Assessing the evolution of Public Transportation demand over time based on real data through survival analysis in Bologna, Italy

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Transportation Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI:10.1007/s11116-024-10541-1
Alessandro Nalin, Claudio Lantieri, Valeria Vignali, Andrea Simone
{"title":"Assessing the evolution of Public Transportation demand over time based on real data through survival analysis in Bologna, Italy","authors":"Alessandro Nalin, Claudio Lantieri, Valeria Vignali, Andrea Simone","doi":"10.1007/s11116-024-10541-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Public Transportation (PT) is a universal service in most countries, and it is acknowledged for its social and environmental role in enhancing accessibility and promoting a sustainable transport system. However, when disruptions alter the service, the level of service (LoS) can be massively affected. Consequently, the perceived quality can be influenced, and users can be encouraged (or forced) to modify their subsequent modal choice, in accordance with the users’ socioeconomic profile. A survival analysis, namely a Cox proportional hazards model, was tested in Bologna, Italy, using real data provided by TPER S.p.A, specifically Automatic Vehicle Location (AVL) and Automatic Passenger Counter (APC). This analysis aimed to assess the variations in demand over time taking into account variables related to the socioeconomic characteristics of the demand and several service attributes. The results contribute to the literature in several ways. Firstly, they confirm the predominant role of PT in the modal alternative spectrum of disadvantaged users. Secondly, they provide insights into the perception of quality service among different user categories, including commuters and non-frequent users.</p>","PeriodicalId":49419,"journal":{"name":"Transportation","volume":"231 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-024-10541-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Public Transportation (PT) is a universal service in most countries, and it is acknowledged for its social and environmental role in enhancing accessibility and promoting a sustainable transport system. However, when disruptions alter the service, the level of service (LoS) can be massively affected. Consequently, the perceived quality can be influenced, and users can be encouraged (or forced) to modify their subsequent modal choice, in accordance with the users’ socioeconomic profile. A survival analysis, namely a Cox proportional hazards model, was tested in Bologna, Italy, using real data provided by TPER S.p.A, specifically Automatic Vehicle Location (AVL) and Automatic Passenger Counter (APC). This analysis aimed to assess the variations in demand over time taking into account variables related to the socioeconomic characteristics of the demand and several service attributes. The results contribute to the literature in several ways. Firstly, they confirm the predominant role of PT in the modal alternative spectrum of disadvantaged users. Secondly, they provide insights into the perception of quality service among different user categories, including commuters and non-frequent users.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过生存分析评估意大利博洛尼亚公共交通需求随时间变化的真实数据
公共交通(PT)在大多数国家都是一项普遍服务,它在提高可达性和促进可持续交通系统方面发挥着公认的社会和环境作用。然而,当服务中断时,服务水平(LoS)会受到巨大影响。因此,用户的感知质量可能会受到影响,从而鼓励(或迫使)用户根据其社会经济状况改变其随后的交通方式选择。在意大利博洛尼亚,利用 TPER S.p.A 提供的真实数据,特别是车辆自动定位(AVL)和乘客自动计数器(APC),对生存分析(即 Cox 比例危险模型)进行了测试。该分析旨在评估需求随时间的变化,同时考虑到与需求的社会经济特征和若干服务属性相关的变量。分析结果在多个方面对相关文献做出了贡献。首先,它们证实了公共交通在弱势用户的模式选择范围中占据主导地位。其次,研究还深入分析了不同用户类别(包括通勤者和非经常使用者)对优质服务的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation
Transportation 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
4.70%
发文量
94
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: In our first issue, published in 1972, we explained that this Journal is intended to promote the free and vigorous exchange of ideas and experience among the worldwide community actively concerned with transportation policy, planning and practice. That continues to be our mission, with a clear focus on topics concerned with research and practice in transportation policy and planning, around the world. These four words, policy and planning, research and practice are our key words. While we have a particular focus on transportation policy analysis and travel behaviour in the context of ground transportation, we willingly consider all good quality papers that are highly relevant to transportation policy, planning and practice with a clear focus on innovation, on extending the international pool of knowledge and understanding. Our interest is not only with transportation policies - and systems and services – but also with their social, economic and environmental impacts, However, papers about the application of established procedures to, or the development of plans or policies for, specific locations are unlikely to prove acceptable unless they report experience which will be of real benefit those working elsewhere. Papers concerned with the engineering, safety and operational management of transportation systems are outside our scope.
期刊最新文献
Transit modal complementarity: measuring the access provided by transfers Multifunctional lightweight autonomous vehicles: an agent-based study Policy paradigms as an analytical concept in transport studies research Quantifying the impact of metrorail transport quality factors on overall user satisfaction: a Brazilian case study A Conservation of Resources theory-based framework for studying the commute experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1