State-level structural sexism and adolescent sexual violence victimization in the US

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES Child Abuse & Neglect Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.107096
Heeyoung Lee
{"title":"State-level structural sexism and adolescent sexual violence victimization in the US","authors":"Heeyoung Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.107096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Adolescent sexual violence victimization is a significant public health issue in the United States. Structural sexism, a form of gender inequality at the societal level, may play a crucial role in influencing the prevalence of sexual violence victimization among adolescents.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aims to examine the association between state-level structural sexism and sexual violence victimization among adolescents and to explore how this relationship varies between male and female adolescents.</div></div><div><h3>Participants and setting</h3><div>Data was derived from a nationally representative sample of high school students in grades 9–12 across the United States who participated in the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBS) in 2017 and 2019.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A state-level structural sexism index was created from nine different items to reflect the multidimensional nature of structural sexism. This study employs multi-level regression analysis to investigate the impact of state-level structural sexism on three types of sexual violence victimization: sexual violence, sexual dating violence, and physical dating violence.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This study revealed a significant interaction between structural sexism and gender. In states with higher levels of structural sexism, female adolescents reported increased likelihood of sexual violence (β = 0.013, <em>p</em> &lt; .001), sexual dating violence (β = 0.006, <em>p</em> &lt; .001), and physical dating violence (β = 0.006, p &lt; .001) compared to males. Conversely, male adolescents in these states reported lower rates of victimization.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The results underscore the role of structural sexism in influencing sexual violence victimization among adolescents. Addressing structural sexism may be essential in mitigating the risk of sexual violence victimization, especially for female adolescents.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51343,"journal":{"name":"Child Abuse & Neglect","volume":"158 ","pages":"Article 107096"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Abuse & Neglect","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0145213424004861","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Adolescent sexual violence victimization is a significant public health issue in the United States. Structural sexism, a form of gender inequality at the societal level, may play a crucial role in influencing the prevalence of sexual violence victimization among adolescents.

Objective

This study aims to examine the association between state-level structural sexism and sexual violence victimization among adolescents and to explore how this relationship varies between male and female adolescents.

Participants and setting

Data was derived from a nationally representative sample of high school students in grades 9–12 across the United States who participated in the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBS) in 2017 and 2019.

Methods

A state-level structural sexism index was created from nine different items to reflect the multidimensional nature of structural sexism. This study employs multi-level regression analysis to investigate the impact of state-level structural sexism on three types of sexual violence victimization: sexual violence, sexual dating violence, and physical dating violence.

Results

This study revealed a significant interaction between structural sexism and gender. In states with higher levels of structural sexism, female adolescents reported increased likelihood of sexual violence (β = 0.013, p < .001), sexual dating violence (β = 0.006, p < .001), and physical dating violence (β = 0.006, p < .001) compared to males. Conversely, male adolescents in these states reported lower rates of victimization.

Conclusions

The results underscore the role of structural sexism in influencing sexual violence victimization among adolescents. Addressing structural sexism may be essential in mitigating the risk of sexual violence victimization, especially for female adolescents.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国州级结构性性别歧视与青少年性暴力受害情况
背景青少年性暴力受害是美国的一个重要公共卫生问题。结构性性别歧视是一种社会层面上的性别不平等,它可能在影响青少年性暴力受害率方面发挥着至关重要的作用。本研究旨在考察州级结构性性别歧视与青少年性暴力受害率之间的关系,并探讨这种关系在男性青少年和女性青少年之间有何不同。参与者和背景数据来源于2017年和2019年参加青少年危险行为监测系统(YRBS)的美国9-12年级高中生的全国代表性样本。方法从9个不同的项目中创建了一个州级结构性性别歧视指数,以反映结构性性别歧视的多维性。本研究采用多层次回归分析,调查州级结构性性别歧视对性暴力、性约会暴力和肢体约会暴力这三种性暴力受害情况的影响。在结构性性别歧视程度较高的州,与男性相比,女性青少年遭受性暴力(β = 0.013,p < .001)、性约会暴力(β = 0.006,p < .001)和身体约会暴力(β = 0.006,p < .001)的可能性更大。相反,这些州的男性青少年报告的受害率较低。解决结构性性别歧视问题可能对降低性暴力受害风险至关重要,尤其是对女性青少年而言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
10.40%
发文量
397
期刊介绍: Official Publication of the International Society for Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect. Child Abuse & Neglect The International Journal, provides an international, multidisciplinary forum on all aspects of child abuse and neglect, with special emphasis on prevention and treatment; the scope extends further to all those aspects of life which either favor or hinder child development. While contributions will primarily be from the fields of psychology, psychiatry, social work, medicine, nursing, law enforcement, legislature, education, and anthropology, the Journal encourages the concerned lay individual and child-oriented advocate organizations to contribute.
期刊最新文献
Intracranial findings associated with low odds of retinal hemorrhage among children under 2 years of age at a single pediatric trauma center. Exposure to family violence and school violence among Palestinian high schoolers: The moderating effect of gender and school climate. Children exposed to sibling sexual abuse: Sociodemographic and trauma symptom differences. Attachment & biobehavioral catch-up participation & reunification in a family treatment court. How youth of color with mental disabilities are excluded from school: A DisCrit and logistic regression analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1