{"title":"A review on sulfur trioxide (SO3) removal from coal combustion process: Research progress challenges and suggestions","authors":"Liqun Lian, Dexing Kong, Yan Wang, Yangxian Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.seppur.2024.130190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the increasingly strict requirements for pollutant emissions from coal-burning power stations, the excessive emission issues of SO<sub>3</sub> has attracted increasing attention. SO<sub>3</sub> can be generated by containing-sulfur substance combustion in furnace and catalytic action of selective catalytic reduction (SCR) denitration catalyzer. When the contents of SO<sub>3</sub> in flue gas are too high, it can cause several problems such as ash accumulation, blockage, and corrosion of various equipments, which seriously affects the safe and stable operation of coal-burning power stations. Besides, excessive emissions of SO<sub>3</sub> can form colored smoke, causing serious impacts on the ecological environment and human health. Some countries and regions have introduced relevant regulations to control SO<sub>3</sub> emission and promote the development of SO<sub>3</sub> control technology and strategy. This article focuses on reviewing various removal technology of SO<sub>3</sub> from coal-fired flue gas, mainly including SO<sub>3</sub> removal inside furnace, SO<sub>3</sub> control by SCR catalyst, SO<sub>3</sub> removal using dust collectors, SO<sub>3</sub> removal using desulfurization devices, SO<sub>3</sub> removal using flue gas injection adsorbent, and combined use of various removal technologies. The principles and performance of various SO<sub>3</sub> removal technologies are introduced. The applicability and limitations of these SO<sub>3</sub> removal technologies are also analyzed and compared. The alkaline adsorbent injection technology has strong adaptability and good desulfurization effect, receiving widespread attention. By adjusting the molar ratio of the adsorbent to SO<sub>3</sub>, it is possible to achieve SO<sub>3</sub> removal efficiency of over 90%. Regulating the structure and active components of catalysts can reduce the amount of SO<sub>3</sub> generated in SCR system. Wet electrostatic precipitators can achieve a SO<sub>3</sub> removal efficiency of up to 90%, and reducing inlet flue gas temperature of wet electrostatic precipitators can effectively enhance the SO<sub>3</sub> removal. This review can provide necessary reference and guidance for design and development of new technologies for SO<sub>3</sub> control.","PeriodicalId":427,"journal":{"name":"Separation and Purification Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Separation and Purification Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2024.130190","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
With the increasingly strict requirements for pollutant emissions from coal-burning power stations, the excessive emission issues of SO3 has attracted increasing attention. SO3 can be generated by containing-sulfur substance combustion in furnace and catalytic action of selective catalytic reduction (SCR) denitration catalyzer. When the contents of SO3 in flue gas are too high, it can cause several problems such as ash accumulation, blockage, and corrosion of various equipments, which seriously affects the safe and stable operation of coal-burning power stations. Besides, excessive emissions of SO3 can form colored smoke, causing serious impacts on the ecological environment and human health. Some countries and regions have introduced relevant regulations to control SO3 emission and promote the development of SO3 control technology and strategy. This article focuses on reviewing various removal technology of SO3 from coal-fired flue gas, mainly including SO3 removal inside furnace, SO3 control by SCR catalyst, SO3 removal using dust collectors, SO3 removal using desulfurization devices, SO3 removal using flue gas injection adsorbent, and combined use of various removal technologies. The principles and performance of various SO3 removal technologies are introduced. The applicability and limitations of these SO3 removal technologies are also analyzed and compared. The alkaline adsorbent injection technology has strong adaptability and good desulfurization effect, receiving widespread attention. By adjusting the molar ratio of the adsorbent to SO3, it is possible to achieve SO3 removal efficiency of over 90%. Regulating the structure and active components of catalysts can reduce the amount of SO3 generated in SCR system. Wet electrostatic precipitators can achieve a SO3 removal efficiency of up to 90%, and reducing inlet flue gas temperature of wet electrostatic precipitators can effectively enhance the SO3 removal. This review can provide necessary reference and guidance for design and development of new technologies for SO3 control.
期刊介绍:
Separation and Purification Technology is a premier journal committed to sharing innovative methods for separation and purification in chemical and environmental engineering, encompassing both homogeneous solutions and heterogeneous mixtures. Our scope includes the separation and/or purification of liquids, vapors, and gases, as well as carbon capture and separation techniques. However, it's important to note that methods solely intended for analytical purposes are not within the scope of the journal. Additionally, disciplines such as soil science, polymer science, and metallurgy fall outside the purview of Separation and Purification Technology. Join us in advancing the field of separation and purification methods for sustainable solutions in chemical and environmental engineering.