A methodology to select and adjust quantum noise models through emulators: benchmarking against real backends

IF 5.8 2区 物理与天体物理 Q1 OPTICS EPJ Quantum Technology Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1140/epjqt/s40507-024-00284-4
J. A. Bravo-Montes, Miriam Bastante, Guillermo Botella, Alberto del Barrio, F. García-Herrero
{"title":"A methodology to select and adjust quantum noise models through emulators: benchmarking against real backends","authors":"J. A. Bravo-Montes,&nbsp;Miriam Bastante,&nbsp;Guillermo Botella,&nbsp;Alberto del Barrio,&nbsp;F. García-Herrero","doi":"10.1140/epjqt/s40507-024-00284-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Currently, access to quantum processors is costly in terms of time, and power. There are quantum simulators and emulators on the market that offer alternatives for evaluating the behavior of a real quantum processor. However, these emulation environments present accuracy deviations from real devices, mainly because of difficult-to-model error sources. In this study, a methodology is proposed that allows the selection of noise models and adjustment of their parameters, considering the nature of the backends (technology, topology, vendor, model, etc.). The proposed methodology is illustrated using a small superconducting example based on the <i>ibm_perth</i> backend (seven qubits) and a comparison between the quantum emulators <i>Qaptiva</i> and <i>Qiskit</i>, where six different noise models are applied, achieving a fidelity deviation of 0.686% at best with respect to the real device.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":547,"journal":{"name":"EPJ Quantum Technology","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://epjquantumtechnology.springeropen.com/counter/pdf/10.1140/epjqt/s40507-024-00284-4","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EPJ Quantum Technology","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjqt/s40507-024-00284-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Currently, access to quantum processors is costly in terms of time, and power. There are quantum simulators and emulators on the market that offer alternatives for evaluating the behavior of a real quantum processor. However, these emulation environments present accuracy deviations from real devices, mainly because of difficult-to-model error sources. In this study, a methodology is proposed that allows the selection of noise models and adjustment of their parameters, considering the nature of the backends (technology, topology, vendor, model, etc.). The proposed methodology is illustrated using a small superconducting example based on the ibm_perth backend (seven qubits) and a comparison between the quantum emulators Qaptiva and Qiskit, where six different noise models are applied, achieving a fidelity deviation of 0.686% at best with respect to the real device.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过仿真器选择和调整量子噪声模型的方法:以真实后端为基准
目前,使用量子处理器需要耗费大量时间和电力。市场上的量子模拟器和仿真器为评估真实量子处理器的行为提供了替代方案。然而,这些仿真环境与真实设备存在精度偏差,主要原因是难以模拟误差源。本研究提出了一种方法,可根据后端设备的性质(技术、拓扑结构、供应商、模型等)选择噪声模型并调整其参数。我们使用一个基于 ibm_perth 后端(7 个量子位)的小型超导示例,以及量子仿真器 Qaptiva 和 Qiskit 之间的比较来说明所提出的方法,其中应用了 6 种不同的噪声模型,与真实设备的保真度偏差最多为 0.686%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
EPJ Quantum Technology
EPJ Quantum Technology Physics and Astronomy-Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
7.50%
发文量
28
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Driven by advances in technology and experimental capability, the last decade has seen the emergence of quantum technology: a new praxis for controlling the quantum world. It is now possible to engineer complex, multi-component systems that merge the once distinct fields of quantum optics and condensed matter physics. EPJ Quantum Technology covers theoretical and experimental advances in subjects including but not limited to the following: Quantum measurement, metrology and lithography Quantum complex systems, networks and cellular automata Quantum electromechanical systems Quantum optomechanical systems Quantum machines, engineering and nanorobotics Quantum control theory Quantum information, communication and computation Quantum thermodynamics Quantum metamaterials The effect of Casimir forces on micro- and nano-electromechanical systems Quantum biology Quantum sensing Hybrid quantum systems Quantum simulations.
期刊最新文献
Integration of germanium-vacancy single photon emitters arrays in diamond nanopillars Pulse shape optimization against Doppler shifts and delays in optical quantum communication QCCP: a taskflow programming model for emerging computing scenario Investigating the use of multiple representations in university courses on quantum technologies Tight upper bound of the maximal quantum violation of Gisin’s elegant Bell inequality and its application in randomness certification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1