Adverse Childhood Experiences and Suboptimal Self-Rated Health in Adulthood: Exploring Effect Modification by Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH American Journal of Health Promotion Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI:10.1177/08901171241293412
Olatokunbo Osibogun
{"title":"Adverse Childhood Experiences and Suboptimal Self-Rated Health in Adulthood: Exploring Effect Modification by Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity.","authors":"Olatokunbo Osibogun","doi":"10.1177/08901171241293412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examined whether the relationship between adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and self-rated health among adults in a nationally representative population is modified by age, sex, or race/ethnicity.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>United States.</p><p><strong>Sample: </strong>Data from the 2020 and 2021 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System were obtained from 185 731 (weighted N = 47 862 016) persons 18 years or older.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>The ACE cumulative score (range: 0-11) was calculated using 11 questions about childhood emotional abuse, physical abuse, sexual abuse, and household dysfunction before age 18 and classified as 0 (reference), 1, 2, 3, or ≥4. Self-rated health was divided into (excellent/very good/good [reference]) and suboptimal (fair/poor) categories.</p><p><strong>Analysis: </strong>Multivariable-adjusted logistic regression was conducted to test for the interaction with age, sex, and race/ethnicity with ACEs. After adjustment for potential confounders, an increasing number of ACEs had statistically significantly higher odds of suboptimal self-rated health in a graded manner except for 1 ACE (1 ACE: aOR:1.09; 95% CI: 1.00-1.20, 2 ACEs: 1.16; 1.03-1.30, 3 ACEs: 1.17; 1.03-1.32 and ≥4 ACEs: 1.39; 1.26-1.53). There was a significant interaction between ACEs and age. Younger age (18-24 years) had the strongest association for ≥4 ACEs compared to the older age groups. There was no effect modification by sex or race.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ACEs should be considered when creating health-promoting interventions to improve health.</p>","PeriodicalId":7481,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Promotion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171241293412","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study examined whether the relationship between adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and self-rated health among adults in a nationally representative population is modified by age, sex, or race/ethnicity.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting: United States.

Sample: Data from the 2020 and 2021 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System were obtained from 185 731 (weighted N = 47 862 016) persons 18 years or older.

Measures: The ACE cumulative score (range: 0-11) was calculated using 11 questions about childhood emotional abuse, physical abuse, sexual abuse, and household dysfunction before age 18 and classified as 0 (reference), 1, 2, 3, or ≥4. Self-rated health was divided into (excellent/very good/good [reference]) and suboptimal (fair/poor) categories.

Analysis: Multivariable-adjusted logistic regression was conducted to test for the interaction with age, sex, and race/ethnicity with ACEs. After adjustment for potential confounders, an increasing number of ACEs had statistically significantly higher odds of suboptimal self-rated health in a graded manner except for 1 ACE (1 ACE: aOR:1.09; 95% CI: 1.00-1.20, 2 ACEs: 1.16; 1.03-1.30, 3 ACEs: 1.17; 1.03-1.32 and ≥4 ACEs: 1.39; 1.26-1.53). There was a significant interaction between ACEs and age. Younger age (18-24 years) had the strongest association for ≥4 ACEs compared to the older age groups. There was no effect modification by sex or race.

Conclusion: ACEs should be considered when creating health-promoting interventions to improve health.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
童年的不良经历与成年后的自我健康评价不佳:探索年龄、性别和种族/族裔对效果的修正。
目的:本研究调查了全国代表性人群中成年人的童年不良经历(ACE)与自评健康之间的关系是否会因年龄、性别或种族/民族而改变:设计:横断面研究:样本:美国从 2020 年和 2021 年行为风险因素监测系统中获得了 185 731 名(加权 N = 47 862 016)18 岁及以上人群的数据:ACE累积得分(范围:0-11)由11个关于18岁前童年情感虐待、身体虐待、性虐待和家庭功能障碍的问题计算得出,分为0(参考)、1、2、3或≥4。自评健康状况分为(优/很好/好[参考])和次优(一般/差)两类:进行了多变量调整逻辑回归,以检验年龄、性别和种族/民族与 ACE 之间的相互作用。在对潜在的混杂因素进行调整后,除了 1 个 ACE 外(1 个 ACE:aOR:1.09;95% CI:1.00-1.20;2 个 ACE:1.16;1.03-1.30;3 个 ACE:1.17;1.03-1.32;≥4 个 ACE:1.39;1.26-1.53),ACE 数量越多,自评健康欠佳的几率就越高。ACE 与年龄之间存在明显的交互作用。与年龄较大的人群相比,年龄较小(18-24 岁)的人群与≥4 ACEs 的关联性最强。性别或种族没有影响:结论:在制定促进健康的干预措施以改善健康状况时,应考虑到 ACE。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Health Promotion
American Journal of Health Promotion PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The editorial goal of the American Journal of Health Promotion is to provide a forum for exchange among the many disciplines involved in health promotion and an interface between researchers and practitioners.
期刊最新文献
A Health System-Community Partnership to Advance Health Equity. Collaborating for Health Equity: A Perspective of an Federally Qualified Health Center's Community Partnerships and Initiatives. In Briefs. The Role of Health Systems in Cross-Sector Collaboration in Addressing Social Determinants of Health and Promoting Health and Well-Being. The Role of Health Systems in Cross-Sector Collaboration in Addressing Social Determinants of Health and Promoting Health and Well-Being.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1