Distinguishing DRESS syndrome from drug rash and eosinophilia: Beyond RegiSCAR criteria

Grace Thompson MBBS , Syed Ali MBBS , Michelle Trevenen PhD , Philip Vlaskovsky PhD , Kevin Murray PhD , Michaela Lucas MD
{"title":"Distinguishing DRESS syndrome from drug rash and eosinophilia: Beyond RegiSCAR criteria","authors":"Grace Thompson MBBS ,&nbsp;Syed Ali MBBS ,&nbsp;Michelle Trevenen PhD ,&nbsp;Philip Vlaskovsky PhD ,&nbsp;Kevin Murray PhD ,&nbsp;Michaela Lucas MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacig.2024.100346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Diagnosing drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) can be challenging.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We sought to identify clinical and laboratory features outside of the Registry of Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reaction (RegiSCAR) criteria that distinguish patients with probable DRESS (RegiSCAR ≥ 4) from those with drug rash and eosinophilia (DRE).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using international coding classifications of drug-induced fever, generalized skin eruption due to medications, and eosinophilia, a retrospective audit from 2008 to 2023 of hospitalized patients was performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Forty-four cases of DRESS were compared to 80 cases of DRE. In addition to the RegiSCAR distinguishing factors for DRESS were longer drug latency before symptom onset (median 21 vs 5 days, <em>P</em> &lt; .001) and higher alanine transaminase levels (increase by a factor of 2.49 [95% confidence interval, 1.56, 4.00; <em>P</em> = .009]). Follow-up (mean 5.67 years) revealed a low rate of statewide drug alert reporting (29.6%) and drug allergy testing in DRESS (20.5%). Inadvertent reexposure to a culprit or structurally related drug resulted in recurrent DRESS in 3 patients (7.5%), and tolerance of structurally related drugs occurred in 8 patients (17.5%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In this large study evaluating DRE patients whose disease does not meet the RegiSCAR criteria for DRESS, we found that additional factors outside the RegiSCAR criteria may help clinicians differentiate DRESS, which is critical for optimal and timely patient management. Our study also highlights the need for development of local protocols to ensure appropriate allergy labeling and testing are performed to prevent recurrent DRESS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":75041,"journal":{"name":"The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global","volume":"3 4","pages":"Article 100346"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772829324001425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Diagnosing drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) can be challenging.

Objectives

We sought to identify clinical and laboratory features outside of the Registry of Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reaction (RegiSCAR) criteria that distinguish patients with probable DRESS (RegiSCAR ≥ 4) from those with drug rash and eosinophilia (DRE).

Methods

Using international coding classifications of drug-induced fever, generalized skin eruption due to medications, and eosinophilia, a retrospective audit from 2008 to 2023 of hospitalized patients was performed.

Results

Forty-four cases of DRESS were compared to 80 cases of DRE. In addition to the RegiSCAR distinguishing factors for DRESS were longer drug latency before symptom onset (median 21 vs 5 days, P < .001) and higher alanine transaminase levels (increase by a factor of 2.49 [95% confidence interval, 1.56, 4.00; P = .009]). Follow-up (mean 5.67 years) revealed a low rate of statewide drug alert reporting (29.6%) and drug allergy testing in DRESS (20.5%). Inadvertent reexposure to a culprit or structurally related drug resulted in recurrent DRESS in 3 patients (7.5%), and tolerance of structurally related drugs occurred in 8 patients (17.5%).

Conclusion

In this large study evaluating DRE patients whose disease does not meet the RegiSCAR criteria for DRESS, we found that additional factors outside the RegiSCAR criteria may help clinicians differentiate DRESS, which is critical for optimal and timely patient management. Our study also highlights the need for development of local protocols to ensure appropriate allergy labeling and testing are performed to prevent recurrent DRESS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将 DRESS 综合征与药疹和嗜酸性粒细胞增多症区分开来:超越 RegiSCAR 标准
背景诊断伴有嗜酸性粒细胞增多和全身症状的药物反应(DRESS)可能具有挑战性。目的我们试图确定严重皮肤不良反应登记处(RegiSCAR)标准之外的临床和实验室特征,以区分可能患有 DRESS(RegiSCAR ≥ 4)的患者和患有药疹和嗜酸性粒细胞增多(DRE)的患者。方法采用药物引起的发热、药物引起的全身皮肤糜烂和嗜酸性粒细胞增多的国际编码分类,对 2008 年至 2023 年的住院患者进行回顾性审计。除RegiSCAR外,DRESS的鉴别因素还包括症状出现前的服药潜伏期更长(中位数为21天 vs 5天,P < .001)和丙氨酸转氨酶水平更高(增加了2.49倍[95%置信区间为1.56, 4.00; P = .009])。随访(平均 5.67 年)结果显示,全州药物警报报告率(29.6%)和 DRESS 药物过敏检测率(20.5%)均较低。结论 在这项大型研究中,我们对疾病不符合 DRESS RegiSCAR 标准的 DRE 患者进行了评估,结果发现,RegiSCAR 标准之外的其他因素可能有助于临床医生区分 DRESS,这对于优化和及时处理患者至关重要。我们的研究还强调了制定本地方案的必要性,以确保进行适当的过敏标签和检测,防止 DRESS 复发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global
The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global Immunology, Allergology and Rheumatology
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
92 days
期刊最新文献
Eosinophil ETosis and Charcot-Leyden crystals in Kimura disease. Tezepelumab treatment in severe asthma with recurrent chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: Case series. Correspondence re: Long-term efficacy and safety of cow's milk anaphylaxis specific immunotherapy: Allergen unresponsiveness via the Tolerance Induction Program. Correspondence re: Randhawa et al, TIP's success in the treatment of cow's milk anaphylaxis leaves many questions unanswered. Reply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1