Compliance with the 2016 WHO's antenatal care recommendation and its determinants among women in Sub-Saharan Africa: a multilevel-analysis of population survey data.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Health Services Research Pub Date : 2024-10-12 DOI:10.1186/s12913-024-11716-3
Kusse Urmale Mare, Kebede Gemeda Sabo, Yordanos Sisay Asgedom, Zufan Alamrie Asmare, Tsion Mulat Tebeje, Abdu Hailu Shibeshi, Afework Alemu Lombebo, Bezawit Melak Fente, Bizunesh Fantahun Kase, Hiwot Altaye Asebe, Beminate Lemma Seifu
{"title":"Compliance with the 2016 WHO's antenatal care recommendation and its determinants among women in Sub-Saharan Africa: a multilevel-analysis of population survey data.","authors":"Kusse Urmale Mare, Kebede Gemeda Sabo, Yordanos Sisay Asgedom, Zufan Alamrie Asmare, Tsion Mulat Tebeje, Abdu Hailu Shibeshi, Afework Alemu Lombebo, Bezawit Melak Fente, Bizunesh Fantahun Kase, Hiwot Altaye Asebe, Beminate Lemma Seifu","doi":"10.1186/s12913-024-11716-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the positive impact of adhering to the new antenatal care model on pregnancy outcomes and maternal health service uptake, women in resource-limited settings exhibit low levels of compliance with this recommendation. Previous studies on women's adherence to the new antenatal care recommendation have been limited to individual countries, with no evidence available at Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) level. Therefore, this study sought to investigate compliance with the 2016 WHO's recommendation of at least eight antenatal care contacts among women in SSA countries and identify its determinants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study utilized a weighted sample of 101,983 women who had received antenatal care during their index pregnancy, drawn from recent DHS data of sixteen SSA countries. A multilevel mixed-effect analysis was conducted to identify factors that influence compliance with new antenatal care recommendations. Model comparison was performed using deviance and log-likelihood values, and statistical significance was determined at a P-value of less than 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The level of compliance with the recommended antenatal care contacts among women in SSA was 9.9% (95% CI: 9.7-10.1%), with the highest rate in Sierra Leone (26.1%) and lowest in Rwanda (< 1%). A multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that age, education, employment status, household wealth, healthcare decisions, the timing of antenatal contacts, consumption of nutritional supplements, residence, community-level women illiteracy, and media exposure were the significant determinants of compliance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Only one in ten pregnant women in SSA countries had attended the recommended number of antenatal contacts, with Sierra Leone having the highest compliance rate and Rwanda and Senegal having the lowest. Therefore, policymakers should focus on improving access to education, especially for women and their partners, and providing exempted services for pregnant women from low-income households. Interventions that target communities with low levels of literacy and media exposure could also be effective in improving the uptake of the services.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11470636/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11716-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the positive impact of adhering to the new antenatal care model on pregnancy outcomes and maternal health service uptake, women in resource-limited settings exhibit low levels of compliance with this recommendation. Previous studies on women's adherence to the new antenatal care recommendation have been limited to individual countries, with no evidence available at Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) level. Therefore, this study sought to investigate compliance with the 2016 WHO's recommendation of at least eight antenatal care contacts among women in SSA countries and identify its determinants.

Methods: The study utilized a weighted sample of 101,983 women who had received antenatal care during their index pregnancy, drawn from recent DHS data of sixteen SSA countries. A multilevel mixed-effect analysis was conducted to identify factors that influence compliance with new antenatal care recommendations. Model comparison was performed using deviance and log-likelihood values, and statistical significance was determined at a P-value of less than 0.05.

Results: The level of compliance with the recommended antenatal care contacts among women in SSA was 9.9% (95% CI: 9.7-10.1%), with the highest rate in Sierra Leone (26.1%) and lowest in Rwanda (< 1%). A multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that age, education, employment status, household wealth, healthcare decisions, the timing of antenatal contacts, consumption of nutritional supplements, residence, community-level women illiteracy, and media exposure were the significant determinants of compliance.

Conclusion: Only one in ten pregnant women in SSA countries had attended the recommended number of antenatal contacts, with Sierra Leone having the highest compliance rate and Rwanda and Senegal having the lowest. Therefore, policymakers should focus on improving access to education, especially for women and their partners, and providing exempted services for pregnant women from low-income households. Interventions that target communities with low levels of literacy and media exposure could also be effective in improving the uptake of the services.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景:尽管坚持新的产前保健模式对妊娠结局和孕产妇保健服务的吸收有积极影响,但在资源有限的环境中,妇女对这一建议的依从性很低。以往有关妇女遵守新产前保健建议的研究仅限于个别国家,在撒哈拉以南非洲地区(SSA)尚无相关证据。因此,本研究试图调查撒哈拉以南非洲国家妇女对2016年世卫组织建议的遵守情况,即至少进行八次产前保健接触,并确定其决定因素:研究利用了 16 个 SSA 国家最近的人口与健康调查数据,对 101,983 名在指数妊娠期间接受过产前保健的妇女进行了加权抽样。研究采用多层次混合效应分析法来确定影响产前保健新建议遵从性的因素。使用偏差值和对数似然值对模型进行比较,以 P 值小于 0.05 为统计显著性:结果:撒南非洲妇女对建议的产前保健接触的依从性为 9.9%(95% CI:9.7-10.1%),其中塞拉利昂的依从性最高(26.1%),卢旺达的依从性最低(结论:撒南非洲每十名孕妇中只有一名符合建议的产前保健接触):在撒哈拉以南非洲国家,只有十分之一的孕妇参加了推荐次数的产前接触,其中塞拉利昂的符合率最高,卢旺达和塞内加尔的符合率最低。因此,政策制定者应重点改善教育机会,尤其是妇女及其伴侣的教育机会,并为低收入家庭的孕妇提供豁免服务。针对识字率低和媒体接触少的社区采取干预措施,也能有效提高服务的利用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
期刊最新文献
Employer support for health and social care registered professionals, their patients and service users involved in regulatory fitness to practise regulatory proceedings. Factors influencing the turnover intention for disease control and prevention workers in Northeast China: an empirical analysis based on logistic-ISM model. Qualitative drivers of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics use and resistance in Ethiopia. Supporting young people through the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: a multi-site qualitative longitudinal study. The potential promise and pitfalls of point-of-care viral load monitoring to expedite HIV treatment decision-making in rural Uganda: a qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1