Stability analysis of dry matter and seed yield of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) walp.] genotypes in humid and lowland areas of southwestern Ethiopia

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Ecological Genetics and Genomics Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1016/j.egg.2024.100295
{"title":"Stability analysis of dry matter and seed yield of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) walp.] genotypes in humid and lowland areas of southwestern Ethiopia","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.egg.2024.100295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cowpea is a multi-purpose legume interested in dealing with genotype and genotype-by-environment interaction which has a significant impact on the success of breeding method. Twelve cowpea genotypes were examined across three experimental sites in Southwest Ethiopia through the cropping seasons in 2020 and 2021. A randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications for each location was applied to complete the trials, and the dry mater and seed yields were recorded and analyzed using AMMI and GGE biplot models. Dry matter yield (DMY) was significantly influenced by genotype (35.51 %), environment (34.25 %), and genotype by environment (G × E) interface (24.82 %), according to the combined analysis of variance. On the other hand, seed yield (SY) was highly influenced by the environment (39.93 %), genotype-environment (G × E) (19.08 %), and genotype (11.88 %). For both dry matter and seed yield, the investigated genotypes were divided into four mega-environments using AMMI and GGE biplot. The initial mega-environment contain E6, the subsequent contain E3 and E5, the third one has E1 and E2, and the final mega-environment hold E4 for dry matter and E3, E4, and E6, E5, as well as E1, and E2 for seed yield. The GGE biplot revealed that the three vertex genotypes for dry matter yield, G6, G7, and G10 whereas, six vertexes for seed yield G2, G6, G8, G7, G11, and G10, scored higher yield in corresponding environment, while the AMMI model showed G4, G6, G9, and G10 were comparably stable and high yielders for DMY and G4, G5, and G9 were for SY, whereas G6 and G7 had the highest SY but were unstable genotypes. Based on the AEC line, genotypes represented by G4, and G9 were relatively stable and high yielders for both DMY and SY. The selected genotypes could be suggested for variety development in the region.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37938,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Genetics and Genomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Genetics and Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240598542400079X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cowpea is a multi-purpose legume interested in dealing with genotype and genotype-by-environment interaction which has a significant impact on the success of breeding method. Twelve cowpea genotypes were examined across three experimental sites in Southwest Ethiopia through the cropping seasons in 2020 and 2021. A randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications for each location was applied to complete the trials, and the dry mater and seed yields were recorded and analyzed using AMMI and GGE biplot models. Dry matter yield (DMY) was significantly influenced by genotype (35.51 %), environment (34.25 %), and genotype by environment (G × E) interface (24.82 %), according to the combined analysis of variance. On the other hand, seed yield (SY) was highly influenced by the environment (39.93 %), genotype-environment (G × E) (19.08 %), and genotype (11.88 %). For both dry matter and seed yield, the investigated genotypes were divided into four mega-environments using AMMI and GGE biplot. The initial mega-environment contain E6, the subsequent contain E3 and E5, the third one has E1 and E2, and the final mega-environment hold E4 for dry matter and E3, E4, and E6, E5, as well as E1, and E2 for seed yield. The GGE biplot revealed that the three vertex genotypes for dry matter yield, G6, G7, and G10 whereas, six vertexes for seed yield G2, G6, G8, G7, G11, and G10, scored higher yield in corresponding environment, while the AMMI model showed G4, G6, G9, and G10 were comparably stable and high yielders for DMY and G4, G5, and G9 were for SY, whereas G6 and G7 had the highest SY but were unstable genotypes. Based on the AEC line, genotypes represented by G4, and G9 were relatively stable and high yielders for both DMY and SY. The selected genotypes could be suggested for variety development in the region.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃塞俄比亚西南部潮湿和低洼地区豇豆[Vigna unguiculata (L.) walp.]基因型干物质和种子产量的稳定性分析
豇豆是一种多用途豆科植物,其基因型和基因型与环境之间的相互作用对育种方法的成功与否有着重要影响。在 2020 年和 2021 年的耕种季节,对埃塞俄比亚西南部三个实验点的 12 个豇豆基因型进行了研究。试验采用随机完全区组设计(RCBD),每个地点三次重复,记录干物质和种子产量,并使用 AMMI 和 GGE 双图模型进行分析。根据综合方差分析,干物质产量(DMY)受基因型(35.51 %)、环境(34.25 %)和基因型与环境(G × E)界面(24.82 %)的显著影响。另一方面,种子产量(SY)受环境(39.93 %)、基因型-环境(G × E)(19.08 %)和基因型(11.88 %)的影响较大。对于干物质和种子产量,利用 AMMI 和 GGE 双图将所研究的基因型划分为四个巨型环境。最初的巨型环境包括 E6,随后的巨型环境包括 E3 和 E5,第三个巨型环境包括 E1 和 E2,最后一个巨型环境的干物质含量为 E4,种子产量为 E3、E4、E6、E5 以及 E1 和 E2。GGE 双图显示,干物质产量的三个顶点基因型 G6、G7 和 G10 在相应的环境中产量较高,而种子产量的六个顶点基因型 G2、G6、G8、G7、G11 和 G10 在相应的环境中产量较高,而 AMMI 模型显示,G4、G6、G9 和 G10 是 DMY 比较稳定的高产基因型,G4、G5 和 G9 是 SY 比较稳定的高产基因型,而 G6 和 G7 具有最高的 SY,但却是不稳定的基因型。根据 AEC 品系,以 G4 和 G9 为代表的基因型在 DMY 和 SY 方面都相对稳定和高产。所选基因型可用于该地区的品种开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Genetics and Genomics
Ecological Genetics and Genomics Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Ecological Genetics and Genomics publishes ecological studies of broad interest that provide significant insight into ecological interactions or/ and species diversification. New data in these areas are published as research papers, or methods and resource reports that provide novel information on technologies or tools that will be of interest to a broad readership. Complete data sets are shared where appropriate. The journal also provides Reviews, and Perspectives articles, which present commentary on the latest advances published both here and elsewhere, placing such progress in its broader biological context. Topics include: -metagenomics -population genetics/genomics -evolutionary ecology -conservation and molecular adaptation -speciation genetics -environmental and marine genomics -ecological simulation -genomic divergence of organisms
期刊最新文献
The impact of varying levels of Gibberellic Acid (GA3) on plant growth, flowering, flower quality, seed yield, and quality of Petunia(Petunia × hybrida Vilm.) Genetic basis of coat colour variation in members of genus Panthera Genetic diversity and structure of Tunisian and Indian date palm (Phoenix dactylifera and sylvestris) cultivars and genotypes revealed by AFLP markers Deciphering genome sequence of Paenibacillus illinoisensis strain YWY-3.1: A chitinase, cellulase, and amylase producer Detection of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase genes among Escherichia coli isolates of buffalo mastitis milk
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1