Does Early Continuous Passive Motion Improves Effectiveness of Physical Therapy After Arthroscopic Release of Elbow Contracture: A Prospective Randomized Trial.
M M Lihua Huang, Yanmao Wang, Yanhong Ma, Jian Ding, Shengdi Lu
{"title":"Does Early Continuous Passive Motion Improves Effectiveness of Physical Therapy After Arthroscopic Release of Elbow Contracture: A Prospective Randomized Trial.","authors":"M M Lihua Huang, Yanmao Wang, Yanhong Ma, Jian Ding, Shengdi Lu","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effectiveness of early continuous passive motion combined with physical therapy compared to physical therapy alone as the rehabilitation protocol after the release of elbow contracture.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>In this randomized controlled trial, 61 patients were randomly assigned to two groups (31 in the early continuous passive motion with physical therapy group vs. 30 in the physical therapy group). The patients received rehabilitation with or without early continuous passive motion for 4 weeks and were followed up for 6 months. The outcome measures were the range of motion and Mayo Elbow Performance Score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The early continuous passive motion with physical therapy group demonstrated statistically significant improvements in range of motion and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score compared with the physical therapy group at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. These differences were not observed in the stability subscale of the Mayo Elbow Performance Score at any of the assessed time points, nor in its pain subscale at 6 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with physical therapy alone, early continuous passive motion combined with physical therapy enabled a quicker recovery of functional elbow motion and early pain control within the 6-month follow-up after arthroscopic release of elbow contracture.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002646","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of early continuous passive motion combined with physical therapy compared to physical therapy alone as the rehabilitation protocol after the release of elbow contracture.
Design: In this randomized controlled trial, 61 patients were randomly assigned to two groups (31 in the early continuous passive motion with physical therapy group vs. 30 in the physical therapy group). The patients received rehabilitation with or without early continuous passive motion for 4 weeks and were followed up for 6 months. The outcome measures were the range of motion and Mayo Elbow Performance Score.
Results: The early continuous passive motion with physical therapy group demonstrated statistically significant improvements in range of motion and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score compared with the physical therapy group at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. These differences were not observed in the stability subscale of the Mayo Elbow Performance Score at any of the assessed time points, nor in its pain subscale at 6 months.
Conclusion: Compared with physical therapy alone, early continuous passive motion combined with physical therapy enabled a quicker recovery of functional elbow motion and early pain control within the 6-month follow-up after arthroscopic release of elbow contracture.
期刊介绍:
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation focuses on the practice, research and educational aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Monthly issues keep physiatrists up-to-date on the optimal functional restoration of patients with disabilities, physical treatment of neuromuscular impairments, the development of new rehabilitative technologies, and the use of electrodiagnostic studies. The Journal publishes cutting-edge basic and clinical research, clinical case reports and in-depth topical reviews of interest to rehabilitation professionals.
Topics include prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal conditions, brain injury, spinal cord injury, cardiopulmonary disease, trauma, acute and chronic pain, amputation, prosthetics and orthotics, mobility, gait, and pediatrics as well as areas related to education and administration. Other important areas of interest include cancer rehabilitation, aging, and exercise. The Journal has recently published a series of articles on the topic of outcomes research. This well-established journal is the official scholarly publication of the Association of Academic Physiatrists (AAP).