Pub Date : 2026-01-20DOI: 10.1016/j.jacig.2026.100648
Jun Jie Lim BSc , Zongxun Huang MS , Yu Qi Lee PhD , Mary Foong-Fong Chong PhD , Xueling Sim PhD , Mei Hui Liu PhD , Fook Tim Chew PhD
Background
Asthma is a chronic respiratory condition that poses significant public health challenges worldwide, including Singapore.
Objective
Associations between dietary intake and asthma outcomes were assessed in two independent cohorts: the Singapore/Malaysia Cross-Sectional Genetics Epidemiology Study (SMCGES; n = 12,172) and the Singapore Multi-Ethnic Cohort Phase 2 follow-up (MEC2_T2; n = 12,353).
Methods
Dietary intake was assessed using a 16-food-group food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) in SMCGES, and a validated 163-item population-specific FFQ in MEC2_T2. Asthma status was determined through self-reported physician diagnosis, with recent asthma attacks and inhaler requirements analyzed as clinically relevant phenotypes. Multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for demographic and lifestyle factors were applied with Bonferroni correction, and meta-analyses across 16 food groups were conducted to derive pooled effect estimates and assess between-cohort heterogeneity.
Results
Asthma prevalence was 19.7% in SMCGES and 9.83% in MEC2_T2. Among patients with asthma, 18.8% (SMCGES) and 18.7% (MEC2_T2) experienced recent asthma attacks, while inhaler requirement was lower in SMCGES (5.9%) than MEC2_T2 (18.4%). Fruit (pooled odds ratio [pOR] = 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57-0.74; P < .001) and nuts (pOR = 0.90; 95% CI, 0.85-0.95; P < .001) intake lowered the odds of asthma, while seafood intake increased the associated odds (pOR = 1.13; 95% CI, 1.07-1.20; P < .001). Fruit intake showed moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 63%; P = .10), with no heterogeneity for nuts (I2 = 0; P = .69) or seafood (I2 = 0, P = .56).
Conclusion
Pooled findings across two independent cohorts highlight specific food groups that may influence asthma outcomes.
哮喘是一种慢性呼吸系统疾病,在包括新加坡在内的世界范围内构成了重大的公共卫生挑战。目的通过新加坡/马来西亚横断面遗传流行病学研究(SMCGES, n = 12,172)和新加坡多种族队列2期随访(MEC2_T2, n = 12,353)两个独立队列评估饮食摄入与哮喘结局之间的关联。方法采用SMCGES的16种食物组食物频率问卷(FFQ)和MEC2_T2的163项人群特异性食物频率问卷(FFQ)对膳食摄入量进行评估。通过自我报告的医生诊断确定哮喘状态,并分析近期哮喘发作和吸入器需求作为临床相关表型。采用Bonferroni校正校正了人口统计学和生活方式因素的多变量logistic回归模型,并对16种食物组进行了荟萃分析,以得出汇总效应估计并评估队列间异质性。结果SMCGES组哮喘患病率为19.7%,MEC2_T2组为9.83%。在哮喘患者中,18.8% (SMCGES)和18.7% (MEC2_T2)最近经历过哮喘发作,而SMCGES(5.9%)的吸入器需求低于MEC2_T2(18.4%)。摄入水果(合并优势比[pOR] = 0.65; 95%可信区间[CI], 0.57-0.74; P < .001)和坚果(pOR = 0.90; 95% CI, 0.85-0.95; P < .001)降低了哮喘的患病几率,而摄入海鲜则增加了相关的患病几率(pOR = 1.13; 95% CI, 1.07-1.20; P < 001)。水果摄入量显示中等异质性(I2 = 63%; P = 0.10),坚果(I2 = 0; P = 0.69)或海鲜(I2 = 0, P = 0.56)没有异质性。结论:两个独立队列的综合研究结果强调了可能影响哮喘结局的特定食物组。
{"title":"Associations between dietary intake and asthma outcomes: Evidence from pooled analysis in two independent multiethnic Asian cohorts","authors":"Jun Jie Lim BSc , Zongxun Huang MS , Yu Qi Lee PhD , Mary Foong-Fong Chong PhD , Xueling Sim PhD , Mei Hui Liu PhD , Fook Tim Chew PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacig.2026.100648","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jacig.2026.100648","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Asthma is a chronic respiratory condition that poses significant public health challenges worldwide, including Singapore.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Associations between dietary intake and asthma outcomes were assessed in two independent cohorts: the Singapore/Malaysia Cross-Sectional Genetics Epidemiology Study (SMCGES; n = 12,172) and the Singapore Multi-Ethnic Cohort Phase 2 follow-up (MEC2_T2; n = 12,353).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Dietary intake was assessed using a 16-food-group food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) in SMCGES, and a validated 163-item population-specific FFQ in MEC2_T2. Asthma status was determined through self-reported physician diagnosis, with recent asthma attacks and inhaler requirements analyzed as clinically relevant phenotypes. Multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for demographic and lifestyle factors were applied with Bonferroni correction, and meta-analyses across 16 food groups were conducted to derive pooled effect estimates and assess between-cohort heterogeneity.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Asthma prevalence was 19.7% in SMCGES and 9.83% in MEC2_T2. Among patients with asthma, 18.8% (SMCGES) and 18.7% (MEC2_T2) experienced recent asthma attacks, while inhaler requirement was lower in SMCGES (5.9%) than MEC2_T2 (18.4%). Fruit (pooled odds ratio [pOR] = 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57-0.74; <em>P</em> < .001) and nuts (pOR = 0.90; 95% CI, 0.85-0.95; <em>P</em> < .001) intake lowered the odds of asthma, while seafood intake increased the associated odds (pOR = 1.13; 95% CI, 1.07-1.20; <em>P</em> < .001). Fruit intake showed moderate heterogeneity (<em>I</em><sup>2</sup> = 63%; <em>P</em> = .10), with no heterogeneity for nuts (<em>I</em><sup>2</sup> = 0; <em>P</em> = .69) or seafood (<em>I</em><sup>2</sup> = 0, <em>P</em> = .56).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Pooled findings across two independent cohorts highlight specific food groups that may influence asthma outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":75041,"journal":{"name":"The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global","volume":"5 2","pages":"Article 100648"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146078115","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-19DOI: 10.1016/j.jacig.2026.100645
Saiyara S. Shama MBBS , Ricardo J. Estrada-Mendizabal MD , Christine R.F. Rukasin MD , Bradford B. Smith MD , Gerald W. Volcheck MD , Alexei Gonzalez-Estrada MD
Background
Limited information exists regarding outcomes during repeat surgical procedures in patients with perioperative anaphylaxis (POA). Although current guidelines recommend that future procedures be guided by allergy evaluations, little is known about adherence to these recommendations or risk of recurrence.
Objective
Our aim was to assess the incidence of recurrent POA and evaluate adherence to allergist recommendations during subsequent anesthetic procedures.
Methods
We performed a retrospective review of 100 patients with POA across the Mayo Clinic Health System (2010-2021) to assess subsequent surgical procedures after allergy evaluation. Anesthetic records, allergy workup results, and allergist recommendations were reviewed.
Results
Of 100 patients, 53 underwent at least 1 subsequent anesthetic procedure (median 2, range 1-7), with 81 anesthetic records available. No recurrent POA events were observed. A causative agent was identified in 25 patients (47%) as follows: antibiotics (n = 14), neuromuscular blocking agents (n = 5), and other agents (n = 8). Of the 38 procedures with records in this group, allergist recommendations were fully followed in 29 (76%) and partially followed in 9 (24%). In patients without an identified culprit (n = 28), 49 procedures had records, with partial adherence noted in 12 cases (18%). Deviations often involved substitution or avoidance of neuromuscular blocking agents, even when not implicated.
Conclusion
Although no recurrence was observed, prospective studies are needed to determine whether adherence to allergist recommendations influences long-term outcomes, as well as to better understand documentation and communication practices.
{"title":"Anesthetic procedure outcomes after initial perioperative anaphylaxis: A retrospective multicenter US review","authors":"Saiyara S. Shama MBBS , Ricardo J. Estrada-Mendizabal MD , Christine R.F. Rukasin MD , Bradford B. Smith MD , Gerald W. Volcheck MD , Alexei Gonzalez-Estrada MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacig.2026.100645","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jacig.2026.100645","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Limited information exists regarding outcomes during repeat surgical procedures in patients with perioperative anaphylaxis (POA). Although current guidelines recommend that future procedures be guided by allergy evaluations, little is known about adherence to these recommendations or risk of recurrence.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Our aim was to assess the incidence of recurrent POA and evaluate adherence to allergist recommendations during subsequent anesthetic procedures.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a retrospective review of 100 patients with POA across the Mayo Clinic Health System (2010-2021) to assess subsequent surgical procedures after allergy evaluation. Anesthetic records, allergy workup results, and allergist recommendations were reviewed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 100 patients, 53 underwent at least 1 subsequent anesthetic procedure (median 2, range 1-7), with 81 anesthetic records available. No recurrent POA events were observed. A causative agent was identified in 25 patients (47%) as follows: antibiotics (n = 14), neuromuscular blocking agents (n = 5), and other agents (n = 8). Of the 38 procedures with records in this group, allergist recommendations were fully followed in 29 (76%) and partially followed in 9 (24%). In patients without an identified culprit (n = 28), 49 procedures had records, with partial adherence noted in 12 cases (18%). Deviations often involved substitution or avoidance of neuromuscular blocking agents, even when not implicated.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Although no recurrence was observed, prospective studies are needed to determine whether adherence to allergist recommendations influences long-term outcomes, as well as to better understand documentation and communication practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":75041,"journal":{"name":"The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global","volume":"5 2","pages":"Article 100645"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146078135","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-19DOI: 10.1016/j.jacig.2026.100644
Baojun Wu PhD , Mao Yang MS , Donglei Hu PhD , Samantha Hochstadt MS , Bo Hyun Lee PhD , David E. Lanfear MD, MS , Jonathan Witonsky MD, MAS , Paul Stemmer PhD , Esteban G. Burchard MD, MPH , Elad Ziv MD , L. Keoki Williams MD, MPH, MBA
Background
Non-Hispanic Black individuals are disproportionately affected by asthma and severe asthma exacerbations. To elucidate asthma pathogenesis, it is essential to understand the dysregulated gene expression patterns linked to asthma status.
Objective
We sought to characterize whole blood gene expression and molecular pathways associated with asthma progression in non-Hispanic Black individuals.
Methods
RNA sequencing was performed on whole blood samples from individuals enrolled in the Study of Asthma Phenotypes and Pharmacogenomic Interactions by Race-Ethnicity (SAPPHIRE). Participants were categorized into 4 groups based on their clinical status. We characterized transcriptomic signatures specific to distinct disease states: one reflecting asthma establishment and another representing disease exacerbation. From these, we identified candidate biological processes enriched during each transition that are particularly relevant to asthma. Additionally, we pinpointed key molecular drivers and screened for drugs targeting these critical genes.
Results
Compared with healthy control subjects, patients with controlled asthma showed upregulation of genes involved in intestinal IgA production, asthma-related pathways, and antigen processing and presentation. When compared with participants with uncontrolled asthma, individuals with an impending asthma exacerbation had upregulation of genes in pathways associated with Fcγ receptor–mediated phagocytosis, TH1/TH2 cell differentiation, and neutrophil extracellular trap formation. Using probabilistic causal analysis of these gene signatures, we identified IL6R, NUMB, and EMG1 as key driver genes in the time period preceding an asthma exacerbation. Our analysis revealed potential treatments to counteract these changes.
Conclusions
Blood gene expression profiling in non-Hispanic Black individuals revealed potential targets and preventive drug candidates for asthma exacerbations, providing new insights for the future treatments.
{"title":"Distinct blood transcriptomic profiling underlying asthma establishment and exacerbation","authors":"Baojun Wu PhD , Mao Yang MS , Donglei Hu PhD , Samantha Hochstadt MS , Bo Hyun Lee PhD , David E. Lanfear MD, MS , Jonathan Witonsky MD, MAS , Paul Stemmer PhD , Esteban G. Burchard MD, MPH , Elad Ziv MD , L. Keoki Williams MD, MPH, MBA","doi":"10.1016/j.jacig.2026.100644","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jacig.2026.100644","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Non-Hispanic Black individuals are disproportionately affected by asthma and severe asthma exacerbations. To elucidate asthma pathogenesis, it is essential to understand the dysregulated gene expression patterns linked to asthma status.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We sought to characterize whole blood gene expression and molecular pathways associated with asthma progression in non-Hispanic Black individuals.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>RNA sequencing was performed on whole blood samples from individuals enrolled in the Study of Asthma Phenotypes and Pharmacogenomic Interactions by Race-Ethnicity (SAPPHIRE). Participants were categorized into 4 groups based on their clinical status. We characterized transcriptomic signatures specific to distinct disease states: one reflecting asthma establishment and another representing disease exacerbation. From these, we identified candidate biological processes enriched during each transition that are particularly relevant to asthma. Additionally, we pinpointed key molecular drivers and screened for drugs targeting these critical genes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Compared with healthy control subjects, patients with controlled asthma showed upregulation of genes involved in intestinal IgA production, asthma-related pathways, and antigen processing and presentation. When compared with participants with uncontrolled asthma, individuals with an impending asthma exacerbation had upregulation of genes in pathways associated with Fcγ receptor–mediated phagocytosis, T<sub>H</sub>1/T<sub>H</sub>2 cell differentiation, and neutrophil extracellular trap formation. Using probabilistic causal analysis of these gene signatures, we identified <em>IL6R</em>, <em>NUMB</em>, and <em>EMG1</em> as key driver genes in the time period preceding an asthma exacerbation. Our analysis revealed potential treatments to counteract these changes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Blood gene expression profiling in non-Hispanic Black individuals revealed potential targets and preventive drug candidates for asthma exacerbations, providing new insights for the future treatments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":75041,"journal":{"name":"The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global","volume":"5 2","pages":"Article 100644"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146078114","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-12DOI: 10.1016/j.jacig.2026.100639
Freddy Gonzalez , Christina E. Ciaccio MD, MSc , Sharmilee M. Nyenhuis MD
Background
Individuals with allergic rhinitis and asthma rely on accurate pollen forecasts to avoid allergen exposure and manage symptoms. However, many widely used weather and health applications (apps) use manual pollen counting methods, which may vary in accuracy.
Objective
This study aimed to evaluate the concordance between popular pollen forecasting apps and real-time data collected from an automated pollen monitoring device at a single site in the Chicago area.
Methods
We compared daily pollen forecasts from 2 commonly used consumer apps (The Weather Channel app and the AccuWeather app) with pollen data recorded by the PollenSense automated monitoring device over 2 months. To assess daily concordance, forecasted pollen levels and automated counts were categorized as being in the low, moderate, or high ranges. Descriptive and inferential assessment of accuracy and reliability of consumer-facing pollen forecasts were performed.
Results
Across the study period, concordance between the consumer apps and the PollenSense counts was low (the forecast levels for the AccuWeather app were 7% for grass, 33% for ragweed, and 56% for mold, whereas those for The Weather Channel app were 29% for grass and 34.% for ragweed). No statistically significant association was found between the pollen forecasts and measured pollen levels.
Conclusion
The popular pollen forecasting apps demonstrated poor concordance with real-time automated pollen data. These findings highlight the limitations of current forecasting tools and underscore the need for improved, validated technologies to support clinical decision making and public health recommendations for individuals affected by pollen allergies.
{"title":"Evaluating the concordance of pollen forecasting apps against automated pollen monitoring: A single-site experience","authors":"Freddy Gonzalez , Christina E. Ciaccio MD, MSc , Sharmilee M. Nyenhuis MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacig.2026.100639","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jacig.2026.100639","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Individuals with allergic rhinitis and asthma rely on accurate pollen forecasts to avoid allergen exposure and manage symptoms. However, many widely used weather and health applications (apps) use manual pollen counting methods, which may vary in accuracy.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the concordance between popular pollen forecasting apps and real-time data collected from an automated pollen monitoring device at a single site in the Chicago area.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We compared daily pollen forecasts from 2 commonly used consumer apps (The Weather Channel app and the AccuWeather app) with pollen data recorded by the PollenSense automated monitoring device over 2 months. To assess daily concordance, forecasted pollen levels and automated counts were categorized as being in the low, moderate, or high ranges. Descriptive and inferential assessment of accuracy and reliability of consumer-facing pollen forecasts were performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Across the study period, concordance between the consumer apps and the PollenSense counts was low (the forecast levels for the AccuWeather app were 7% for grass, 33% for ragweed, and 56% for mold, whereas those for The Weather Channel app were 29% for grass and 34.% for ragweed). No statistically significant association was found between the pollen forecasts and measured pollen levels.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The popular pollen forecasting apps demonstrated poor concordance with real-time automated pollen data. These findings highlight the limitations of current forecasting tools and underscore the need for improved, validated technologies to support clinical decision making and public health recommendations for individuals affected by pollen allergies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":75041,"journal":{"name":"The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global","volume":"5 2","pages":"Article 100639"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145978482","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-12DOI: 10.1016/j.jacig.2026.100640
Jefferson Daniel MD, Sekar Rajasekar MBBS, Devasahayam Jesudas Christopher DNB, FRCP
This case report highlights the first documented instance of anaphylaxis caused by Withania coagulans, a natural remedy widely used in traditional medicine. Given the popularity of W coagulans among Asian communities worldwide, the report’s findings carry essential global clinical relevance.
{"title":"Anaphylaxis triggered by rennet flower (Withania coagulans): A cautionary tale from traditional medicine","authors":"Jefferson Daniel MD, Sekar Rajasekar MBBS, Devasahayam Jesudas Christopher DNB, FRCP","doi":"10.1016/j.jacig.2026.100640","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jacig.2026.100640","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This case report highlights the first documented instance of anaphylaxis caused by <em>Withania coagulans</em>, a natural remedy widely used in traditional medicine. Given the popularity of <em>W coagulans</em> among Asian communities worldwide, the report’s findings carry essential global clinical relevance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":75041,"journal":{"name":"The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global","volume":"5 2","pages":"Article 100640"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146037726","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-09DOI: 10.1016/j.jacig.2026.100643
Stephanie Jeong MD, Scott H. Sicherer MD
Background
Self-injectable epinephrine (SIE) is the first line of defense against anaphylaxis, a potentially life-threatening allergic reaction commonly triggered by food. Internal medicine residents play a crucial role in managing food allergy and anaphylaxis, but knowledge and comfort in doing so may vary.
Objective
The purpose of the study was to assess the efficacy of a brief educational intervention on improving internal residents’ preparedness to manage food allergies, specifically focusing on prescribing and counseling patients regarding SIE use.
Methods
A survey assessing residents’ understanding and comfort was administered, followed by a presentation of a brief educational module and subsequent completion of a postintervention survey.
Results
Thirty-four residents completed both the preintervention and postintervention surveys. Almost all participants reported improvement in their comfort levels for both prescribing and counseling patients on the use of SIE (P < .05). Pre-post knowledge improved from 83% to 97% (P = .02) regarding the correct location of epinephrine injection, and from 37% to 65% (P = .01) regarding appropriate scenarios for prescribing SIE. Ninety-four percent of participants rated the intervention as helpful.
Conclusions
A brief educational module for internal medicine residents showed strong efficacy and participant satisfaction.
{"title":"Improved food allergy and anaphylaxis knowledge and comfort among internal medicine residents following a brief educational intervention","authors":"Stephanie Jeong MD, Scott H. Sicherer MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacig.2026.100643","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jacig.2026.100643","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Self-injectable epinephrine (SIE) is the first line of defense against anaphylaxis, a potentially life-threatening allergic reaction commonly triggered by food. Internal medicine residents play a crucial role in managing food allergy and anaphylaxis, but knowledge and comfort in doing so may vary.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The purpose of the study was to assess the efficacy of a brief educational intervention on improving internal residents’ preparedness to manage food allergies, specifically focusing on prescribing and counseling patients regarding SIE use.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A survey assessing residents’ understanding and comfort was administered, followed by a presentation of a brief educational module and subsequent completion of a postintervention survey.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty-four residents completed both the preintervention and postintervention surveys. Almost all participants reported improvement in their comfort levels for both prescribing and counseling patients on the use of SIE (<em>P</em> < .05). Pre-post knowledge improved from 83% to 97% (<em>P</em> = .02) regarding the correct location of epinephrine injection, and from 37% to 65% (<em>P</em> = .01) regarding appropriate scenarios for prescribing SIE. Ninety-four percent of participants rated the intervention as helpful.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A brief educational module for internal medicine residents showed strong efficacy and participant satisfaction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":75041,"journal":{"name":"The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global","volume":"5 2","pages":"Article 100643"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146037731","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/S2772-8293(25)00233-4
{"title":"Aims and scope","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S2772-8293(25)00233-4","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2772-8293(25)00233-4","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":75041,"journal":{"name":"The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global","volume":"5 1","pages":"Article 100632"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145924083","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-22DOI: 10.1016/j.jacig.2025.100636
Anjali Nemorin MPH , Dylan T. Norton BA , Chloe V. Green MURP , Michelle S. Jerry BS , Alysse G. Wurcel MD, MS , Kimberly G. Blumenthal MD, MSc
Background
Vaccines are an evidence-based intervention that mitigates the impact of infections, yet many Americans indicate hesitancy toward receiving vaccines. One of the most common reasons for this is the potential for experiencing adverse reactions when receiving vaccines. The current literature shows that clinical decision support (CDS) tools have been utilized to improve vaccine coverage.
Objective
Our aim was to assess specialist physician experiences, practices, and levels of comfort with evaluating adverse and allergic reactions to vaccines, as well as with addressing secondary vaccine hesitancy, using CDS tools.
Methods
Researchers conducted 10 semistructured interviews with physicians in Mass General Brigham’s Infectious Diseases and Allergy/Immunology units. The interview guide consisted of 11 questions divided into 4 sections: vaccine conversations, vaccine allergies/reactions, CDS, and structural facilitators/barriers. The interview responses were evaluated by using rapid thematic analysis.
Results
Specialist physicians were generally comfortable talking to patients about vaccine hesitancy but were also open to CDS tools that effectively and efficiently contribute to improved conversations around secondary vaccine hesitancy to increase vaccine uptake. Desired CDS tool features include sharing educational visuals and videos with patients. The risks involve operational delays and lack of real-time data and accountability structures. Clinic modifications such as longer appointment times or group appointments were considered as other ways to help address vaccine hesitancy.
Conclusion
Specialist physicians expressed interest in using CDS tools to improve vaccine-related conversations with their patients. Future CDS tools must account for timely vaccine information and workflow efficiency issues. Future research should include generalist physicians, other health care team members, and patients.
{"title":"Specialist physician perspectives on clinical decision support to address secondary vaccine hesitancy","authors":"Anjali Nemorin MPH , Dylan T. Norton BA , Chloe V. Green MURP , Michelle S. Jerry BS , Alysse G. Wurcel MD, MS , Kimberly G. Blumenthal MD, MSc","doi":"10.1016/j.jacig.2025.100636","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jacig.2025.100636","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Vaccines are an evidence-based intervention that mitigates the impact of infections, yet many Americans indicate hesitancy toward receiving vaccines. One of the most common reasons for this is the potential for experiencing adverse reactions when receiving vaccines. The current literature shows that clinical decision support (CDS) tools have been utilized to improve vaccine coverage.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Our aim was to assess specialist physician experiences, practices, and levels of comfort with evaluating adverse and allergic reactions to vaccines, as well as with addressing secondary vaccine hesitancy, using CDS tools.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Researchers conducted 10 semistructured interviews with physicians in Mass General Brigham’s Infectious Diseases and Allergy/Immunology units. The interview guide consisted of 11 questions divided into 4 sections: vaccine conversations, vaccine allergies/reactions, CDS, and structural facilitators/barriers. The interview responses were evaluated by using rapid thematic analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Specialist physicians were generally comfortable talking to patients about vaccine hesitancy but were also open to CDS tools that effectively and efficiently contribute to improved conversations around secondary vaccine hesitancy to increase vaccine uptake. Desired CDS tool features include sharing educational visuals and videos with patients. The risks involve operational delays and lack of real-time data and accountability structures. Clinic modifications such as longer appointment times or group appointments were considered as other ways to help address vaccine hesitancy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Specialist physicians expressed interest in using CDS tools to improve vaccine-related conversations with their patients. Future CDS tools must account for timely vaccine information and workflow efficiency issues. Future research should include generalist physicians, other health care team members, and patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":75041,"journal":{"name":"The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global","volume":"5 2","pages":"Article 100636"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145926973","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-22DOI: 10.1016/j.jacig.2025.100637
Aaron Chin MD , Ali Doroudchi MD , Derek C. Pham BS , Nicholas J. Jackson PhD, MPH , Maria I. Garcia-Lloret MD
Background
Allergic reactions to food are a leading cause of pediatric emergency room (ER) visits. National guidelines now recommend early introduction of allergenic foods; however, whether these changes have affected ER encounters remains poorly understood.
Objective
Our aim was to observe trends in ER encounters for food-induced reactions (FIRs), including food-induced anaphylaxis (FIA), among children aged 0 to 5 years between 2013 and 2024.
Methods
We performed a retrospective analysis of ER visits at the University of California Los Angeles from 2013 to 2024. FIRs were identified by using International Classification of Diseases codes and stratified by age (0-1 vs 2-5 years). Logistic regression assessed annual trends. Multivariate logistic regression was used to compare postguideline years (2022-2024) with preguideline years (2013-2016), adjusting for clinical and demographic variables.
Results
Of 67,059 ER visits, 350 FIRs and 182 FIA visits were identified. FIR and FIA annual rates increased significantly over time in infants aged 0 to 1 years (odds ratio [OR] = 1.15 [P = .005] and OR = 1.27 [P = .002]). In children aged 2 to 5 years old, neither FIR nor FIA rates increased. Refractory anaphylactic reactions did not change in either group. In multivariate analysis, infants in the postguideline period had more than twice the odds of a FIR during the preguideline years (OR = 2.21 [95% CI = 1.37-3.55]), whereas no change was observed in the 2- to 5-year age group (OR = 0.82 [95% CI = 0.55-1.2]).
Conclusion
ER visits for food reactions have continued to rise at a steady rate over time among infants. These findings underscore the need for additional research on adoption, parental guidance, and long-term impact of early allergen introduction.
{"title":"Rising trends in infant ER encounters for food-induced allergic reactions in the era of early allergenic food introduction","authors":"Aaron Chin MD , Ali Doroudchi MD , Derek C. Pham BS , Nicholas J. Jackson PhD, MPH , Maria I. Garcia-Lloret MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacig.2025.100637","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jacig.2025.100637","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Allergic reactions to food are a leading cause of pediatric emergency room (ER) visits. National guidelines now recommend early introduction of allergenic foods; however, whether these changes have affected ER encounters remains poorly understood.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Our aim was to observe trends in ER encounters for food-induced reactions (FIRs), including food-induced anaphylaxis (FIA), among children aged 0 to 5 years between 2013 and 2024.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a retrospective analysis of ER visits at the University of California Los Angeles from 2013 to 2024. FIRs were identified by using International Classification of Diseases codes and stratified by age (0-1 vs 2-5 years). Logistic regression assessed annual trends. Multivariate logistic regression was used to compare postguideline years (2022-2024) with preguideline years (2013-2016), adjusting for clinical and demographic variables.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 67,059 ER visits, 350 FIRs and 182 FIA visits were identified. FIR and FIA annual rates increased significantly over time in infants aged 0 to 1 years (odds ratio [OR] = 1.15 [<em>P</em> = .005] and OR = 1.27 [<em>P</em> = .002]). In children aged 2 to 5 years old, neither FIR nor FIA rates increased. Refractory anaphylactic reactions did not change in either group. In multivariate analysis, infants in the postguideline period had more than twice the odds of a FIR during the preguideline years (OR = 2.21 [95% CI = 1.37-3.55]), whereas no change was observed in the 2- to 5-year age group (OR = 0.82 [95% CI = 0.55-1.2]).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ER visits for food reactions have continued to rise at a steady rate over time among infants. These findings underscore the need for additional research on adoption, parental guidance, and long-term impact of early allergen introduction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":75041,"journal":{"name":"The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global","volume":"5 2","pages":"Article 100637"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145884883","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Food protein–induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) caused by egg yolk is increasingly recognized in Japan, yet the optimal timing for oral food challenge (OFC) and the process of tolerance acquisition remain unclear.
Objective
Our aim was to investigate the clinical outcomes of early OFC (performed 90-120 days after the last symptomatic episode) in children with egg yolk–induced FPIES, with a focus on identifying a potential transitional tolerance phase.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective analysis of a case series of 3 patients with egg yolk–induced FPIES who underwent early OFC. Subsequent ingestion outcomes and clinical symptoms were analyzed.
Results
All 3 patients had negative OFC results but experienced mild gastrointestinal symptoms such as persistent diarrhea or recurrent vomiting during repeated ingestion at home. These features suggested a transitional tolerance phase. Full tolerance was achieved within 6 to 7 months in all cases.
Conclusion
Early OFC may be conducted at a time that is suboptimal for reliable confirmation of tolerance. A negative OFC result does not necessarily indicate acquisition of full tolerance. Clinicians should be aware of a transitional phase during which symptoms may recur despite initial OFC success. Continued ingestion and close monitoring are essential to confirm full tolerance.
{"title":"Potential for gradual tolerance acquisition in egg yolk–induced FPIES: A case series","authors":"Tomoaki Kunitsu MD , Kana Hamanaka MD , Midori Tagaya MD , Kazuo Nonomura MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacig.2025.100635","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jacig.2025.100635","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Food protein–induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) caused by egg yolk is increasingly recognized in Japan, yet the optimal timing for oral food challenge (OFC) and the process of tolerance acquisition remain unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Our aim was to investigate the clinical outcomes of early OFC (performed 90-120 days after the last symptomatic episode) in children with egg yolk–induced FPIES, with a focus on identifying a potential transitional tolerance phase.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective analysis of a case series of 3 patients with egg yolk–induced FPIES who underwent early OFC. Subsequent ingestion outcomes and clinical symptoms were analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All 3 patients had negative OFC results but experienced mild gastrointestinal symptoms such as persistent diarrhea or recurrent vomiting during repeated ingestion at home. These features suggested a transitional tolerance phase. Full tolerance was achieved within 6 to 7 months in all cases.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Early OFC may be conducted at a time that is suboptimal for reliable confirmation of tolerance. A negative OFC result does not necessarily indicate acquisition of full tolerance. Clinicians should be aware of a transitional phase during which symptoms may recur despite initial OFC success. Continued ingestion and close monitoring are essential to confirm full tolerance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":75041,"journal":{"name":"The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global","volume":"5 2","pages":"Article 100635"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145926974","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}