Digital media revolution and stratificational inertia: A historical study of media usage and sociopolitical stratification in the age of social media

IF 2 2区 社会学 0 LITERATURE Poetics Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI:10.1016/j.poetic.2024.101942
Majsa Stina Grosen , Morten Fischer Sivertsen , Jannie Møller Hartley
{"title":"Digital media revolution and stratificational inertia: A historical study of media usage and sociopolitical stratification in the age of social media","authors":"Majsa Stina Grosen ,&nbsp;Morten Fischer Sivertsen ,&nbsp;Jannie Møller Hartley","doi":"10.1016/j.poetic.2024.101942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Very few studies have deployed a historical focus in investigating how changes in the media environment in the twenty-first century have altered the connection between cross-media consumption, political (dis)interest, and dimensions of social stratification. This paper contributes to the literature on the nexus between democracy, citizens, and media through a historical study of media use among Danish citizens from 2008, which we argue should be considered the beginning of the social media era in the Danish context, to 2021, when social media was popularised among the wider Danish population. Based on three representative surveys on Danish adults’ media consumption in 2008, 2017, and 2021, we deployed multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) to investigate two related inquiries: first, a study of differentiation in cross-media consumption and, second, an examination of how such differentiation patterns are linked to social and political divides. This study contributes in two ways. First, it contributes to the methodological advancement of multiple correspondence analysis by addressing the challenge of conducting a cross-sectional design with changing variables and individuals. It accomplishes this discussing a recent approach centered on the formation of triads of variables. Second, it analytically shows that despite major changes in the media environment between 2008 and 2021, media use is consistently structured according to divisions, first in online and traditional media use and, second, between high levels of news consumption (as opposed to entertainment consumption) and news avoidance. These lines of division are consistently differentiated by age, social inequalities, and political orientation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47900,"journal":{"name":"Poetics","volume":"107 ","pages":"Article 101942"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Poetics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304422X24000810","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Very few studies have deployed a historical focus in investigating how changes in the media environment in the twenty-first century have altered the connection between cross-media consumption, political (dis)interest, and dimensions of social stratification. This paper contributes to the literature on the nexus between democracy, citizens, and media through a historical study of media use among Danish citizens from 2008, which we argue should be considered the beginning of the social media era in the Danish context, to 2021, when social media was popularised among the wider Danish population. Based on three representative surveys on Danish adults’ media consumption in 2008, 2017, and 2021, we deployed multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) to investigate two related inquiries: first, a study of differentiation in cross-media consumption and, second, an examination of how such differentiation patterns are linked to social and political divides. This study contributes in two ways. First, it contributes to the methodological advancement of multiple correspondence analysis by addressing the challenge of conducting a cross-sectional design with changing variables and individuals. It accomplishes this discussing a recent approach centered on the formation of triads of variables. Second, it analytically shows that despite major changes in the media environment between 2008 and 2021, media use is consistently structured according to divisions, first in online and traditional media use and, second, between high levels of news consumption (as opposed to entertainment consumption) and news avoidance. These lines of division are consistently differentiated by age, social inequalities, and political orientation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字媒体革命与分层惯性:社交媒体时代媒体使用与社会政治分层的历史研究
很少有研究以历史为重点,调查 21 世纪媒体环境的变化如何改变了跨媒体消费、政治(不)兴趣和社会分层之间的联系。我们认为,2008 年是丹麦社交媒体时代的开端,而 2021 年则是社交媒体在更广泛的丹麦人口中得到普及的时期,本文通过对 2008 年至 2021 年丹麦公民的媒体使用情况进行历史研究,为有关民主、公民和媒体之间关系的文献做出贡献。基于 2008 年、2017 年和 2021 年三次具有代表性的丹麦成年人媒体消费调查,我们采用多重对应分析法(MCA)研究了两个相关问题:第一,跨媒体消费的差异化研究;第二,研究这种差异化模式如何与社会和政治分歧相关联。本研究有两方面的贡献。首先,它解决了在变量和个体不断变化的情况下进行横截面设计所面临的挑战,从而推动了多重对应分析方法的发展。为此,本研究讨论了一种以变量三元组的形成为中心的最新方法。其次,它通过分析表明,尽管 2008 年至 2021 年间媒体环境发生了重大变化,但媒体使用的结构始终保持分化,首先是网络媒体和传统媒体的使用,其次是高水平新闻消费(相对于娱乐消费)和新闻回避之间的分化。这些分界线始终按年龄、社会不平等和政治取向进行区分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Poetics
Poetics Multiple-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
16.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Poetics is an interdisciplinary journal of theoretical and empirical research on culture, the media and the arts. Particularly welcome are papers that make an original contribution to the major disciplines - sociology, psychology, media and communication studies, and economics - within which promising lines of research on culture, media and the arts have been developed.
期刊最新文献
Reconfiguring “Heritage hip-hop” From the scenes: Rightful youth rebellion and localised authenticity in the Huxiang Flow The role of hope and fear in the impact of climate fiction on climate action intentions: Evidence from India and USA Divergences and convergences across European musical preferences: How taste varies within and between countries Designed for success or failure: Differences in funding and rejection in the space of applications to the Danish Art Foundation among craftsmen and designers Mapping knowledge: Topic analysis of science locates researchers in disciplinary landscape
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1