Core outcome set for studies evaluating interventions to prevent or treat delirium in long-term care older residents: international key stakeholder informed consensus study.

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Age and ageing Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1093/ageing/afae227
Gregor Russell, Namrata Rana, Siobhan T Reilly, Anas Shehadeh, Valerie Page, Najma Siddiqi, Louise Rose
{"title":"Core outcome set for studies evaluating interventions to prevent or treat delirium in long-term care older residents: international key stakeholder informed consensus study.","authors":"Gregor Russell, Namrata Rana, Siobhan T Reilly, Anas Shehadeh, Valerie Page, Najma Siddiqi, Louise Rose","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afae227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trials of interventions to prevent or treat delirium in older adults resident in long-term care settings (LTC) report heterogenous outcomes, hampering the identification of effective management strategies for this important condition. Our objective was to develop international consensus among key stakeholders for a core outcome set (COS) for future trials of interventions to prevent and/or treat delirium in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a rigorous COS development process including qualitative interviews with family members and staff with experience of delirium in LTC; a modified two-round Delphi survey; and virtual consensus meetings using nominal group technique. The study was registered with the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative (https://www.comet-initiative.org/studies/details/796).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Item generation identified 22 delirium-specific outcomes and 32 other outcomes from 18 qualitative interviews. When combined with outcomes identified in our earlier systematic review, and following an item reduction step, this gave 43 outcomes that advanced to the formal consensus processes. These involved 169 participants from 12 countries, and included healthcare professionals (121, 72%), researchers (24, 14%), and family members/people with experience of delirium (24, 14%). Six outcomes were identified as essential to include in all trials of interventions for delirium in LTC, and were therefore included in the COS. These are: 'delirium occurrence'; 'delirium related distress'; 'delirium severity'; 'cognition including memory', 'admission to hospital' and 'mortality'.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This COS, endorsed by the American Delirium Society and the European and Australasian Delirium Associations, is recommended for use in future clinical trials evaluating delirium prevention or treatment interventions for older adults residing in LTC.</p>","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":"53 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11471312/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Age and ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afae227","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Trials of interventions to prevent or treat delirium in older adults resident in long-term care settings (LTC) report heterogenous outcomes, hampering the identification of effective management strategies for this important condition. Our objective was to develop international consensus among key stakeholders for a core outcome set (COS) for future trials of interventions to prevent and/or treat delirium in this population.

Methods: We used a rigorous COS development process including qualitative interviews with family members and staff with experience of delirium in LTC; a modified two-round Delphi survey; and virtual consensus meetings using nominal group technique. The study was registered with the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative (https://www.comet-initiative.org/studies/details/796).

Results: Item generation identified 22 delirium-specific outcomes and 32 other outcomes from 18 qualitative interviews. When combined with outcomes identified in our earlier systematic review, and following an item reduction step, this gave 43 outcomes that advanced to the formal consensus processes. These involved 169 participants from 12 countries, and included healthcare professionals (121, 72%), researchers (24, 14%), and family members/people with experience of delirium (24, 14%). Six outcomes were identified as essential to include in all trials of interventions for delirium in LTC, and were therefore included in the COS. These are: 'delirium occurrence'; 'delirium related distress'; 'delirium severity'; 'cognition including memory', 'admission to hospital' and 'mortality'.

Conclusions: This COS, endorsed by the American Delirium Society and the European and Australasian Delirium Associations, is recommended for use in future clinical trials evaluating delirium prevention or treatment interventions for older adults residing in LTC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估长期护理老年居民谵妄预防或治疗干预措施研究的核心结果集:国际主要利益相关者知情共识研究。
背景:针对长期护理机构(LTC)中老年人谵妄预防或治疗干预措施的试验报告结果各不相同,这阻碍了针对这一重要病症的有效管理策略的确定。我们的目标是在主要利益相关者之间就核心结果集(COS)达成国际共识,以便今后对预防和/或治疗该人群谵妄的干预措施进行试验:我们采用了一套严格的核心结果集开发流程,包括对具有长者照护中心谵妄经验的家庭成员和工作人员进行定性访谈;修改后的两轮德尔菲调查;以及采用名义小组技术的虚拟共识会议。该研究已在 "有效性试验中的核心结果测量"(COMET)计划中注册(https://www.comet-initiative.org/studies/details/796)。结果:结果:项目生成从 18 次定性访谈中确定了 22 项谵妄特异性结果和 32 项其他结果。结合我们早期系统性回顾中确定的结果,并经过项目缩减步骤,最终有 43 项结果进入了正式的共识流程。来自 12 个国家的 169 名参与者参与了这一过程,其中包括医护人员(121 人,占 72%)、研究人员(24 人,占 14%)以及家庭成员/有谵妄经历的人(24 人,占 14%)。有六项结果被认为是所有针对长者照护中心谵妄的干预试验中必须包括的,因此被纳入了 COS。它们是谵妄发生率"、"谵妄相关痛苦"、"谵妄严重程度"、"认知(包括记忆)"、"入院 "和 "死亡率":本 COS 得到了美国谵妄学会、欧洲和澳大利亚谵妄协会的认可,建议在未来评估针对居住在 LTC 中的老年人的谵妄预防或治疗干预措施的临床试验中使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Age and ageing
Age and ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
6.00%
发文量
796
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Age and Ageing is an international journal publishing refereed original articles and commissioned reviews on geriatric medicine and gerontology. Its range includes research on ageing and clinical, epidemiological, and psychological aspects of later life.
期刊最新文献
Systematic review of guideline recommendations for older and frail adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus A scoping review of the measurement and analysis of frailty in randomised controlled trials The effect of multidomain lifestyle intervention on health care service use and costs - secondary analyses from the Finnish Geriatric Intervention Study to Prevent Cognitive Impairment and Disability (FINGER): a randomised controlled trial Menopause age and type and dementia risk: a pooled analysis of 233 802 women Equality of opportunity for timely dementia diagnosis (EQUATED): a qualitative study of how people from minoritised ethnic groups experience the early symptoms of dementia and seek help
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1