Enhancing soybean yield stability and soil health through long-term mulching strategies: Insights from a 13-year study

IF 4.5 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY European Journal of Agronomy Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI:10.1016/j.eja.2024.127383
Jiajie Song , Dingding Zhang , Chenyu Wang , Jianheng Song , Shahzad Haider , Sen Chang , Xiaolong Shi , Jinze Bai , Jiaqi Hao , Gaihe Yang , Guangxin Ren , Yongzhong Feng , Xing Wang
{"title":"Enhancing soybean yield stability and soil health through long-term mulching strategies: Insights from a 13-year study","authors":"Jiajie Song ,&nbsp;Dingding Zhang ,&nbsp;Chenyu Wang ,&nbsp;Jianheng Song ,&nbsp;Shahzad Haider ,&nbsp;Sen Chang ,&nbsp;Xiaolong Shi ,&nbsp;Jinze Bai ,&nbsp;Jiaqi Hao ,&nbsp;Gaihe Yang ,&nbsp;Guangxin Ren ,&nbsp;Yongzhong Feng ,&nbsp;Xing Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.eja.2024.127383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sustainable agriculture systems incorporate important stabilizing mechanisms, such as mulching, for increasing yield and improving soil health. However, the synergistic effects of different long-term mulching practices on soybean yield stability and soil health remain unexplored. In this study, we conducted a 13-year long-term investigation to evaluate the impacts of various mulching methods—no mulching (CK), straw mulching (SM), plastic mulching (PM), and ridged and plastic mulching (RM)—over a 13-year period on soil nutrients, and soybean yield, stability, and sustainability. Our findings revealed that SM, PM, and RM treatments significantly increased the average yields by 28.02 %, 20.49 %, and 51.56 %, respectively. Moreover, SM and RM treatments significantly enhanced yield stability (SM +107.90 %, RM +98.82 %) and sustainability (SM +47.85 %, RM +37.14 %). Additionally, compared to CK, the SM treatment significantly increased the average soil organic carbon (SOC) and total nitrogen (STN) content by 16.78 % and 16.23 %, respectively. Meanwhile, mulching practices also improved soil reactive carbon and nitrogen pools. Compared to CK, plastic mulch reduced microbial biomass carbon (MBC) content (PM −8.85 %, RM −0.73 %) and soil ammonium nitrogen (AN) content (PM −8.19 %, RM −1.20 %), while increasing microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN) content (PM +8.73 %, RM +9.47 %). The SM treatment increased MBC, AN, and MBN contents by 0.24 %, 7.23 %, and 8.94 %, respectively. Additionally, SM and RM treatments significantly increased β-1,4-glucosidase (BG) activity (SM +98.74 %, RM +128.25 %) and decreased and β-1,4- n -acetamido-glucosidase (NAG) + 1-leucine aminopeptidase (LAP) (NAG + LAP) activity (SM −28.74 %, RM −25.33 %) compared to CK. Furthermore, SM, PM, and RM treatments significantly increased the Chao1 index by 35.30 %, 68.08 %, and 52.23 %, respectively, compared to CK. Finally, results of the Mantel test and random forest model indicated that the increases in yield and stability were due to improved soil temperature (ST), active carbon and nitrogen pools, enzyme activity, and diazotrophic bacterial diversity. In summary, our findings suggest that ridged and plastic mulching enhances soil nutrient effectiveness by maintaining soil moisture and regulating diazotrophic bacterial community structure, thereby increasing soybean yields. Conversely, straw mulching continuously supplies nutrients to the soil, enhancing soil quality and diazotrophic bacterial community structure, thus improving yield stability. Over all, our findings provides new insights into global long-term agricultural sustainability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51045,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Agronomy","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 127383"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Agronomy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1161030124003046","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sustainable agriculture systems incorporate important stabilizing mechanisms, such as mulching, for increasing yield and improving soil health. However, the synergistic effects of different long-term mulching practices on soybean yield stability and soil health remain unexplored. In this study, we conducted a 13-year long-term investigation to evaluate the impacts of various mulching methods—no mulching (CK), straw mulching (SM), plastic mulching (PM), and ridged and plastic mulching (RM)—over a 13-year period on soil nutrients, and soybean yield, stability, and sustainability. Our findings revealed that SM, PM, and RM treatments significantly increased the average yields by 28.02 %, 20.49 %, and 51.56 %, respectively. Moreover, SM and RM treatments significantly enhanced yield stability (SM +107.90 %, RM +98.82 %) and sustainability (SM +47.85 %, RM +37.14 %). Additionally, compared to CK, the SM treatment significantly increased the average soil organic carbon (SOC) and total nitrogen (STN) content by 16.78 % and 16.23 %, respectively. Meanwhile, mulching practices also improved soil reactive carbon and nitrogen pools. Compared to CK, plastic mulch reduced microbial biomass carbon (MBC) content (PM −8.85 %, RM −0.73 %) and soil ammonium nitrogen (AN) content (PM −8.19 %, RM −1.20 %), while increasing microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN) content (PM +8.73 %, RM +9.47 %). The SM treatment increased MBC, AN, and MBN contents by 0.24 %, 7.23 %, and 8.94 %, respectively. Additionally, SM and RM treatments significantly increased β-1,4-glucosidase (BG) activity (SM +98.74 %, RM +128.25 %) and decreased and β-1,4- n -acetamido-glucosidase (NAG) + 1-leucine aminopeptidase (LAP) (NAG + LAP) activity (SM −28.74 %, RM −25.33 %) compared to CK. Furthermore, SM, PM, and RM treatments significantly increased the Chao1 index by 35.30 %, 68.08 %, and 52.23 %, respectively, compared to CK. Finally, results of the Mantel test and random forest model indicated that the increases in yield and stability were due to improved soil temperature (ST), active carbon and nitrogen pools, enzyme activity, and diazotrophic bacterial diversity. In summary, our findings suggest that ridged and plastic mulching enhances soil nutrient effectiveness by maintaining soil moisture and regulating diazotrophic bacterial community structure, thereby increasing soybean yields. Conversely, straw mulching continuously supplies nutrients to the soil, enhancing soil quality and diazotrophic bacterial community structure, thus improving yield stability. Over all, our findings provides new insights into global long-term agricultural sustainability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过长期覆盖策略提高大豆产量稳定性和土壤健康:13 年研究的启示
可持续农业系统采用了地膜覆盖等重要的稳定机制,以提高产量和改善土壤健康。然而,不同的长期地膜覆盖方法对大豆产量稳定性和土壤健康的协同效应仍有待探索。在本研究中,我们进行了一项为期 13 年的长期调查,以评估各种地膜覆盖方法--无地膜覆盖(CK)、秸秆地膜覆盖(SM)、塑料地膜覆盖(PM)以及脊状塑料地膜覆盖(RM)--对土壤养分以及大豆产量、稳定性和可持续性的影响。我们的研究结果表明,SM、PM 和 RM 处理分别显著提高了平均产量 28.02%、20.49% 和 51.56%。此外,SM 和 RM 处理显著提高了产量稳定性(SM +107.90 %,RM +98.82 %)和可持续性(SM +47.85 %,RM +37.14 %)。此外,与 CK 相比,SM 处理使土壤有机碳(SOC)和全氮(STN)的平均含量分别提高了 16.78 % 和 16.23 %。同时,地膜覆盖也改善了土壤活性碳和氮库。与 CK 相比,塑料地膜覆盖降低了微生物生物量碳(MBC)含量(PM -8.85 %,RM -0.73 %)和土壤铵态氮(AN)含量(PM -8.19 %,RM -1.20 %),同时增加了微生物生物量氮(MBN)含量(PM +8.73 %,RM +9.47 %)。SM 处理使 MBC、AN 和 MBN 含量分别增加了 0.24 %、7.23 % 和 8.94 %。此外,与 CK 相比,SM 和 RM 处理显著提高了β-1,4-葡萄糖苷酶(BG)活性(SM +98.74 %,RM +128.25 %),降低了β-1,4-正乙酰氨基葡萄糖苷酶(NAG)+ 1-亮氨酸氨基肽酶(LAP)(NAG + LAP)活性(SM -28.74 %,RM -25.33 %)。此外,与 CK 相比,SM、PM 和 RM 处理分别使 Chao1 指数显著增加了 35.30 %、68.08 % 和 52.23 %。最后,曼特尔检验和随机森林模型的结果表明,产量和稳定性的提高归因于土壤温度(ST)、活性碳氮库、酶活性和重氮细菌多样性的改善。总之,我们的研究结果表明,脊状覆盖物和塑料覆盖物可通过保持土壤水分和调节重氮细菌群落结构来提高土壤养分的有效性,从而增加大豆产量。相反,秸秆覆盖可持续为土壤提供养分,提高土壤质量和重氮细菌群落结构,从而提高产量稳定性。总之,我们的研究结果为全球农业的长期可持续性提供了新的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Agronomy
European Journal of Agronomy 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Agronomy, the official journal of the European Society for Agronomy, publishes original research papers reporting experimental and theoretical contributions to field-based agronomy and crop science. The journal will consider research at the field level for agricultural, horticultural and tree crops, that uses comprehensive and explanatory approaches. The EJA covers the following topics: crop physiology crop production and management including irrigation, fertilization and soil management agroclimatology and modelling plant-soil relationships crop quality and post-harvest physiology farming and cropping systems agroecosystems and the environment crop-weed interactions and management organic farming horticultural crops papers from the European Society for Agronomy bi-annual meetings In determining the suitability of submitted articles for publication, particular scrutiny is placed on the degree of novelty and significance of the research and the extent to which it adds to existing knowledge in agronomy.
期刊最新文献
The nitrogen supply capacity and application methods of straw-chemical mixed fertilizer in the sweet corn variety ‘Zhetian 19’ Simultaneous canola windrowing and herbicide treatment improve the production of sequenced winter wheat Risk-return trade-offs in diversified cropping systems under conservation agriculture: Evidence from a 14-year long-term field experiment in north-western India New insights to understand the influence of hairy vetch on maize yield and its response to nitrogen application Ex-ante analyses using machine learning to understand the interactive influences of environmental and agro-management variables for target-oriented management practice selection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1