Toward Equitable Interventions in Public Mental Health: A Review.

IF 22.5 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY JAMA Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.3206
Ulrich Reininghaus,Annika S Reinhold,Stefan Priebe,Christian Rauschenberg,Leonie Fleck,Anita Schick,Frederike Schirmbeck,Inez Myin-Germeys,Craig Morgan,Jessica A Hartmann
{"title":"Toward Equitable Interventions in Public Mental Health: A Review.","authors":"Ulrich Reininghaus,Annika S Reinhold,Stefan Priebe,Christian Rauschenberg,Leonie Fleck,Anita Schick,Frederike Schirmbeck,Inez Myin-Germeys,Craig Morgan,Jessica A Hartmann","doi":"10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.3206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Importance\r\nThe field of public mental health is evolving to tackle the profound impact of global challenges such as climate change, migration, and health crises. These issues accentuate health and social inequities, necessitating a focus on how to achieve interventions that are equitable and enhance mental health across all societal strata.\r\n\r\nObservations\r\nPopulation-based interventions can inadvertently exacerbate mental health inequities if they are primarily assessed by, and beneficial to, the most advantaged. Dimensional approaches such as the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology offer a more nuanced understanding of mental health, capturing the whole spectrum of symptom severity in a culturally sensitive and less stigmatizing way. In addition, adopting intersectional, participatory, and settings-based approaches can help tailor interventions to the unique needs of marginalized groups.\r\n\r\nConclusions and Relevance\r\nIn moving toward more equitable interventions in public mental health, it is imperative to adopt an approach that integrates multiple frameworks to address the complexity of mental health inequities. At the core of this integrated approach is the recognition that mental health exists on a continuum. Intersectionality theory can help to identify the root (fundamental) causes of mental health while participatory and settings-based approaches ensure that interventions are relevant, culturally sensitive, and accessible to all. By adopting these approaches, interventions that are not only effective in \"shifting the curve\" toward better mental health, but are also equitable in their reach and impact, can be developed.","PeriodicalId":14800,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Psychiatry","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":22.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.3206","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance The field of public mental health is evolving to tackle the profound impact of global challenges such as climate change, migration, and health crises. These issues accentuate health and social inequities, necessitating a focus on how to achieve interventions that are equitable and enhance mental health across all societal strata. Observations Population-based interventions can inadvertently exacerbate mental health inequities if they are primarily assessed by, and beneficial to, the most advantaged. Dimensional approaches such as the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology offer a more nuanced understanding of mental health, capturing the whole spectrum of symptom severity in a culturally sensitive and less stigmatizing way. In addition, adopting intersectional, participatory, and settings-based approaches can help tailor interventions to the unique needs of marginalized groups. Conclusions and Relevance In moving toward more equitable interventions in public mental health, it is imperative to adopt an approach that integrates multiple frameworks to address the complexity of mental health inequities. At the core of this integrated approach is the recognition that mental health exists on a continuum. Intersectionality theory can help to identify the root (fundamental) causes of mental health while participatory and settings-based approaches ensure that interventions are relevant, culturally sensitive, and accessible to all. By adopting these approaches, interventions that are not only effective in "shifting the curve" toward better mental health, but are also equitable in their reach and impact, can be developed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实现公共心理健康的公平干预:回顾。
重要性公共心理健康领域正在不断发展,以应对气候变化、移民和健康危机等全球挑战的深远影响。这些问题加剧了健康和社会的不平等,因此有必要关注如何在社会各阶层实现公平的干预措施,并提高心理健康水平。意见基于人群的干预措施如果主要由最有优势的人群来评估并使其受益,则可能会无意中加剧心理健康的不平等。精神病理学层次分类法等维度方法提供了对心理健康更细致入微的理解,以文化敏感性和较少污名化的方式捕捉了症状严重程度的整个范围。此外,采用交叉性、参与性和基于环境的方法可以帮助定制干预措施,以满足边缘化群体的独特需求。结论与相关性在公共心理健康领域采取更公平的干预措施时,当务之急是采用一种整合多种框架的方法来应对心理健康不公平的复杂性。这种综合方法的核心是认识到心理健康是一个连续体。交叉性理论可以帮助确定心理健康的根本(根本)原因,而参与式方法和基于环境的方法则可以确保干预措施具有相关性、文化敏感性,并为所有人所接受。通过采用这些方法,可以制定出不仅能有效地 "改变曲线 "以改善心理健康,而且在覆盖范围和影响方面也是公平的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA Psychiatry
JAMA Psychiatry PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
30.60
自引率
1.90%
发文量
233
期刊介绍: JAMA Psychiatry is a global, peer-reviewed journal catering to clinicians, scholars, and research scientists in psychiatry, mental health, behavioral science, and related fields. The Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry originated in 1919, splitting into two journals in 1959: Archives of Neurology and Archives of General Psychiatry. In 2013, these evolved into JAMA Neurology and JAMA Psychiatry, respectively. JAMA Psychiatry is affiliated with the JAMA Network, a group of peer-reviewed medical and specialty publications.
期刊最新文献
Ending Unequal Treatment for People With Behavioral Health Conditions. Error in Results and Figure. War Exposure and DNA Methylation in Syrian Refugee Children and Adolescents. Repurposing Semaglutide and Liraglutide for Alcohol Use Disorder Synaptic Density in Early Stages of Psychosis and Clinical High Risk
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1