Influence of land use intensity on urban carbon efficiency under a carbon neutrality target: Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration, China

IF 9.8 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environmental Impact Assessment Review Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI:10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107689
Xu Wu , Shengyang Zhong , Gang Chen , Chenghe Wu , Jiayin Han , Zhiquan Qian
{"title":"Influence of land use intensity on urban carbon efficiency under a carbon neutrality target: Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration, China","authors":"Xu Wu ,&nbsp;Shengyang Zhong ,&nbsp;Gang Chen ,&nbsp;Chenghe Wu ,&nbsp;Jiayin Han ,&nbsp;Zhiquan Qian","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urban carbon efficiency (UCE) is a critical measure for guiding cities in reducing carbon emissions while sustaining economic growth. Enhancing UCEs through efficient urban land use is considered a key strategy. However, while previous research has explored the impact of urban land use on carbon efficiency, the influence under the constraints of carbon neutrality targets remains underexamined. To fill this gap, we apply a super-efficiency slack-based measure (SBM) model combined with a seemingly unrelated regression (SUR) model to assess the heterogeneous effects of land use intensity on UCEs within the carbon neutrality framework. Additionally, we use a causal mediation effect model to identify the mediating factors. Using data from 2000 to 2019 for 41 prefecture-level cities in China's Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration, we find the following: (1) A 1% decrease in land use intensity (urban land use per unit of GDP) leads to a 0.745% increase in UCE and a 0.227% increase in carbon neutrality potential (CNP) when carbon sequestration is included in the UCE calculation, both at a significance level of 1%. (2) The negative effects of land use intensity show significant heterogeneity across different city types. Specifically, it significantly impacts both UCE and CNP in cities with high economic levels and low ecological levels but significantly affects only UCE in other cities. (3) The urban population and built-up area amplify the influence of land use intensity on UCEs through mediating effects, whereas factors such as industrial structure, energy intensity, and foreign direct investment mitigate this influence. These findings underscore the importance of incorporating carbon sequestration in UCE assessments under carbon neutrality constraints. They also suggest that policy-makers should adopt differentiated urban land management strategies tailored to the socioeconomic and ecological conditions of different cities to enhance UCEs within urban agglomerations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 107689"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925524002762","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urban carbon efficiency (UCE) is a critical measure for guiding cities in reducing carbon emissions while sustaining economic growth. Enhancing UCEs through efficient urban land use is considered a key strategy. However, while previous research has explored the impact of urban land use on carbon efficiency, the influence under the constraints of carbon neutrality targets remains underexamined. To fill this gap, we apply a super-efficiency slack-based measure (SBM) model combined with a seemingly unrelated regression (SUR) model to assess the heterogeneous effects of land use intensity on UCEs within the carbon neutrality framework. Additionally, we use a causal mediation effect model to identify the mediating factors. Using data from 2000 to 2019 for 41 prefecture-level cities in China's Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration, we find the following: (1) A 1% decrease in land use intensity (urban land use per unit of GDP) leads to a 0.745% increase in UCE and a 0.227% increase in carbon neutrality potential (CNP) when carbon sequestration is included in the UCE calculation, both at a significance level of 1%. (2) The negative effects of land use intensity show significant heterogeneity across different city types. Specifically, it significantly impacts both UCE and CNP in cities with high economic levels and low ecological levels but significantly affects only UCE in other cities. (3) The urban population and built-up area amplify the influence of land use intensity on UCEs through mediating effects, whereas factors such as industrial structure, energy intensity, and foreign direct investment mitigate this influence. These findings underscore the importance of incorporating carbon sequestration in UCE assessments under carbon neutrality constraints. They also suggest that policy-makers should adopt differentiated urban land management strategies tailored to the socioeconomic and ecological conditions of different cities to enhance UCEs within urban agglomerations.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
碳中和目标下土地利用强度对城市碳效率的影响:来自中国长江三角洲城市群的证据
城市碳效率(UCE)是指导城市在保持经济增长的同时减少碳排放的关键措施。通过有效利用城市土地提高城市碳效率被认为是一项关键战略。然而,尽管之前的研究已经探讨了城市土地利用对碳效率的影响,但对碳中和目标约束下的影响仍未进行深入研究。为了填补这一空白,我们采用了基于松弛度量的超效率(SBM)模型,结合看似无关回归(SUR)模型,在碳中和框架内评估土地利用强度对城市能源效率的异质性影响。此外,我们还使用因果中介效应模型来识别中介因素。利用 2000 年至 2019 年中国长江三角洲城市群 41 个地级市的数据,我们发现了以下情况:(1) 土地利用强度(单位 GDP 的城市土地利用)每降低 1%,UCE 将增加 0.745%,如果将碳封存纳入 UCE 计算,碳中和潜力(CNP)将增加 0.227%,显著性水平均为 1%。(2)土地利用强度的负面影响在不同城市类型中表现出显著的异质性。具体而言,在经济水平高、生态水平低的城市,土地利用强度对城市碳排放系数和国家碳储量都有显著影响,但在其他城市,土地利用强度仅对城市碳排放系数有显著影响。(3) 城市人口和建成区通过中介效应放大了土地利用强度对 UCE 的影响,而产业结构、能源强度和外商直接投资等因素则减轻了这种影响。这些发现强调了在碳中和约束条件下将碳封存纳入UCE评估的重要性。这些研究还建议,政策制定者应根据不同城市的社会经济和生态条件,采取差异化的城市土地管理策略,以提高城市群内的 UCE。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
期刊最新文献
When differentiated carbon tax policy meets LBD of renewable energy and electrification of energy end-use: Policy implications of sectoral differentiation of carbon productivity and carbon emission Climate policy and carbon leakage: Evidence from the low-carbon city pilot program in China Reducing fertilizer and pesticide application through mandatory agri-environmental regulation: Insights from “Two Zero” policy in China Unveiling the heterogeneity of environmental impacts of China's coal washing plants by a configuration-specific life cycle assessment Moving in the landscape: Omnidirectional connectivity dynamics in China from 1985 to 2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1