difference scaling analyses emphasize the need to communicate the environmental benefits of reducing packaging waste and eliminating single-use packaging through these reusable packaging systems. Implications for policymakers, retailers, and manufacturers are discussed.
期刊介绍:
The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns.
Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.