Sex differences in close friendships and social style

IF 3 1区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Evolution and Human Behavior Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2024.106631
{"title":"Sex differences in close friendships and social style","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2024.106631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Friendships play a central role in human sociality, and are a major influence, both directly and indirectly, on our fitness. The two most important forms of friendship are the support clique and the best friend. Although the basis on which we choose friends and romantic partners have been studied in considerable detail, we know a great deal less about how individuals' own psychological traits affect whom they form relationships with. Here, we use an ethnically homogenous UK sample of 757 adults (aged 18–75 years; 56 % female) attending national science festivals to show that there are striking differences between men and women in both the structure of friendship groups and the psychological mechanisms that underpin their capacity to hold and maintain close friendships. Individual differences in the size and structure of women's cliques, and their likelihood of having a best friend, are underpinned mainly by prosocial tendencies, whereas in men they correlate negatively with anti-social, rather than prosocial, tendencies. These findings add to the evidence that male and female social worlds are organised in very different ways. This begs the evolutionary question as to why this is so.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55159,"journal":{"name":"Evolution and Human Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolution and Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513824001077","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Friendships play a central role in human sociality, and are a major influence, both directly and indirectly, on our fitness. The two most important forms of friendship are the support clique and the best friend. Although the basis on which we choose friends and romantic partners have been studied in considerable detail, we know a great deal less about how individuals' own psychological traits affect whom they form relationships with. Here, we use an ethnically homogenous UK sample of 757 adults (aged 18–75 years; 56 % female) attending national science festivals to show that there are striking differences between men and women in both the structure of friendship groups and the psychological mechanisms that underpin their capacity to hold and maintain close friendships. Individual differences in the size and structure of women's cliques, and their likelihood of having a best friend, are underpinned mainly by prosocial tendencies, whereas in men they correlate negatively with anti-social, rather than prosocial, tendencies. These findings add to the evidence that male and female social worlds are organised in very different ways. This begs the evolutionary question as to why this is so.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亲密友谊和社交风格的性别差异
友谊在人类社会中起着核心作用,对我们的健康有着直接或间接的重要影响。最重要的两种友谊形式是支持小团体和最好的朋友。尽管我们已经对选择朋友和恋爱伙伴的基础进行了相当详细的研究,但对于个人自身的心理特征如何影响他们与谁建立关系,我们却知之甚少。在这里,我们使用一个英国同种族的样本,对参加全国科学节的 757 名成年人(年龄在 18-75 岁之间;56% 为女性)进行了研究,结果表明,男性和女性在友谊群体的结构以及支持他们建立和维持亲密友谊的心理机制方面都存在显著差异。女性小团体的规模和结构的个体差异,以及她们拥有最好朋友的可能性,主要由亲社会倾向支撑,而男性则与反社会倾向而非亲社会倾向呈负相关。这些发现进一步证明,男性和女性的社会世界是以非常不同的方式组织起来的。这就引出了一个进化问题:为什么会这样?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Evolution and Human Behavior
Evolution and Human Behavior 生物-行为科学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
62
审稿时长
82 days
期刊介绍: Evolution and Human Behavior is an interdisciplinary journal, presenting research reports and theory in which evolutionary perspectives are brought to bear on the study of human behavior. It is primarily a scientific journal, but submissions from scholars in the humanities are also encouraged. Papers reporting on theoretical and empirical work on other species will be welcome if their relevance to the human animal is apparent.
期刊最新文献
Even small differences in attractiveness and formidability affect the probability and speed of selection: An online study and an offline replication Deep neural networks generate facial metrics that overcome limitations of previous methods and predict in-person attraction Sex differences in close friendships and social style Perceptions of facial trustworthiness and dominance modulate early neural responses to male facial sexual dimorphism Men (but not women) prefer to live in economically equal societies when it comes to mating: A five-study investigation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1