Francis Wanjohi Kiemo, Pál Salamon, Zoltán Tóth, Zoltán Szabó
{"title":"Defense strategies against sweet potato chlorotic stunt and pakakuy virus coinfection unraveled","authors":"Francis Wanjohi Kiemo, Pál Salamon, Zoltán Tóth, Zoltán Szabó","doi":"10.1002/csc2.21392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study into the response of two <i>Ipomoea batatas</i> (L.) Lam cultivars, Melinda and Tio Joe, to coinfection with sweet potato chlorotic stunt virus (SPCSV) and sweet potato pakakuy virus (SPPV), employed a comprehensive approach encompassing symptomatology, real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction, metagenomics, and transcriptomics. SPCSV is a quarantine virus with synergistic effects, which decimate yields. SPPV is the most prevalent DNA virus in sweet potato germplasm, with a tendency to persist in meristems, posing a significant risk for germplasm transfer between territories. Graft inoculation experiments revealed that while Tio Joe remained asymptomatic for 12 weeks and suppressed virus replication, Melinda displayed symptoms early on and exhibited high virus titers. Metagenomic analyses corroborated these observations and confirmed that SPCSV and SPPV were responsible. Transcriptomic analysis unveiled disparities in gene expression between Melinda and Tio Joe. Differential gene expression was heightened and altered in Melinda as the viruses disrupted its gene expression. Its defense strategies, such as inducing abscisic acid signaling, were insufficient to overcome disruptive viral effects like oxidative stress, rendering it susceptible. In contrast, Tio Joe had relatively stable differential gene expression, indicating resistance to SPPV–SPCSV coinfection. Overexpressed genes such as sirtuin, rapid alkalization factor, and nuclear pore anchor triggered quantitative resistance, supported with enriched organelles such as mitochondrion and pathways such as proteasome and cutin, suberine, and wax biosynthesis. Tio Joe maintained its genome integrity and inhibited viral replication by tightly controlling gene expression and preventing reactive oxygen species accumulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10849,"journal":{"name":"Crop Science","volume":"64 6","pages":"3438-3460"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/csc2.21392","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/csc2.21392","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study into the response of two Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam cultivars, Melinda and Tio Joe, to coinfection with sweet potato chlorotic stunt virus (SPCSV) and sweet potato pakakuy virus (SPPV), employed a comprehensive approach encompassing symptomatology, real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction, metagenomics, and transcriptomics. SPCSV is a quarantine virus with synergistic effects, which decimate yields. SPPV is the most prevalent DNA virus in sweet potato germplasm, with a tendency to persist in meristems, posing a significant risk for germplasm transfer between territories. Graft inoculation experiments revealed that while Tio Joe remained asymptomatic for 12 weeks and suppressed virus replication, Melinda displayed symptoms early on and exhibited high virus titers. Metagenomic analyses corroborated these observations and confirmed that SPCSV and SPPV were responsible. Transcriptomic analysis unveiled disparities in gene expression between Melinda and Tio Joe. Differential gene expression was heightened and altered in Melinda as the viruses disrupted its gene expression. Its defense strategies, such as inducing abscisic acid signaling, were insufficient to overcome disruptive viral effects like oxidative stress, rendering it susceptible. In contrast, Tio Joe had relatively stable differential gene expression, indicating resistance to SPPV–SPCSV coinfection. Overexpressed genes such as sirtuin, rapid alkalization factor, and nuclear pore anchor triggered quantitative resistance, supported with enriched organelles such as mitochondrion and pathways such as proteasome and cutin, suberine, and wax biosynthesis. Tio Joe maintained its genome integrity and inhibited viral replication by tightly controlling gene expression and preventing reactive oxygen species accumulation.
本研究采用了一种包括症状学、实时定量聚合酶链式反应、元基因组学和转录组学在内的综合方法,探讨了两个甘薯栽培品种 Melinda 和 Tio Joe 对甘薯萎黄病病毒(SPCSV)和甘薯白斑病毒(SPPV)共同感染的反应。SPCSV 是一种具有协同效应的检疫病毒,会降低产量。SPPV 是甘薯种质中最普遍的 DNA 病毒,有在分生组织中持续存在的趋势,对不同地区之间的种质转移构成重大风险。嫁接接种实验表明,Tio Joe 在 12 周内无症状并抑制病毒复制,而 Melinda 则很早就出现症状并表现出很高的病毒滴度。元基因组分析证实了这些观察结果,并确认是 SPCSV 和 SPPV 引起的。转录组分析揭示了 Melinda 和 Tio Joe 基因表达的差异。由于病毒破坏了梅琳达的基因表达,它的基因表达差异加剧并发生了改变。它的防御策略(如诱导赤霉酸信号转导)不足以克服氧化应激等病毒的破坏性影响,从而使其易感。相比之下,Tio Joe 的差异基因表达相对稳定,表明其对 SPPV-SPCSV 共感染具有抗性。sirtuin、快速碱化因子和核孔锚等基因的过度表达引发了定量抗性,线粒体等细胞器和蛋白酶体、角质素、亚精胺和蜡质生物合成等通路的富集也提供了支持。Tio Joe 通过严格控制基因表达和防止活性氧积累,保持了基因组的完整性并抑制了病毒复制。
期刊介绍:
Articles in Crop Science are of interest to researchers, policy makers, educators, and practitioners. The scope of articles in Crop Science includes crop breeding and genetics; crop physiology and metabolism; crop ecology, production, and management; seed physiology, production, and technology; turfgrass science; forage and grazing land ecology and management; genomics, molecular genetics, and biotechnology; germplasm collections and their use; and biomedical, health beneficial, and nutritionally enhanced plants. Crop Science publishes thematic collections of articles across its scope and includes topical Review and Interpretation, and Perspectives articles.