Megastudy testing 25 treatments to reduce antidemocratic attitudes and partisan animosity

IF 44.7 1区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Science Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1126/science.adh4764
Jan G. Voelkel, Michael N. Stagnaro, James Y. Chu, Sophia L. Pink, Joseph S. Mernyk, Chrystal Redekopp, Isaias Ghezae, Matthew Cashman, Dhaval Adjodah, Levi G. Allen, L. Victor Allis, Gina Baleria, Nathan Ballantyne, Jay J. Van Bavel, Hayley Blunden, Alia Braley, Christopher J. Bryan, Jared B. Celniker, Mina Cikara, Margarett V. Clapper, Katherine Clayton, Hanne Collins, Evan DeFilippis, Macrina Dieffenbach, Kimberly C. Doell, Charles Dorison, Mylien Duong, Peter Felsman, Maya Fiorella, David Francis, Michael Franz, Roman A. Gallardo, Sara Gifford, Daniela Goya-Tocchetto, Kurt Gray, Joe Green, Joshua Greene, Mertcan Güngör, Matthew Hall, Cameron A. Hecht, Ali Javeed, John T. Jost, Aaron C. Kay, Nick R. Kay, Brandyn Keating, John Michael Kelly, James R. G. Kirk, Malka Kopell, Nour Kteily, Emily Kubin, Jeffrey Lees, Gabriel Lenz, Matthew Levendusky, Rebecca Littman, Kara Luo, Aaron Lyles, Ben Lyons, Wayde Marsh, James Martherus, Lauren Alpert Maurer, Caroline Mehl, Julia Minson, Molly Moore, Samantha L. Moore-Berg, Michael H. Pasek, Alex Pentland, Curtis Puryear, Hossein Rahnama, Steve Rathje, Jay Rosato, Maytal Saar-Tsechansky, Luiza Almeida Santos, Colleen M. Seifert, Azim Shariff, Otto Simonsson, Shiri Spitz Siddiqi, Daniel F. Stone, Palma Strand, Michael Tomz, David S. Yeager, Erez Yoeli, Jamil Zaki, James N. Druckman, David G. Rand, Robb Willer
{"title":"Megastudy testing 25 treatments to reduce antidemocratic attitudes and partisan animosity","authors":"Jan G. Voelkel,&nbsp;Michael N. Stagnaro,&nbsp;James Y. Chu,&nbsp;Sophia L. Pink,&nbsp;Joseph S. Mernyk,&nbsp;Chrystal Redekopp,&nbsp;Isaias Ghezae,&nbsp;Matthew Cashman,&nbsp;Dhaval Adjodah,&nbsp;Levi G. Allen,&nbsp;L. Victor Allis,&nbsp;Gina Baleria,&nbsp;Nathan Ballantyne,&nbsp;Jay J. Van Bavel,&nbsp;Hayley Blunden,&nbsp;Alia Braley,&nbsp;Christopher J. Bryan,&nbsp;Jared B. Celniker,&nbsp;Mina Cikara,&nbsp;Margarett V. Clapper,&nbsp;Katherine Clayton,&nbsp;Hanne Collins,&nbsp;Evan DeFilippis,&nbsp;Macrina Dieffenbach,&nbsp;Kimberly C. Doell,&nbsp;Charles Dorison,&nbsp;Mylien Duong,&nbsp;Peter Felsman,&nbsp;Maya Fiorella,&nbsp;David Francis,&nbsp;Michael Franz,&nbsp;Roman A. Gallardo,&nbsp;Sara Gifford,&nbsp;Daniela Goya-Tocchetto,&nbsp;Kurt Gray,&nbsp;Joe Green,&nbsp;Joshua Greene,&nbsp;Mertcan Güngör,&nbsp;Matthew Hall,&nbsp;Cameron A. Hecht,&nbsp;Ali Javeed,&nbsp;John T. Jost,&nbsp;Aaron C. Kay,&nbsp;Nick R. Kay,&nbsp;Brandyn Keating,&nbsp;John Michael Kelly,&nbsp;James R. G. Kirk,&nbsp;Malka Kopell,&nbsp;Nour Kteily,&nbsp;Emily Kubin,&nbsp;Jeffrey Lees,&nbsp;Gabriel Lenz,&nbsp;Matthew Levendusky,&nbsp;Rebecca Littman,&nbsp;Kara Luo,&nbsp;Aaron Lyles,&nbsp;Ben Lyons,&nbsp;Wayde Marsh,&nbsp;James Martherus,&nbsp;Lauren Alpert Maurer,&nbsp;Caroline Mehl,&nbsp;Julia Minson,&nbsp;Molly Moore,&nbsp;Samantha L. Moore-Berg,&nbsp;Michael H. Pasek,&nbsp;Alex Pentland,&nbsp;Curtis Puryear,&nbsp;Hossein Rahnama,&nbsp;Steve Rathje,&nbsp;Jay Rosato,&nbsp;Maytal Saar-Tsechansky,&nbsp;Luiza Almeida Santos,&nbsp;Colleen M. Seifert,&nbsp;Azim Shariff,&nbsp;Otto Simonsson,&nbsp;Shiri Spitz Siddiqi,&nbsp;Daniel F. Stone,&nbsp;Palma Strand,&nbsp;Michael Tomz,&nbsp;David S. Yeager,&nbsp;Erez Yoeli,&nbsp;Jamil Zaki,&nbsp;James N. Druckman,&nbsp;David G. Rand,&nbsp;Robb Willer","doi":"10.1126/science.adh4764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div >Scholars warn that partisan divisions in the mass public threaten the health of American democracy. We conducted a megastudy (<i>n</i> = 32,059 participants) testing 25 treatments designed by academics and practitioners to reduce Americans’ partisan animosity and antidemocratic attitudes. We find that many treatments reduced partisan animosity, most strongly by highlighting relatable sympathetic individuals with different political beliefs or by emphasizing common identities shared by rival partisans. We also identify several treatments that reduced support for undemocratic practices—most strongly by correcting misperceptions of rival partisans’ views or highlighting the threat of democratic collapse—which shows that antidemocratic attitudes are not intractable. Taken together, the study’s findings identify promising general strategies for reducing partisan division and improving democratic attitudes, shedding theoretical light on challenges facing American democracy.</div>","PeriodicalId":21678,"journal":{"name":"Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":44.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.science.org/doi/reader/10.1126/science.adh4764","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh4764","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scholars warn that partisan divisions in the mass public threaten the health of American democracy. We conducted a megastudy (n = 32,059 participants) testing 25 treatments designed by academics and practitioners to reduce Americans’ partisan animosity and antidemocratic attitudes. We find that many treatments reduced partisan animosity, most strongly by highlighting relatable sympathetic individuals with different political beliefs or by emphasizing common identities shared by rival partisans. We also identify several treatments that reduced support for undemocratic practices—most strongly by correcting misperceptions of rival partisans’ views or highlighting the threat of democratic collapse—which shows that antidemocratic attitudes are not intractable. Taken together, the study’s findings identify promising general strategies for reducing partisan division and improving democratic attitudes, shedding theoretical light on challenges facing American democracy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大型研究测试 25 种减少反民主态度和党派敌意的疗法
学者们警告说,大众中的党派分歧威胁着美国民主的健康。我们开展了一项大型研究(n = 32,059 名参与者),对学者和从业人员设计的 25 种旨在减少美国人的党派敌意和反民主态度的疗法进行了测试。我们发现,许多治疗方法都能减少党派敌意,其中以突出具有不同政治信仰的可亲可近的同情者或强调敌对党派的共同身份最为有效。我们还发现了几种能减少对不民主做法支持的处理方法--其中以纠正对敌对党派观点的错误认识或强调民主崩溃的威胁最为有效--这表明反民主态度并非难以解决。总之,本研究的发现为减少党派分裂和改善民主态度找到了有前途的一般策略,为美国民主面临的挑战提供了理论依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Science
Science 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
61.10
自引率
0.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Science is a leading outlet for scientific news, commentary, and cutting-edge research. Through its print and online incarnations, Science reaches an estimated worldwide readership of more than one million. Science’s authorship is global too, and its articles consistently rank among the world's most cited research. Science serves as a forum for discussion of important issues related to the advancement of science by publishing material on which a consensus has been reached as well as including the presentation of minority or conflicting points of view. Accordingly, all articles published in Science—including editorials, news and comment, and book reviews—are signed and reflect the individual views of the authors and not official points of view adopted by AAAS or the institutions with which the authors are affiliated. Science seeks to publish those papers that are most influential in their fields or across fields and that will significantly advance scientific understanding. Selected papers should present novel and broadly important data, syntheses, or concepts. They should merit recognition by the wider scientific community and general public provided by publication in Science, beyond that provided by specialty journals. Science welcomes submissions from all fields of science and from any source. The editors are committed to the prompt evaluation and publication of submitted papers while upholding high standards that support reproducibility of published research. Science is published weekly; selected papers are published online ahead of print.
期刊最新文献
AI can help humans find common ground in democratic deliberation Mechanism of bacterial predation via ixotrophy Megastudy testing 25 treatments to reduce antidemocratic attitudes and partisan animosity Global rise in forest fire emissions linked to climate change in the extratropics The development and impact of tin selenide on thermoelectrics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1