Simulated haemodynamic parameters and different infusion set-up affect drug delivery during syringe pump change over: A bench-top study in a laboratory setting

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING Intensive and Critical Care Nursing Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI:10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103861
Alberto Lucchini , Stefano Elli , Alessia Burgazzi , Laura Malvestuto Grilli , Claudia Pes , Katia Ferrari , Letizia Fumagalli , Chiara Fiorillo , Marco Giani , Emanuele Rezoagli
{"title":"Simulated haemodynamic parameters and different infusion set-up affect drug delivery during syringe pump change over: A bench-top study in a laboratory setting","authors":"Alberto Lucchini ,&nbsp;Stefano Elli ,&nbsp;Alessia Burgazzi ,&nbsp;Laura Malvestuto Grilli ,&nbsp;Claudia Pes ,&nbsp;Katia Ferrari ,&nbsp;Letizia Fumagalli ,&nbsp;Chiara Fiorillo ,&nbsp;Marco Giani ,&nbsp;Emanuele Rezoagli","doi":"10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Infusion therapy is widely used in clinical settings, particularly in intensive care units.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>to explore the influence of simulated cardiac output on “bolus” or “backflow” events that can occur during syringe pump changeover, considering several factors that have been previously outlined in published research. Syringe infusion pumps are commonly used for precise continuous intravenous drug delivery. Syringe pump changeover can be a challenging procedure.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Bench-top study in a laboratory setting. An extracorporeal circuit was used to simulate a cardiac output of 5 l/min. The following variables were used: three levels of vertical position of the syringe pump (−50 cm, 0, +50 cm), three levels of Central Venous Pressure (−5, 10, and 15 mmHg), presence/absence of carrier infusion (5 ml/h), and presence/absence of a needle-free connector between the syringe and extension line.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 108 syringe pump changes were performed with different combinations of the investigated variables. The mean time for syringe pump changeover was equal to 9.48 ± 2.45 s and the overall fluid displacement was 8 ± 40 µL (microlitres) (range, −262–156 µL). The CVP level and vertical position of the pump always statistically affected the overall displacement during syringe pump changeover. When a second infusion with an equal velocity rate to that of a syringe pump infusion is present in the same lumen, the presence of a needle-free device reduces the overall volume of displacement.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Syringe pump changeover can be a critical moment for patients when vasoactive drugs are administered.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for clinical practice</h3><div>In a simulated environment with a cardiac output of 5 L/min, the CVP level and vertical position of the syringe pump generated bolus or backflow events during the syringe pump changeover. The application of carrier infusion appeared to intensify these phenomena. Employing a neutral, needle-free system can potentially aid in reducing the development of boluses or backflows.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51322,"journal":{"name":"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 103861"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964339724002465","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Infusion therapy is widely used in clinical settings, particularly in intensive care units.

Aim

to explore the influence of simulated cardiac output on “bolus” or “backflow” events that can occur during syringe pump changeover, considering several factors that have been previously outlined in published research. Syringe infusion pumps are commonly used for precise continuous intravenous drug delivery. Syringe pump changeover can be a challenging procedure.

Methods

Bench-top study in a laboratory setting. An extracorporeal circuit was used to simulate a cardiac output of 5 l/min. The following variables were used: three levels of vertical position of the syringe pump (−50 cm, 0, +50 cm), three levels of Central Venous Pressure (−5, 10, and 15 mmHg), presence/absence of carrier infusion (5 ml/h), and presence/absence of a needle-free connector between the syringe and extension line.

Results

A total of 108 syringe pump changes were performed with different combinations of the investigated variables. The mean time for syringe pump changeover was equal to 9.48 ± 2.45 s and the overall fluid displacement was 8 ± 40 µL (microlitres) (range, −262–156 µL). The CVP level and vertical position of the pump always statistically affected the overall displacement during syringe pump changeover. When a second infusion with an equal velocity rate to that of a syringe pump infusion is present in the same lumen, the presence of a needle-free device reduces the overall volume of displacement.

Conclusions

Syringe pump changeover can be a critical moment for patients when vasoactive drugs are administered.

Implications for clinical practice

In a simulated environment with a cardiac output of 5 L/min, the CVP level and vertical position of the syringe pump generated bolus or backflow events during the syringe pump changeover. The application of carrier infusion appeared to intensify these phenomena. Employing a neutral, needle-free system can potentially aid in reducing the development of boluses or backflows.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模拟血流动力学参数和不同的输液设置会影响注射泵切换时的药物输送:实验室环境下的台式研究
背景输液治疗广泛应用于临床环境,尤其是重症监护病房。目的探讨模拟心输出量对注射泵转换过程中可能发生的 "栓剂 "或 "回流 "事件的影响,同时考虑之前发表的研究中概述的几个因素。注射器输液泵通常用于精确连续的静脉给药。注射泵的更换可能是一个具有挑战性的过程。使用体外循环模拟 5 升/分钟的心输出量。使用了以下变量:注射泵的三个垂直位置(-50 厘米、0、+50 厘米)、三个中心静脉压(-5、10 和 15 毫米汞柱)、有无载体输注(5 毫升/小时)以及注射器和延长管之间有无无针连接器。注射泵切换的平均时间为 9.48±2.45 秒,总液体排量为 8 ± 40 µL(微升)(范围为 -262-156 µL)。在注射泵转换过程中,CVP 水平和泵的垂直位置始终对总排量有统计学影响。在心输出量为 5 升/分钟的模拟环境中,CVP 水平和注射泵的垂直位置会在注射泵转换期间产生栓塞或回流事件。应用载体输注似乎会加剧这些现象。采用中性无针系统可能有助于减少栓塞或回流的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
15.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: The aims of Intensive and Critical Care Nursing are to promote excellence of care of critically ill patients by specialist nurses and their professional colleagues; to provide an international and interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and exchange of research findings, experience and ideas; to develop and enhance the knowledge, skills, attitudes and creative thinking essential to good critical care nursing practice. The journal publishes reviews, updates and feature articles in addition to original papers and significant preliminary communications. Articles may deal with any part of practice including relevant clinical, research, educational, psychological and technological aspects.
期刊最新文献
The ongoing challenge: ICU and beyond − managing nursing workload Sustainability in ICU: Less plastic, greener future – Response to Lucchini et al. Obesity paradox of sepsis in long-term outcome: The differential effect of body composition Corrigendum to “Music as healing in ICU survivors: The road ahead in seeking the right tone” [Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 86 (2025) 103828] Challenges perceived by pediatric intensive care unit nurses in caring for maltreated children and adolescents: A qualitative phenomenological study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1