Development and validation of the NCC-BC-A scale to assess patient-reported outcomes for breast cancer patients in China

Cancer Innovation Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1002/cai2.141
Fei Ma, Xiaoyan Yan, Xiuwen Guan, Tianmou Liu, PRO-BC China Standards Committee
{"title":"Development and validation of the NCC-BC-A scale to assess patient-reported outcomes for breast cancer patients in China","authors":"Fei Ma,&nbsp;Xiaoyan Yan,&nbsp;Xiuwen Guan,&nbsp;Tianmou Liu,&nbsp;PRO-BC China Standards Committee","doi":"10.1002/cai2.141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The commonly used international patient-reported outcome scales for breast cancer were developed before the advent of multiple targeted therapies and immunotherapies, rendering them potentially insufficient for current clinical practices. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a specific patient-reported outcome scale tailored for breast cancer patients in China to optimize the management model for these patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A comprehensive literature search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, Wanfang, and CNKI databases to extract dimensions and items for a potential patient-reported outcome scale. The Delphi method was used to modify, add, subtract, and adjust the language of items until the experts reached a consensus on the first draft. This draft was further refined using a cognitive test and a presurvey. The optimized scale was used for a formal survey, and the items were further analyzed and screened using metrics such as the coefficient of variation, correlation coefficient, internal item consistency, factor analysis, reliability, and validity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 10,954 articles were analyzed, and 237 were used to create a pool of 277 patient-reported outcome items. Through two rounds of Delphi expert consultation, the experts' authority coefficients were 0.739 and 0.826. After a cognitive test, several items were adjusted to enhance understanding. Further adjustments were made following a presurvey of 200 advanced breast cancer patients, resulting in a 38-item patient-reported outcomes scale, termed NCC-BC-A. In the national formal survey, 588 advanced breast cancer patients participated. Principal component analysis showed good consistency among the items and sufficient difference between the dimensions. The results were normally distributed with good variation. The Cronbach's <i>α</i> coefficient of the scale was 0.925 and the test–retest reliability was 0.9041.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The NCC-BC-A scale has high validity and reliability. It comprehensively considered the characteristics of systemic treatment for breast cancer, and the specific context within China. Its implementation may help clinicians to pay more attention to quality of life of breast cancer patients and to optimize the system for managing this condition.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100212,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Innovation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cai2.141","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cai2.141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The commonly used international patient-reported outcome scales for breast cancer were developed before the advent of multiple targeted therapies and immunotherapies, rendering them potentially insufficient for current clinical practices. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a specific patient-reported outcome scale tailored for breast cancer patients in China to optimize the management model for these patients.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, Wanfang, and CNKI databases to extract dimensions and items for a potential patient-reported outcome scale. The Delphi method was used to modify, add, subtract, and adjust the language of items until the experts reached a consensus on the first draft. This draft was further refined using a cognitive test and a presurvey. The optimized scale was used for a formal survey, and the items were further analyzed and screened using metrics such as the coefficient of variation, correlation coefficient, internal item consistency, factor analysis, reliability, and validity.

Results

A total of 10,954 articles were analyzed, and 237 were used to create a pool of 277 patient-reported outcome items. Through two rounds of Delphi expert consultation, the experts' authority coefficients were 0.739 and 0.826. After a cognitive test, several items were adjusted to enhance understanding. Further adjustments were made following a presurvey of 200 advanced breast cancer patients, resulting in a 38-item patient-reported outcomes scale, termed NCC-BC-A. In the national formal survey, 588 advanced breast cancer patients participated. Principal component analysis showed good consistency among the items and sufficient difference between the dimensions. The results were normally distributed with good variation. The Cronbach's α coefficient of the scale was 0.925 and the test–retest reliability was 0.9041.

Conclusion

The NCC-BC-A scale has high validity and reliability. It comprehensively considered the characteristics of systemic treatment for breast cancer, and the specific context within China. Its implementation may help clinicians to pay more attention to quality of life of breast cancer patients and to optimize the system for managing this condition.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发和验证 NCC-BC-A 量表以评估中国乳腺癌患者的患者报告结果
背景 国际上常用的乳腺癌患者报告结果量表是在多种靶向治疗和免疫治疗出现之前制定的,因此可能无法满足当前临床实践的需要。因此,有必要为中国乳腺癌患者量身定制患者报告结果量表,以优化乳腺癌患者的管理模式。 方法 在PubMed、Embase、万方和CNKI数据库中进行了全面的文献检索,以提取潜在的患者报告结果量表的维度和项目。采用德尔菲法对项目进行修改、增减和语言调整,直到专家们就初稿达成共识。通过认知测试和预调查进一步完善了初稿。优化后的量表用于正式调查,并使用变异系数、相关系数、内部项目一致性、因素分析、信度和效度等指标对项目进行进一步分析和筛选。 结果 共分析了 10954 篇文章,其中 237 篇文章被用于创建 277 个患者报告结果项目库。经过两轮德尔菲专家咨询,专家的权威系数分别为 0.739 和 0.826。经过认知测试后,对几个项目进行了调整,以加深理解。在对 200 名晚期乳腺癌患者进行预调查后,又做了进一步调整,最终形成了 38 个项目的患者报告结果量表,称为 NCC-BC-A。在全国正式调查中,共有 588 名晚期乳腺癌患者参与。主成分分析表明,各项目之间具有良好的一致性,各维度之间也有足够的差异。结果呈正态分布,差异较小。量表的 Cronbach's α 系数为 0.925,重测信度为 0.9041。 结论 NCC-BC-A 量表具有较高的效度和信度。它全面考虑了乳腺癌系统治疗的特点和中国的具体情况。该量表的实施有助于临床医生更加关注乳腺癌患者的生活质量,优化乳腺癌的治疗体系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Combination therapy using low-dose anlotinib and immune checkpoint inhibitors for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer Beyond clinical trials: CDK4/6 inhibitor efficacy predictors and nomogram model from real-world evidence in metastatic breast cancer Prognostic nomograms for young breast cancer: A retrospective study based on the SEER and METABRIC databases Retinoic acid receptor responder 2 and lipid metabolic reprogramming: A new insight into brain metastasis Leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptor B4: A keystone in immune modulation and therapeutic target in cancer and beyond
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1