Williams Racing and Dorilton Capital: Epideictic Blandness in Organizational Change

IF 3.2 1区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Communication & Sport Pub Date : 2024-10-19 DOI:10.1177/21674795241289792
Mike Milford
{"title":"Williams Racing and Dorilton Capital: Epideictic Blandness in Organizational Change","authors":"Mike Milford","doi":"10.1177/21674795241289792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2020 the third-oldest racing team in Formula 1, Williams Racing, sold to Dorilton Capital, a global investment group. The change was a dramatic shift in the organization’s identity, from four decades of family ownership to a faceless global fund with no ties to racing. Drastic turns such as these are challenging for organizations. Shifts in identity generate uncertainty with stakeholders, a particular problem for sports organizations where identities and values are prominent. One remedy is epideictic rhetoric, a form that utilizes common values to create identification and orient stakeholders’ interpretations of the change. However, an emphasis on values can invite unwelcome scrutiny that could exacerbate problems. The Williams/Dorilton case demonstrates how organizations can rely on blandness through epideictic rhetoric that mitigates negative aspects through an emphasis on featureless continuity.","PeriodicalId":46882,"journal":{"name":"Communication & Sport","volume":"233 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication & Sport","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21674795241289792","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2020 the third-oldest racing team in Formula 1, Williams Racing, sold to Dorilton Capital, a global investment group. The change was a dramatic shift in the organization’s identity, from four decades of family ownership to a faceless global fund with no ties to racing. Drastic turns such as these are challenging for organizations. Shifts in identity generate uncertainty with stakeholders, a particular problem for sports organizations where identities and values are prominent. One remedy is epideictic rhetoric, a form that utilizes common values to create identification and orient stakeholders’ interpretations of the change. However, an emphasis on values can invite unwelcome scrutiny that could exacerbate problems. The Williams/Dorilton case demonstrates how organizations can rely on blandness through epideictic rhetoric that mitigates negative aspects through an emphasis on featureless continuity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
威廉姆斯车队和多尔顿资本:组织变革中的表象平淡
2020 年,一级方程式中历史第三悠久的威廉姆斯车队出售给了全球投资集团 Dorilton Capital。这一变化是该组织身份的巨大转变,从四十年的家族所有权转变为一个与赛车毫无关系的不露面的全球基金。像这样的急剧转变对企业来说极具挑战性。身份的转变会给利益相关者带来不确定性,这对于身份和价值观非常突出的体育组织来说是一个特殊的问题。一种补救措施是表意修辞,这种形式利用共同的价值观来建立认同,并引导利益相关者对变化的解释。然而,强调价值观可能会招致不受欢迎的审查,从而加剧问题。威廉姆斯/多里尔顿公司的案例表明,组织可以通过表意性修辞依赖平淡,通过强调无特色的连续性来减轻负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
44
期刊最新文献
Defamiliarizing Concussions: Sports Fandom, Injury, and Potential Attitudinal Shifts The Use and Effect of Statistics in U.S. Professional Sports Leagues’ X Posts on Engagement, Enjoyment, and Emotion (Re)Coding the “Black Quarterback”: A 20-Year Critical Quantitative Analysis of Racial Stacking and the Mediated Dichotomy Between “Pro-Style” and “Dual-Threat” ‘Discursive Interpretations of Cultural Symbols in Mega Sporting Events: The Case of Messi’s Bisht at the 2022 World Cup’ 10 Years of Communication & Sport: A Review of Theory, Method, and Authorship
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1