Synergistic effect of emission trading scheme and carbon tax: A CGE model-based study in China

IF 9.8 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environmental Impact Assessment Review Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107699
Zhijie Jia , Shiyan Wen , Rongxin Wu
{"title":"Synergistic effect of emission trading scheme and carbon tax: A CGE model-based study in China","authors":"Zhijie Jia ,&nbsp;Shiyan Wen ,&nbsp;Rongxin Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Effective carbon pricing systems are essential for combating climate change, yet the synergistic potential of combined approaches remains underexplored. This study delves into the interaction effects of carbon emissions trading scheme (ETS) and carbon taxes using a dynamic recursive computable general equilibrium model. By developing six distinct policy scenarios, this study analyzes variations in emission mitigation effectiveness and associated costs. The findings highlight significant differences between implementing a comprehensive tax approach (CTA), which imposes a carbon tax on all industries, and a coverage-targeted only approach (CTO), which applies the carbon tax only to industries not covered by ETS. The CTO approach, while limited in its direct impact on high energy-intensive industries, demonstrates a substantial synergistic effect when combined with ETS. This synergy results in an additional reduction of 32 million tons of CO<sub>2</sub> and an economic cost of 5.24 billion yuan in GDP losses by 2030. Conversely, the CTA fails to achieve effective synergy with ETS, resulting in lower carbon prices and diminished carbon constraint capabilities. These insights underline the importance of strategic policy design in carbon mitigation, suggesting that a targeted approach can amplify the benefits of emissions trading systems. This study provides valuable guidance for policymakers aiming to enhance the effectiveness of carbon reduction strategies through integrated policy measures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 107699"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925524002865","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Effective carbon pricing systems are essential for combating climate change, yet the synergistic potential of combined approaches remains underexplored. This study delves into the interaction effects of carbon emissions trading scheme (ETS) and carbon taxes using a dynamic recursive computable general equilibrium model. By developing six distinct policy scenarios, this study analyzes variations in emission mitigation effectiveness and associated costs. The findings highlight significant differences between implementing a comprehensive tax approach (CTA), which imposes a carbon tax on all industries, and a coverage-targeted only approach (CTO), which applies the carbon tax only to industries not covered by ETS. The CTO approach, while limited in its direct impact on high energy-intensive industries, demonstrates a substantial synergistic effect when combined with ETS. This synergy results in an additional reduction of 32 million tons of CO2 and an economic cost of 5.24 billion yuan in GDP losses by 2030. Conversely, the CTA fails to achieve effective synergy with ETS, resulting in lower carbon prices and diminished carbon constraint capabilities. These insights underline the importance of strategic policy design in carbon mitigation, suggesting that a targeted approach can amplify the benefits of emissions trading systems. This study provides valuable guidance for policymakers aiming to enhance the effectiveness of carbon reduction strategies through integrated policy measures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
排放交易计划与碳税的协同效应:基于 CGE 模型的中国研究
有效的碳定价系统对于应对气候变化至关重要,然而,综合方法的协同潜力仍未得到充分发掘。本研究利用动态递归可计算一般均衡模型,深入探讨了碳排放交易计划(ETS)和碳税的互动效应。通过制定六种不同的政策情景,本研究分析了减排效果和相关成本的变化。研究结果表明,在对所有行业征收碳税的全面征税方法(CTA)和仅针对覆盖范围的方法(CTO)之间存在显著差异,前者仅对排放交易计划未覆盖的行业征收碳税。CTO 方法虽然对高能耗产业的直接影响有限,但与排放交易计划相结合,却能产生巨大的协同效应。到 2030 年,这种协同效应可额外减少 3200 万吨二氧化碳,并减少 52.4 亿元 GDP 损失的经济成本。相反,CTA 未能与 ETS 实现有效协同,导致碳价格下降和碳约束能力减弱。这些见解强调了战略性政策设计在碳减排中的重要性,表明有针对性的方法可以放大排放交易体系的效益。本研究为旨在通过综合政策措施提高碳减排战略有效性的政策制定者提供了宝贵的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
期刊最新文献
When differentiated carbon tax policy meets LBD of renewable energy and electrification of energy end-use: Policy implications of sectoral differentiation of carbon productivity and carbon emission Climate policy and carbon leakage: Evidence from the low-carbon city pilot program in China Reducing fertilizer and pesticide application through mandatory agri-environmental regulation: Insights from “Two Zero” policy in China Unveiling the heterogeneity of environmental impacts of China's coal washing plants by a configuration-specific life cycle assessment Moving in the landscape: Omnidirectional connectivity dynamics in China from 1985 to 2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1